(Label: visualeditor)
|
(Label: visualeditor)
|
||
Regel 6: | Regel 6: | ||
{{Cite|resource=Bestand:Frames pilotbook april 2017.pdf|name=Frames Pilotbook (2017)|dialog=process-file-dialog}} |
{{Cite|resource=Bestand:Frames pilotbook april 2017.pdf|name=Frames Pilotbook (2017)|dialog=process-file-dialog}} |
||
=== Flood risk governance arrangement === |
=== Flood risk governance arrangement === |
||
− | ''Apply flood risk governance arrangements according to the following dimensions:'' |
+ |
===== ''Apply flood risk governance arrangements according to the following dimensions:'' ''<u>Diversification and dominance of strategies.</u> Dominance of some strategies and arrangements in this countrie? What factors explain further diversification of flood risk governance arrangements?'' ''<u>Multi-sector governance.</u> Relates to factors that explain why flood risk governance either has more differentiated structures, such as sector-based water management, or relies on integrated planning – or even integrated risk management – and what are the possible changes therein?'' ''<u>Multi-actor governance.</u> Concerns factors that explain why flood risk governance is a responsibility of the state, the market and/or civil society, their interrelationships, and possible changes therein.'' ''<u>Multi-level governance.</u> Relates to factors that explain why flood risk governance is organised locally, regionally, or nationally, what possible shifts in (de)centralisation we see, and how we can explain them.'' <nowiki>-------------</nowiki> Alblasserwaard Low diversification, defence dominant. Water sector is dominant. De public (state) is dominant. Central en regional level. |
− | ''<u>Diversification and dominance of strategies.</u> Dominance of some strategies and arrangements in this countrie? What factors explain further diversification of flood risk governance arrangements?'' |
+ | {{Cite|resource=Bestand:20180430 Paper Aesop FRAMES.pdf|name=Buijs, J-M. (2018)|dialog=process-file-dialog}} =====
|
− | ''<u>Multi-sector governance.</u> Relates to factors that explain why flood risk governance either has more differentiated structures, such as sector-based water management, or relies on integrated planning – or even integrated risk management – and what are the possible changes therein?'' |
||
− | ''<u>Multi-actor governance.</u> Concerns factors that explain why flood risk governance is a responsibility of the state, the market and/or civil society, their interrelationships, and possible changes therein.'' |
||
− | ''<u>Multi-level governance.</u> Relates to factors that explain why flood risk governance is organised locally, regionally, or nationally, what possible shifts in (de)centralisation we see, and how we can explain them.'' |
||
− | <nowiki>-------------</nowiki> |
||
− | Alblasserwaard |
||
− | Low diversification, defence dominant. Water sector is dominant. De public (state) is dominant. Central en regional level. |
||
− | {{Cite|resource=Bestand:20180430 Paper Aesop FRAMES.pdf|name=Buijs, J-M. (2018)|dialog=process-file-dialog}} |
||
=== Challenges for flood resilience === |
=== Challenges for flood resilience === |
||
=== Current situation === |
=== Current situation === |
Resilience targets: 300.000 inhabitants 2 - 10 communities. Frames Pilotbook (2017)
===== Apply flood risk governance arrangements according to the following dimensions: Diversification and dominance of strategies. Dominance of some strategies and arrangements in this countrie? What factors explain further diversification of flood risk governance arrangements? Multi-sector governance. Relates to factors that explain why flood risk governance either has more differentiated structures, such as sector-based water management, or relies on integrated planning – or even integrated risk management – and what are the possible changes therein? Multi-actor governance. Concerns factors that explain why flood risk governance is a responsibility of the state, the market and/or civil society, their interrelationships, and possible changes therein. Multi-level governance. Relates to factors that explain why flood risk governance is organised locally, regionally, or nationally, what possible shifts in (de)centralisation we see, and how we can explain them. ------------- Alblasserwaard Low diversification, defence dominant. Water sector is dominant. De public (state) is dominant. Central en regional level. Buijs, J-M. (2018) =====