GO-FRESH - Gebruikersbijdragen [nl]

https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Petra GO-FRESH - Gebruikersbijdragen [nl] 2026-06-28T04:28:34Z Gebruikersbijdragen MediaWiki 1.27.7 https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=ZHDSM_The_encounter&diff=50930 ZHDSM The encounter 2018-01-26T07:38:55Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>=== Authors on the encounter ===<br /> * Gill Valentine<br /> ** Living with difference: reflection on geographies of encounter (2008) <br /> ** Biographical narratives of encounter: The significance of mobility and emplacement in shaping attitudes towards difference (2014) <br /> ** Living with difference: proximity and encounter in urban life (2013) <br /> * Ash Amin (2012) <br /> * Gordon W. Allport (1954) The nature of prejudice <br /> * Gibson-Graham (2004) <br /> * Mandy de Wilde (2013) <br /> * Helen F. Wilson - Human Geography department Manchester Uni <br /> ** On geography and encounter: Bodies, borders and difference (2016) <br /> * Nick Schuermans - Department of Geography Vrije universiteit Brussel. Heeft ook papers met Stijn geschreven <br /> Kritisch kijken naar wat geschreven is en hoe wij dat kunnen plaatsen in onze praktijken. <br /> <br /> Wat is the encounter --> Interactie. Effectief kijken naar de interventie + the encounter <br /> <br /> ==== Keywords ====<br /> Geographies of encounter; Geography of encounter; Encounter; Contact hypothesis; <br /> <br /> === Definition & Concepts ===<br /> <br /> ==== The encounter ====<br /> verb (used with object)<br /> # to come upon or meet with, especially unexpectedly <br /> # to meet with or contend against (difficulties, opposition, etc.)<br /> # to meet (a person, military force, etc.) in conflict <br /> verb (used without object) <br /> # to meet, especially unexpectedly or in conflict <br /> noun<br /> # a meeting with a person or thing, especially a casual, unexpected, or brief meeting<br /> # a meeting of persons or groups that are in conflict or opposition: combat: battle <br /> Psychology<br /> # a meeting of two or more people, as the members of an encounter group or a number of married couples (marriage encounter) conducted to promote direct emotional confrontation among the participants, especially as a form of therapy (encounter therapy) <br /> <br /> ==== Equal-Status Contact ====<br /> An '''equal'''-'''status contact''' is a person or group who has a similar background, history, social role, and education. This is a concept of the '''contact''' hypothesis which is a theory regarding how best to improve relations between groups that display hostility towards each other.<br /> <br /> ==== The Contact Hypothesis ====<br /> <br /> === The Encounter ===<br /> * "I begin by critiquing some of the work celebrating urban encounters through using empirical examples of where contact with difference leaves attitudes and values unmoved, and even hardened, before going on to consider debates about '''what kind of encounters produces what might be termed 'meaningful contact''''. By this I mean contact that actually changes values and translates beyond the specifics of the individual moment into a more general positieve respect for - rather than merely tolerance of - others. In doing so, I identify a paradoxical gap that emerges in geographies of encounter between values and practices." (Valentine, 2008, p.325). <br /> Argument for intervening with the encounter, setting up the encounter <br /> * "Holland et al., 2007 found that, although their research sites were frequented by a range of different groups, this did not necessarily mean that there was any contact between the diverse inhabitants. Rather, their observation suggested that while different groups coexisted and even observed each other, none the less there was little actual mixing between different users who self-segregated within particular spaces carving out their own territory....... Likewise, Ash Amin (2002) has observed that city streets are spaces of transit that produce little actual connection or exchange between strangers. '''A process exacerbated by the emergence of a mobile phone culture''', which Deborah Cameron (2000) has observed, '''contributes to incivility in public space as individuals move in and through locations while locked in the private worlds of their conversations with remote others.'''" (Valentine, 2008, p.326). <br /> Due to self-segragation in for example educational arrangements, places of worship, social and cultural networks, many communities operate on the basis of a series of parallel lives. Lives often do not seem to touch at any point, let alone overlap and promote and meaningful interchange (Valentine, 2008, p.326). <br /> <br /> Ash Amin (2002) argues for 'micro-publics of everyday social contact and encounter'. These are events and sites where people from different backgrounds are brought together on purpose. While the encounter often refers to unexpected, none planned, 'meetings' or 'contact', Ash Amin (2002) proposes a planned and organised meeting. <br /> <br /> Sara Ahmed (2000) "...how the stranger is an effect of processes of inclusion and exclusion, or incorporation and expulsion, that constitute the bounderies of bodies and communities (including communities of living and epistemic communities)." "....'''describe such processes as encounters''' in order to show how they are detemined (but not fully detemined)." "...term encounter suggests a meeting, but a meeting which involves surprise and conflict." <br /> <br /> === Types of encounter ===<br /> '''public encounter'''<br /> <br /> Start: Charles Goodsell (The Public Encounter: Where State and Citizen meet, 1981).<br /> <br /> Signaled: the pervasive influence of encounters with public professionals on the daily lives of citizens. <br /> <br /> Traditionally: Max Weber, main point of reference: regulated by formal responsabilities and moral obligations (Weber, 1922). <br /> <br /> Initially: studied as / focus on consequences of bureaucratization (field of organization studies. More recently: digital encounters. Antroplogy and political science: bureaucratization and corruption (Miller eta al., 2001).<br /> <br /> Alternative models: attacking the traditional model of bureaucracy. Not debate on public encounters per se.<br /> <br /> Lipsky (1980) study on street level democracy concrete situations and problems, coping mechanisms, became hallmark of many empirical analyses -> ongoring debate on 'discretion'. First problematic (democratic control). But positive view (creative, deliberative and informed judgement (Wagenaar 2004) -> inspired analyses of the narratives of front line professionals -> public encounters not a mere matter of service delivery but vital element of democratic governance. In this view: public encounters: nurtering personal relationships and constructive communication. Equally empowered.<br /> <br /> No recent study uses the concept of public encounters.<br /> <br /> The understandings of public encounters seems to be locked in individualist ontology in which people are seen as separate beings and ‘public professionals’ and ‘citizens’ form fixed social positions (Stout & Staton, 2011)<br /> <br /> Alternative: relational ontology: people are intrinsically connected in ongoing interactional processes in wchich they constantly and inescapably ‘interweave’ into something different by the very process of meeting (Follet, 1919, 1924).<br /> <br /> This renders it futile to look at an encounter in terms of “I” and “you”; <br /> <br /> it is the “I-Thou” (Buber, 1970), encounter (Anderson et. Al., 2004).<br /> <br /> Relational approach: “what public professionals and citizens are able to do is the product of the quality of the ongoing interactional process through which they encounter each other” (Stout & Staton, 2011)<br /> <br /> Particular qualitative process:”…..with the particular texture of contextual interaction or contact and a kind of mutual learning through activity and interaction that such contact provides…which exists as a relational possiblilty in concrete settings (Campbell Rawlings & Catlaw, 2011, P. 51)<br /> <br /> From: Bartels, K. P. R. (2012). Communicative capacity: How public encounters affect the quality of participatory democracy. Glasgow: University of Glasgow http://theses.gla.ac.uk/3517/1/2012bartelsphd.pdf<br /> <br /> {{Cite|resource=File:Samenvatting_Bartels_Public_Encounter.pdf|name=Abstract|dialog=process-file-dialog}} (public encounter, democracy, participatory democracy, communicative capacity, process) <br /> <br /> === Spaces of encounter ===<br /> {{InfKrt Concept<br /> |Context=ZHDSM context<br /> |prefLabel=The Encounter<br /> |definition=Description of literature on the encounter<br /> |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme<br /> |related=ZHDSM Gill Valentine,<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=ZHDSM_The_encounter&diff=50849 ZHDSM The encounter 2018-01-19T13:56:47Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>=== Authors on the encounter ===<br /> * Gill Valentine<br /> ** Living with difference: reflection on geographies of encounter (2008) <br /> ** Biographical narratives of encounter: The significance of mobility and emplacement in shaping attitudes towards difference (2014) <br /> ** Living with difference: proximity and encounter in urban life (2013) <br /> * Ash Amin (2012) <br /> * Gordon W. Allport (1954) The nature of prejudice <br /> * Gibson-Graham (2004) <br /> * Mandy de Wilde (2013) <br /> * Helen F. Wilson - Human Geography department Manchester Uni <br /> ** On geography and encounter: Bodies, borders and difference (2016) <br /> * Nick Schuermans - Department of Geography Vrije universiteit Brussel. Heeft ook papers met Stijn geschreven <br /> Kritisch kijken naar wat geschreven is en hoe wij dat kunnen plaatsen in onze praktijken. <br /> <br /> Wat is the encounter --> Interactie. Effectief kijken naar de interventie + the encounter <br /> <br /> ==== Keywords ====<br /> Geographies of encounter; Geography of encounter; Encounter; Contact hypothesis; <br /> <br /> === Definition & Concepts ===<br /> <br /> ==== The encounter ====<br /> verb (used with object)<br /> # to come upon or meet with, especially unexpectedly <br /> # to meet with or contend against (difficulties, opposition, etc.)<br /> # to meet (a person, military force, etc.) in conflict <br /> verb (used without object) <br /> # to meet, especially unexpectedly or in conflict <br /> noun<br /> # a meeting with a person or thing, especially a casual, unexpected, or brief meeting<br /> # a meeting of persons or groups that are in conflict or opposition: combat: battle <br /> Psychology<br /> # a meeting of two or more people, as the members of an encounter group or a number of married couples (marriage encounter) conducted to promote direct emotional confrontation among the participants, especially as a form of therapy (encounter therapy) <br /> <br /> ==== Equal-Status Contact ====<br /> An '''equal'''-'''status contact''' is a person or group who has a similar background, history, social role, and education. This is a concept of the '''contact''' hypothesis which is a theory regarding how best to improve relations between groups that display hostility towards each other.<br /> <br /> ==== The Contact Hypothesis ====<br /> <br /> === The Encounter ===<br /> * "I begin by critiquing some of the work celebrating urban encounters through using empirical examples of where contact with difference leaves attitudes and values unmoved, and even hardened, before going on to consider debates about '''what kind of encounters produces what might be termed 'meaningful contact''''. By this I mean contact that actually changes values and translates beyond the specifics of the individual moment into a more general positieve respect for - rather than merely tolerance of - others. In doing so, I identify a paradoxical gap that emerges in geographies of encounter between values and practices." (Valentine, 2008, p.325). <br /> Argument for intervening with the encounter, setting up the encounter <br /> * "Holland et al., 2007 found that, although their research sites were frequented by a range of different groups, this did not necessarily mean that there was any contact between the diverse inhabitants. Rather, their observation suggested that while different groups coexisted and even observed each other, none the less there was little actual mixing between different users who self-segregated within particular spaces carving out their own territory....... Likewise, Ash Amin (2002) has observed that city streets are spaces of transit that produce little actual connection or exchange between strangers. '''A process exacerbated by the emergence of a mobile phone culture''', which Deborah Cameron (2000) has observed, '''contributes to incivility in public space as individuals move in and through locations while locked in the private worlds of their conversations with remote others.'''" (Valentine, 2008, p.326). <br /> Due to self-segragation in for example educational arrangements, places of worship, social and cultural networks, many communities operate on the basis of a series of parallel lives. Lives often do not seem to touch at any point, let alone overlap and promote and meaningful interchange (Valentine, 2008, p.326). <br /> <br /> Ash Amin (2002) argues for 'micro-publics of everyday social contact and encounter'. These are events and sites where people from different backgrounds are brought together on purpose. While the encounter often refers to unexpected, none planned, 'meetings' or 'contact', Ash Amin (2002) proposes a planned and organised meeting. <br /> <br /> === Types of encounter ===<br /> '''public encounter'''<br /> <br /> Start: Charles Goodsell (The Public Encounter: Where State and Citizen meet, 1981).<br /> <br /> Signaled: the pervasive influence of encounters with public professionals on the daily lives of citizens. <br /> <br /> Traditionally: Max Weber, main point of reference: regulated by formal responsabilities and moral obligations (Weber, 1922). <br /> <br /> Initially: studied as / focus on consequences of bureaucratization (field of organization studies. More recently: digital encounters. Antroplogy and political science: bureaucratization and corruption (Miller eta al., 2001).<br /> <br /> Alternative models: attacking the traditional model of bureaucracy. Not debate on public encounters per se.<br /> <br /> Lipsky (1980) study on street level democracy concrete situations and problems, coping mechanisms, became hallmark of many empirical analyses -> ongoring debate on 'discretion'. First problematic (democratic control). But positive view (creative, deliberative and informed judgement (Wagenaar 2004) -> inspired analyses of the narratives of front line professionals -> public encounters not a mere matter of service delivery but vital element of democratic governance. In this view: public encounters: nurtering personal relationships and constructive communication. Equally empowered.<br /> <br /> No recent study uses the concept of public encounters.<br /> <br /> The understandigns of public encounters seems to be locked in individualist ontology in which people are seen as separate beings and ‘public professionals’ and ‘citizens’ form fixed social positions (Stout & Staton, 2011)<br /> <br /> Alternative: relational ontology: people are intrinsically connected in ongoing interactional processes in wchich they constantly and inescapably ‘interweave’ into something different by the very process of meeting (Follet, 1919, 1924).<br /> <br /> This renders it futile to look at an encounter in terms of “I” and “you”; <br /> <br /> it is the “I-Thou” (Buber, 1970), encounter (Anderson et. Al., 2004).<br /> <br /> Relational approach: “what public professionals and citizens are able to do is the product of the quality of the ongoing interactional process through which they encounter each other” (Stout & Staton, 2011)<br /> <br /> Particular qualitative process:”…..with the particular texture of contextual interaction or contact and a kind of mutual learning through activity and interaction that such contact provides…which exists as a relational possiblilty in concrete settings (Campbell Rawlings & Catlaw, 2011, P. 51)<br /> <br /> From: Bartels, K. P. R. (2012). Communicative capacity: How public encounters affect the quality of participatory democracy. Glasgow: University of Glasgow http://theses.gla.ac.uk/3517/1/2012bartelsphd.pdf<br /> <br /> Abstract (public encounter, democracy, participatory democracy, communicative capacity, process) <br /> <br /> === Spaces of encounter ===<br /> {{InfKrt Concept<br /> |Context=ZHDSM context<br /> |prefLabel=The Encounter<br /> |definition=Description of literature on the encounter<br /> |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme<br /> |related=ZHDSM Gill Valentine,<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=LC_00758&diff=50552 LC 00758 2018-01-04T15:02:16Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>'''Titles of our research (August 2017)''' <br /> <br /> '''Petra de Braal -''' <br /> <br /> '''Kim Boes -''' <br /> <br /> == Projectlogboek ==<br /> Hierin houden wij aantekeningen van besprekingen bij, de dingen die we al hebben geschreven en ook de monitoring en evaluatie van ons project. <br /> <br /> === Aantekeningen besprekingen ===<br /> <br /> ==== '''14.06.2017 - Antwerpen - Stijn, Kim, Petra''' ====<br /> * In ons eerste geschreven stuk praten we niet over de plaats/plek van de projecten. Deze zijn natuurlijk van belang en mogen daarom zeker niet vergeten worden. <br /> * Er worden een heleboel verschillende richtingen genoemd met bijpassende auteurs<br /> ** Het kleine verzet - Tine Hens. Collum in MoMagazine - 5 artikelen over project Stijn<br /> ** Geografie --> Care --> Doreen Massey <br /> ** Frans Thisse (sociale geografie) <br /> ** Feminisme --> Solidariteit --> Geography of effects <br /> ** The end of capitalism as we knew it - Graham and Gibson <br /> *** Ethics of the local <br /> *** Are we thinking Marxism <br /> * We moeten ook de andere kant van het verhaal beschrijven, de kant waar we meer kritisch naar kijken<br /> ** Mandy de Wilde - Als meedoen pijn doet <br /> ** Evelien Tonkens en Jan Willem Duyvendak in discussie met Jan Rotmans <br /> * Wij pikten "Imagined community" uit Ash Amin --> waar komt dit vandaan. Verbeelding en sense of place <br /> * Gill Valentine --> Geography of encounter - Contact hypothese <br /> * George Simmel - The Stranger<br /> * Kijk ook naar Cohesie en Segregatie <br /> <br /> ==== '''02.10.2017 - Antwerpen - Stijn, Kim, Petra''' ====<br /> Outline wordt als eerste besproken <br /> * Onvoldoende argumentatie in de outline, deze verder uitbreiden <br /> ** Alleen concepten is niet genoeg om het te argumenteren <br /> ** Geef meer en duidelijkere informatie rondom de keuze voor sociale innovatie, waar is de GAP<br /> ** huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistisch / minimalistisch en transformatief / ....opzoeken).<br /> ** GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> ** Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken. <br /> * Proces is te weinig uitgelegd. Gaat te snel over en heeft meer info en uitleg nodig. <br /> ** Denk aan verschillende processen die er zijn <br /> ** Denk ook aan je positionering. Voor wie schrijven we de teksten <br /> * Als tip kunnen we gaan kijken naar de micro verbanden tussen mensen. Dit is tot nu toe weinig gedaan in de literatuur rondom sociale innovatie en zou dus een innovatieve invalshoek kunnen zijn voor ons onderzoek.<br /> <br /> '''Paper 1''' <br /> <br /> Dit mag een theoretisch paper zijn. Gericht naar en geplaatst in de algemene sociale innovatie literatuur. Zonder data (met case in het achterhoofd). <br /> * We gaan al in de richting van place and community in onze argumentatie. <br /> ** Amin en Massey zijn tot nu toe auteurs en richtingen die niet gelinkt zijn met sociale innovatie. Dit zou een nieuwe invalshoek kunnen zijn. <br /> ** publiek: andere SI onderzoekers <br /> '''Paper 2''' <br /> * Wie is het publiek van dit paper? Waar willen wij iets bereiken met de kennis die we hier hebben? Hier kijken naar andere actoren in het debat. <br /> ** Bestuurswetenschappen zou een richting kunnen zijn waar er verder nog niet veel naar het proces wordt gekeken. <br /> ** lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen? <br /> ** relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn? <br /> ** inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur! <br /> ** etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen. Etnografie en innovatie. <br /> ** Nadeel van die discipline: generieke modellen. <br /> ** Genoemd: intentional neighbouring. Christelijk / bewuste werkwijze/ vanuit overtuiging / werkt dat? <br /> ** concepten: proces: specifieke plaats / hoe kan dat ontmoeten er uit zien / nabijheid <br /> ** proces: individu al noemen / hoe vindt die ontmoeting plaats in specifieke ruimte en komt daar collaboration uit? Hoe? <br /> * NOTE: The Encounter wordt in de sociale wetenschappen theorie altijd gezien als een '''''ontmoeting tussen vreemden.''''' <br /> * Heeft een zwaardere lading; gaat over een specifiek type ontmoeting <br /> * Niet meer dan twee concepten per paper bespreken anders wordt het teveel. Traffic: 1 argument per paper / 2 concepten. Volgend paper: nuance aanbrengen (externe factor). <br /> '''Paper 3'''<br /> <br /> Hier willen we verder inzoomen op de individu. <br /> * Zouden verder in kunnen gaan op de ethiek; Ethics of care (Amin)<br /> ** Wat betekend het "zorgen voor elkaar". De typische rol van de man en de vrouw maar ook geloofsovertuiging; e.g. intentional neighbouring (christelijke mensen die in een achterstandsbuurt gaan wonen en effectief werken aan het opnieuw verbindingen maken tussen mensen om de kwaliteit van leven er weer te verhogen) <br /> ** Kijkt eigenlijk naar het klein individuele proces / ethics in microproces. <br /> ** specifiek: zorgdragen voor elkaar. <br /> ** In literatuur ethics soms gebruikt als alternatief voor solidariteit (feministische literatuur) <br /> ** specifiek kijken naar individuele ervaringen (techniek). <br /> ** link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat: <br /> ** zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie? <br /> * De vraag is dan: '''Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself?''' <br /> * welke concepten hier gebruiken? <br /> '''Paper 4'''<br /> <br /> Zouden willen kijken naar de houding van de politici zelf. Welke relatie moet je aangaan? <br /> * Kunnen eventueel kunnen kijken naar de affiniteit, het gevoel van mensen die in het bestuur zitten. <br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon. <br /> * Kan geplaatst worden in de bestuurswetenschappen en/of beleidswetenschappen. <br /> * Op de lange termijn: luisteren <br /> * Hier vanuit antropologisch perspectief naar kijken / affectief <br /> * keuze: affectieve dimensie (hoe positioneert iemand zich en het project/ welke uitleg wordt gegeven / is iemand authentiek of wil hij mensen voor zijn/haar karretje spannen OF kijken naar waarden en normen. <br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers. Kijkt men daar al naar in de bestuurswetenschappen of de beleidswetenschappen? <br /> '''Paper 5'''<br /> * Als je best practice wordt, wat doet dat dan met je? Wat gebeurd er met je? <br /> * Wat doet het als je wordt uitgekozen, busladingen geïnteresseerden langskomen, je een voorbeeld / succesvol wordt? <br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd <br /> * de rol van plaats <br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie <br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep <br /> * techniek: auto-etnografie <br /> * dilemma's: affectief / interne verhoudingen / exposure <br /> '''Paper 6'''<br /> * Verbinden aan paper 5. <br /> * Auto-etnografie van Petra om te kijken wat het doet met de persoon die dit proces inzet.<br /> ** Ben je een professional of ben je een bewoner?<br /> ** Kan je als professional je afsluiten voor wat er op de plek gebeurd? Stijn denkt dat dit wel kan. Stijn denkt: de professional gaat weg en kent deze reactie niet.<br /> ** Mensen vinden het lastig om verbindingen te blijven leggen met elkaar wanneer de professional weg is: Dit is risicovol, de Encounter is risicovol - Exposure. Professional als object van solidariteit. <br /> ** buffer zijn / risico absorberen <br /> ** pedagogie als discipline? <br /> <br /> Bespreking van de argumentatie die we hadden meegestuurd. <br /> * Alle definities van sociale innovatie bespreken. Beginnen met die van the Young Foundation <br /> * In hoofdstuk 4 maken we een te grote sprong tussen collaboration en social capital. Deze twee zijn nog ver van elkaar verwijderd. Overbruggend social capital zit daar nog wel tussen<br /> ** Als mensen anders zijn is collaboration veel moeilijker, hier is veel meer voor nodig dan wanneer mensen hetzelfde zijn. <br /> ** Putnam - Bowling alone: hoe werkt collaboratie. Decline social capital. Social capital is macro analyse. Wederzijds vertrouwen. collaboratie is samenwerken. <br /> ** Putnam: geen gebrek aan sociaal kapitaal maar: gebrek aan overbruggend sociaal kapitaal. Bij 'de vreemde' is dat veel moeilijker (proffesionals / organisatie / overheid) <br /> * Kijken naar literatuur rondom Ethnographie of innovation & Antropology of innovation <br /> <br /> ==== '''03-01-2018 - Antwerpen - Stijn, Kim, Petra''' ====<br /> Empirisch materiaal doorgenomen.<br /> <br /> Encounter:<br /> <br /> Wat is een encounter? De aard van de interactie die we organiseren?<br /> <br /> Breskens: overheid en coporatie hebben verantwoordelijkheid (vastgesteld / missie) Hoe sluit die aan op de bestaande zorgethiek (van mensen zelf / uit de interviews naar boven komt)? En hoe kunnen de overheid en maatschappelijke organisaties daarop aansluiten?<br /> * paper 1. The Encounter. G.W. Allport The Nature of Prejudice: contacthypothese. Heel bekend en veel literatuur over. Equal status contact. Stijn: Gaat over iets anders dan waar wij naar kijken. Gaat over: eaqual status contact. Daar zijn geen professionals bij betrokken. Betreft contacten buiten interventie perspectief. Maar: wij kunnen het concept losmaken en een nieuwe invulling geven. Wat zjjn de mogelijheden om meer als gelijken samen te komen. Juist wel vanuit een interventie perspectief! Onderzoeken: niet ingaan op vooroordelen (= Allport) maar juist kijken hoe je dit kunt organiseren en de effecten. Heeft ook link met 'affectief burgerschap' van bijvoorbeeld Mandy de Wilde. Die insteek kiezen we niet. Stap 1: literatuur over the encounter erbij zoeken.<br /> * paper 2. The role of Place. Aantonen HOE plaats een rol kan spelen (i.p.v. dat plaats belangrijk is). Voorbeeld besproken dat gemeente denkt dat wijkgebouw de oplossing is in Breskens / de voorzieningen in Veere). Door zelf betekenis te geven. Placemaking. Er is literatuur over 'aging and place'. Discussie: moeten we voorzieningen verplaatsen of daar laten. Veel beleid door bepaald. Maar: is een dure optie. Niet meegaan in de discussie over die twee opties maar: binnen de optie wel daar laten: hoe doe je dat / hoe kun je dat vormgeven? Je kiest die strategie en hoe kun je dat dan doen? Interventie in dit debat! Combinatie maken van 'aging and place' en 'placemaking'.<br /> * paper 5. Best Peactice. Er is veel literatuur over hoe best practices mobiel worden. Rol stigmatisering. Controle over beeldvorming.<br /> * paper 6. Auto-ethnografie. Wat is het effect van....Vanuit actie-perspectief kijken. <br /> <br /> === Geschreven teksten ===<br /> 02.05.2017 Petra de Braal - {{Cite|resource=File:Research_Introduction_-_Petra_de_Braal_Mei_2017.pdf|name=Research Introduction|dialog=process-file-dialog}} <br /> <br /> 14.06.2017 Petra de Braal en Kim Boes - {{Cite|resource=File:Social_innovation_–_Content_and_Process.pdf|name=Social innovation – Content and Process|dialog=process-file-dialog}}''': ''A discussion between Amin and the practical experiences we gained from our projects'''''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Monitoring, toetsing en evalueren ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> == Onderzoekslogboek ==<br /> <br /> Hierin houden wij het proces bij van de verschillende delen van ons onderzoek. <br /> === Aanpak van het verkrijgen van de onderzoeksvragen ===<br /> '''17.04.2017 Eerste onderzoeksvragen/thema's'''<br /> * Social Innovation<br /> ** Social Innovation Process<br /> *** The individual in the process<br /> **** How do they give meaning to their actions?<br /> **** How does this affect the co-production of self?<br /> <br /> '''02.05.2017 Onderzoeksvragen opgesteld in eerste stuk geschreven door Petra''' <br /> * How does reflexivity mediate the agency-structure dynamics in social innovation processes? <br /> * What is the role of narratives in the social innovation process? <br /> * What is the role of identity dynamics in the social innovation process? <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het opstellen van het onderzoeksplan ===<br /> <br /> ==== Eerste versie onderzoeksplan ====<br /> '''Email Stijn 28.08.2017''' <br /> <br /> ''"Bereiden jullie een document met een tijdsplanning voor jullie doctoraat voor?'' <br /> <br /> ''Kunnen jullie ook al een en ander op papier zetten over de structuur van jullie doctoraat? Mijn voorstel zou zijn dat jullie op artikels doctoreren (omvat een inleidend hoofdstuk die doctoraat kadert en positioneert in wetenschappelijk debat, minimaal vier papers met telkens een argument dat op basis van empirische gegevens wordt onderbouwd en een conclusie). De werkzaamheden kunnen zo in kleinere pakketjes opgedeeld kunnen worden, wat me in jullie geval meer hanteerbaar lijkt. Het zou goed zijn mochten jullie al eens nadenken wat jullie in elk van die hoofdstukken zouden kwijt willen (argument, dimensie van de algemene problematiek, welke case). Dit mag tentatief zijn, maar het zal een eerste idee geven van wat nodig is voor het doctoraat."''<br /> <br /> '''Reactie 02.10.2017'''<br /> <br /> ===== '''Paper 1''': Setting the scene for social innovation =====<br /> <u>Aim: Critical discussion between the current literature and our secondary data</u><br /> * Argumentation:<br /> ** Social innovation is under represented as a practise in the innovation research literature (Cajaiba-Santana 2014). However, increasingly the focus shifts also into the direction of social innovation centralised around tackling issues affecting society at large (Phillips et al. 2015). While it is recognised social innovation is a vital practise in todays society (Grimm et al. 2013), scholars ask for more research in this field (Mulgan 2006; Cajaiba-Santana 2014; Phillips et al. 2015). <br /> * Method - Secondary data<br /> ** Case: Ulrum & dZH <br /> <br /> ===== '''Paper 2''': The process of social innovation =====<br /> <u>Aim:</u> <br /> * Argumentation:<br /> ** While the literature on the business innovation process has been explored in-depth over the last decades, research focussing on the social innovation process is to date limited (Lettice and Parekh 2010; Phillips et al. 2015). <br /> * Concepts discussed:<br /> ** The encounter<br /> * Method - Case study method. Combination of secondary data (official documents, published articles, blog, etc.), interviews, and focus group<br /> ** Case: Combination of the data sets Ulrum & dZH <br /> <br /> ===== '''Paper 3''': Practises of care =====<br /> <u>Aim:</u><br /> * Argumentation:<br /> * Concepts discussed:<br /> ** <br /> * Method - Case study method. Combination of secondary data (official documents, published articles, blog, etc.), interviews, and focus group<br /> ** Case: Combination of the data sets Ulrum & dZH <br /> <br /> ===== '''Paper 4''': Politics of care - Governance =====<br /> <u>Aim:</u><br /> * Argumentation:<br /> * Concepts discussed:<br /> ** Agency<br /> ** Policy making<br /> * Method - Case study method. Combination of secondary data (official documents, published articles, blog, etc.), interviews, and focus group<br /> ** Case: Combination of the data sets Ulrum & dZH <br /> <br /> ===== '''Timeframe (version september 2017)''' =====<br /> '''Year 1 --> October 2018'''<br /> * Write theoretical paper with a critical discussion between current literature and secondary data <br /> * Collect data <br /> ** Conduct interviews<br /> ** Transcribe interviews <br /> ** Part analyses <br /> '''Year 2+3 = 27 months''' <br /> * Publish three empirical papers <br /> * Extra months could be included taken from the fourth year <br /> '''Year 4 --> 6 - 9 months''' <br /> * Write introduction and conclusion<br /> * Finishing touch <br /> '''Finish by December 2021'''<br /> <br /> {{Light Context<br /> |Supercontext=PR 00139<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Toppage=Process<br /> |Sequence number=1<br /> |Context type=Situation<br /> |Heading=Process<br /> |Show referred by=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=LC_00758&diff=50535 LC 00758 2018-01-04T09:55:41Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>'''Titles of our research (August 2017)''' <br /> <br /> '''Petra de Braal -''' <br /> <br /> '''Kim Boes -''' <br /> <br /> == Projectlogboek ==<br /> Hierin houden wij aantekeningen van besprekingen bij, de dingen die we al hebben geschreven en ook de monitoring en evaluatie van ons project. <br /> <br /> === Aantekeningen besprekingen ===<br /> <br /> ==== '''14.06.2017 - Antwerpen - Stijn, Kim, Petra''' ====<br /> * In ons eerste geschreven stuk praten we niet over de plaats/plek van de projecten. Deze zijn natuurlijk van belang en mogen daarom zeker niet vergeten worden. <br /> * Er worden een heleboel verschillende richtingen genoemd met bijpassende auteurs<br /> ** Het kleine verzet - Tine Hens. Collum in MoMagazine - 5 artikelen over project Stijn<br /> ** Geografie --> Care --> Doreen Massey <br /> ** Frans Thisse (sociale geografie) <br /> ** Feminisme --> Solidariteit --> Geography of effects <br /> ** The end of capitalism as we knew it - Graham and Gibson <br /> *** Ethics of the local <br /> *** Are we thinking Marxism <br /> * We moeten ook de andere kant van het verhaal beschrijven, de kant waar we meer kritisch naar kijken<br /> ** Mandy de Wilde - Als meedoen pijn doet <br /> ** Evelien Tonkens en Jan Willem Duyvendak in discussie met Jan Rotmans <br /> * Wij pikten "Imagined community" uit Ash Amin --> waar komt dit vandaan. Verbeelding en sense of place <br /> * Gill Valentine --> Geography of encounter - Contact hypothese <br /> * George Simmel - The Stranger<br /> * Kijk ook naar Cohesie en Segregatie <br /> <br /> ==== '''02.10.2017 - Antwerpen - Stijn, Kim, Petra''' ====<br /> Outline wordt als eerste besproken <br /> * Onvoldoende argumentatie in de outline, deze verder uitbreiden <br /> ** Alleen concepten is niet genoeg om het te argumenteren <br /> ** Geef meer en duidelijkere informatie rondom de keuze voor sociale innovatie, waar is de GAP<br /> ** huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistisch / minimalistisch en transformatief / ....opzoeken).<br /> ** GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> ** Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken. <br /> * Proces is te weinig uitgelegd. Gaat te snel over en heeft meer info en uitleg nodig. <br /> ** Denk aan verschillende processen die er zijn <br /> ** Denk ook aan je positionering. Voor wie schrijven we de teksten <br /> * Als tip kunnen we gaan kijken naar de micro verbanden tussen mensen. Dit is tot nu toe weinig gedaan in de literatuur rondom sociale innovatie en zou dus een innovatieve invalshoek kunnen zijn voor ons onderzoek.<br /> <br /> '''Paper 1''' <br /> <br /> Dit mag een theoretisch paper zijn. Gericht naar en geplaatst in de algemene sociale innovatie literatuur. Zonder data (met case in het achterhoofd). <br /> * We gaan al in de richting van place and community in onze argumentatie. <br /> ** Amin en Massey zijn tot nu toe auteurs en richtingen die niet gelinkt zijn met sociale innovatie. Dit zou een nieuwe invalshoek kunnen zijn. <br /> ** publiek: andere SI onderzoekers <br /> '''Paper 2''' <br /> * Wie is het publiek van dit paper? Waar willen wij iets bereiken met de kennis die we hier hebben? Hier kijken naar andere actoren in het debat. <br /> ** Bestuurswetenschappen zou een richting kunnen zijn waar er verder nog niet veel naar het proces wordt gekeken. <br /> ** lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen? <br /> ** relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn? <br /> ** inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur! <br /> ** etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen. Etnografie en innovatie. <br /> ** Nadeel van die discipline: generieke modellen. <br /> ** Genoemd: intentional neighbouring. Christelijk / bewuste werkwijze/ vanuit overtuiging / werkt dat? <br /> ** concepten: proces: specifieke plaats / hoe kan dat ontmoeten er uit zien / nabijheid <br /> ** proces: individu al noemen / hoe vindt die ontmoeting plaats in specifieke ruimte en komt daar collaboration uit? Hoe? <br /> * NOTE: The Encounter wordt in de sociale wetenschappen theorie altijd gezien als een '''''ontmoeting tussen vreemden.''''' <br /> * Heeft een zwaardere lading; gaat over een specifiek type ontmoeting <br /> * Niet meer dan twee concepten per paper bespreken anders wordt het teveel. Traffic: 1 argument per paper / 2 concepten. Volgend paper: nuance aanbrengen (externe factor). <br /> '''Paper 3'''<br /> <br /> Hier willen we verder inzoomen op de individu. <br /> * Zouden verder in kunnen gaan op de ethiek; Ethics of care (Amin)<br /> ** Wat betekend het "zorgen voor elkaar". De typische rol van de man en de vrouw maar ook geloofsovertuiging; e.g. intentional neighbouring (christelijke mensen die in een achterstandsbuurt gaan wonen en effectief werken aan het opnieuw verbindingen maken tussen mensen om de kwaliteit van leven er weer te verhogen) <br /> ** Kijkt eigenlijk naar het klein individuele proces / ethics in microproces. <br /> ** specifiek: zorgdragen voor elkaar. <br /> ** In literatuur ethics soms gebruikt als alternatief voor solidariteit (feministische literatuur) <br /> ** specifiek kijken naar individuele ervaringen (techniek). <br /> ** link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat: <br /> ** zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie? <br /> * De vraag is dan: '''Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself?''' <br /> * welke concepten hier gebruiken? <br /> '''Paper 4'''<br /> <br /> Zouden willen kijken naar de houding van de politici zelf. Welke relatie moet je aangaan? <br /> * Kunnen eventueel kunnen kijken naar de affiniteit, het gevoel van mensen die in het bestuur zitten. <br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon. <br /> * Kan geplaatst worden in de bestuurswetenschappen en/of beleidswetenschappen. <br /> * Op de lange termijn: luisteren <br /> * Hier vanuit antropologisch perspectief naar kijken / affectief <br /> * keuze: affectieve dimensie (hoe positioneert iemand zich en het project/ welke uitleg wordt gegeven / is iemand authentiek of wil hij mensen voor zijn/haar karretje spannen OF kijken naar waarden en normen. <br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers. Kijkt men daar al naar in de bestuurswetenschappen of de beleidswetenschappen? <br /> '''Paper 5'''<br /> * Als je best practice wordt, wat doet dat dan met je? Wat gebeurd er met je? <br /> * Wat doet het als je wordt uitgekozen, busladingen geïnteresseerden langskomen, je een voorbeeld / succesvol wordt? <br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd <br /> * de rol van plaats <br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie <br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep <br /> * techniek: auto-etnografie <br /> * dilemma's: affectief / interne verhoudingen / exposure <br /> '''Paper 6'''<br /> * Verbinden aan paper 5. <br /> * Auto-etnografie van Petra om te kijken wat het doet met de persoon die dit proces inzet.<br /> ** Ben je een professional of ben je een bewoner?<br /> ** Kan je als professional je afsluiten voor wat er op de plek gebeurd? Stijn denkt dat dit wel kan. Stijn denkt: de professional gaat weg en kent deze reactie niet.<br /> ** Mensen vinden het lastig om verbindingen te blijven leggen met elkaar wanneer de professional weg is: Dit is risicovol, de Encounter is risicovol - Exposure. Professional als object van solidariteit. <br /> ** buffer zijn / risico absorberen <br /> ** pedagogie als discipline? <br /> <br /> Bespreking van de argumentatie die we hadden meegestuurd. <br /> * Alle definities van sociale innovatie bespreken. Beginnen met die van the Young Foundation <br /> * In hoofdstuk 4 maken we een te grote sprong tussen collaboration en social capital. Deze twee zijn nog ver van elkaar verwijderd. Overbruggend social capital zit daar nog wel tussen<br /> ** Als mensen anders zijn is collaboration veel moeilijker, hier is veel meer voor nodig dan wanneer mensen hetzelfde zijn. <br /> ** Putnam - Bowling alone: hoe werkt collaboratie. Decline social capital. Social capital is macro analyse. Wederzijds vertrouwen. collaboratie is samenwerken. <br /> ** Putnam: geen gebrek aan sociaal kapitaal maar: gebrek aan overbruggend sociaal kapitaal. Bij 'de vreemde' is dat veel moeilijker (proffesionals / organisatie / overheid) <br /> * Kijken naar literatuur rondom Ethnographie of innovation & Antropology of innovation <br /> <br /> ==== '''03-01-2018 - Antwerpen - Stijn, Kim, Petra''' ====<br /> Empirisch materiaal doorgenomen.<br /> <br /> Encounter:<br /> <br /> Wat is een encounter? De aard van de interactie die we organiseren?<br /> <br /> Breskens: overheid en coporatie hebben verantwoordelijkheid (vastgesteld / missie) Hoe sluit die aan op de bestaande zorgethiek (van mensen zelf / uit de interviews naar boven komt)? En hoe kunnen de overheid en maatschappelijke organisaties daarop aansluiten?<br /> * paper 1. The Encounter. G.W. Allport The Natur of Prejudice: contacthypothese. Heel bekend en veel literatuur over. Equal status contact. Stijn: Gaat over iets anders dan waar wij naar kijken. Gaat over: eaqual status contact. Daar zijn geen professionals bij betrokken. Betreft contacten buiten interventie perspectief. Maar: wij kunnen het concept losmaken en een nieuwe invulling geven. Wat zjjn de mogelijheden om meer als gelijken samen te komen. Juist wel vanuit een interventie perspectief! Onderzoeken: niet ingaan op vooroordelen (= Allport) maar juist kijken hoe je dit kunt organiseren en de effecten. Heeft ook link met 'affectief burgerschap' van bijvoorbeeld Mandy de Wilde. Die insteek kiezen we niet. Stap 1: literatuur over the encounter erbij zoeken.<br /> * paper 2. The role of Place. Aantonen HOE plaats een rol kan spelen (i.p.v. dat plaats belangrijk is). Voorbeeld besproken dat gemeente denkt dat wijkgebouw de oplossing is in Breskens / de voorzieningen in Veere). Door zelf betekenis te geven. Placemaking. Er is literatuur over 'aging and place'. Discussie: moeten we voorzieningen verplaatsen of daar laten. Veel beleid door bepaald. Maar: is een dure optie. Niet meegaan in de discussie over die twee opties maar: binnen de optie wel daar laten: hoe doe je dat / hoe kun je dat vormgeven? Je kiest die strategie en hoe kun je dat dan doen? Interventie in dit debat! Combinatie maken van 'aging and place' en 'placemaking'.<br /> * paper 5. Best Peactice. Er is veel literatuur over hoe best practices mobiel worden. Rol stigmatisering. Controle over beeldvorming.<br /> * paper 6. Auto-ethnografie. Wat is het effect van....Vanuit actie-perspectief kijken. <br /> <br /> === Geschreven teksten ===<br /> 02.05.2017 Petra de Braal - {{Cite|resource=File:Research_Introduction_-_Petra_de_Braal_Mei_2017.pdf|name=Research Introduction|dialog=process-file-dialog}} <br /> <br /> 14.06.2017 Petra de Braal en Kim Boes - {{Cite|resource=File:Social_innovation_–_Content_and_Process.pdf|name=Social innovation – Content and Process|dialog=process-file-dialog}}''': ''A discussion between Amin and the practical experiences we gained from our projects'''''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Monitoring, toetsing en evalueren ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> == Onderzoekslogboek ==<br /> <br /> Hierin houden wij het proces bij van de verschillende delen van ons onderzoek. <br /> === Aanpak van het verkrijgen van de onderzoeksvragen ===<br /> '''17.04.2017 Eerste onderzoeksvragen/thema's'''<br /> * Social Innovation<br /> ** Social Innovation Process<br /> *** The individual in the process<br /> **** How do they give meaning to their actions?<br /> **** How does this affect the co-production of self?<br /> <br /> '''02.05.2017 Onderzoeksvragen opgesteld in eerste stuk geschreven door Petra''' <br /> * How does reflexivity mediate the agency-structure dynamics in social innovation processes? <br /> * What is the role of narratives in the social innovation process? <br /> * What is the role of identity dynamics in the social innovation process? <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het opstellen van het onderzoeksplan ===<br /> <br /> ==== Eerste versie onderzoeksplan ====<br /> '''Email Stijn 28.08.2017''' <br /> <br /> ''"Bereiden jullie een document met een tijdsplanning voor jullie doctoraat voor?'' <br /> <br /> ''Kunnen jullie ook al een en ander op papier zetten over de structuur van jullie doctoraat? Mijn voorstel zou zijn dat jullie op artikels doctoreren (omvat een inleidend hoofdstuk die doctoraat kadert en positioneert in wetenschappelijk debat, minimaal vier papers met telkens een argument dat op basis van empirische gegevens wordt onderbouwd en een conclusie). De werkzaamheden kunnen zo in kleinere pakketjes opgedeeld kunnen worden, wat me in jullie geval meer hanteerbaar lijkt. Het zou goed zijn mochten jullie al eens nadenken wat jullie in elk van die hoofdstukken zouden kwijt willen (argument, dimensie van de algemene problematiek, welke case). Dit mag tentatief zijn, maar het zal een eerste idee geven van wat nodig is voor het doctoraat."''<br /> <br /> '''Reactie 02.10.2017'''<br /> <br /> ===== '''Paper 1''': Setting the scene for social innovation =====<br /> <u>Aim: Critical discussion between the current literature and our secondary data</u><br /> * Argumentation:<br /> ** Social innovation is under represented as a practise in the innovation research literature (Cajaiba-Santana 2014). However, increasingly the focus shifts also into the direction of social innovation centralised around tackling issues affecting society at large (Phillips et al. 2015). While it is recognised social innovation is a vital practise in todays society (Grimm et al. 2013), scholars ask for more research in this field (Mulgan 2006; Cajaiba-Santana 2014; Phillips et al. 2015). <br /> * Method - Secondary data<br /> ** Case: Ulrum & dZH <br /> <br /> ===== '''Paper 2''': The process of social innovation =====<br /> <u>Aim:</u> <br /> * Argumentation:<br /> ** While the literature on the business innovation process has been explored in-depth over the last decades, research focussing on the social innovation process is to date limited (Lettice and Parekh 2010; Phillips et al. 2015). <br /> * Concepts discussed:<br /> ** The encounter<br /> * Method - Case study method. Combination of secondary data (official documents, published articles, blog, etc.), interviews, and focus group<br /> ** Case: Combination of the data sets Ulrum & dZH <br /> <br /> ===== '''Paper 3''': Practises of care =====<br /> <u>Aim:</u><br /> * Argumentation:<br /> * Concepts discussed:<br /> ** <br /> * Method - Case study method. Combination of secondary data (official documents, published articles, blog, etc.), interviews, and focus group<br /> ** Case: Combination of the data sets Ulrum & dZH <br /> <br /> ===== '''Paper 4''': Politics of care - Governance =====<br /> <u>Aim:</u><br /> * Argumentation:<br /> * Concepts discussed:<br /> ** Agency<br /> ** Policy making<br /> * Method - Case study method. Combination of secondary data (official documents, published articles, blog, etc.), interviews, and focus group<br /> ** Case: Combination of the data sets Ulrum & dZH <br /> <br /> ===== '''Timeframe (version september 2017)''' =====<br /> '''Year 1 --> October 2018'''<br /> * Write theoretical paper with a critical discussion between current literature and secondary data <br /> * Collect data <br /> ** Conduct interviews<br /> ** Transcribe interviews <br /> ** Part analyses <br /> '''Year 2+3 = 27 months''' <br /> * Publish three empirical papers <br /> * Extra months could be included taken from the fourth year <br /> '''Year 4 --> 6 - 9 months''' <br /> * Write introduction and conclusion<br /> * Finishing touch <br /> '''Finish by December 2021'''<br /> <br /> {{Light Context<br /> |Supercontext=PR 00139<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Toppage=Process<br /> |Sequence number=1<br /> |Context type=Situation<br /> |Heading=Process<br /> |Show referred by=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=LC_00758&diff=50534 LC 00758 2018-01-04T09:54:36Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>'''Titles of our research (August 2017)''' <br /> <br /> '''Petra de Braal -''' <br /> <br /> '''Kim Boes -''' <br /> <br /> == Projectlogboek ==<br /> Hierin houden wij aantekeningen van besprekingen bij, de dingen die we al hebben geschreven en ook de monitoring en evaluatie van ons project. <br /> <br /> === Aantekeningen besprekingen ===<br /> <br /> ==== '''14.06.2017 - Antwerpen - Stijn, Kim, Petra''' ====<br /> * In ons eerste geschreven stuk praten we niet over de plaats/plek van de projecten. Deze zijn natuurlijk van belang en mogen daarom zeker niet vergeten worden. <br /> * Er worden een heleboel verschillende richtingen genoemd met bijpassende auteurs<br /> ** Het kleine verzet - Tine Hens. Collum in MoMagazine - 5 artikelen over project Stijn<br /> ** Geografie --> Care --> Doreen Massey <br /> ** Frans Thisse (sociale geografie) <br /> ** Feminisme --> Solidariteit --> Geography of effects <br /> ** The end of capitalism as we knew it - Graham and Gibson <br /> *** Ethics of the local <br /> *** Are we thinking Marxism <br /> * We moeten ook de andere kant van het verhaal beschrijven, de kant waar we meer kritisch naar kijken<br /> ** Mandy de Wilde - Als meedoen pijn doet <br /> ** Evelien Tonkens en Jan Willem Duyvendak in discussie met Jan Rotmans <br /> * Wij pikten "Imagined community" uit Ash Amin --> waar komt dit vandaan. Verbeelding en sense of place <br /> * Gill Valentine --> Geography of encounter - Contact hypothese <br /> * George Simmel - The Stranger<br /> * Kijk ook naar Cohesie en Segregatie <br /> <br /> ==== '''02.10.2017 - Antwerpen - Stijn, Kim, Petra''' ====<br /> Outline wordt als eerste besproken <br /> * Onvoldoende argumentatie in de outline, deze verder uitbreiden <br /> ** Alleen concepten is niet genoeg om het te argumenteren <br /> ** Geef meer en duidelijkere informatie rondom de keuze voor sociale innovatie, waar is de GAP<br /> ** huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistisch / minimalistisch en transformatief / ....opzoeken).<br /> ** GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> ** Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken. <br /> * Proces is te weinig uitgelegd. Gaat te snel over en heeft meer info en uitleg nodig. <br /> ** Denk aan verschillende processen die er zijn <br /> ** Denk ook aan je positionering. Voor wie schrijven we de teksten <br /> * Als tip kunnen we gaan kijken naar de micro verbanden tussen mensen. Dit is tot nu toe weinig gedaan in de literatuur rondom sociale innovatie en zou dus een innovatieve invalshoek kunnen zijn voor ons onderzoek.<br /> <br /> '''Paper 1''' <br /> <br /> Dit mag een theoretisch paper zijn. Gericht naar en geplaatst in de algemene sociale innovatie literatuur. Zonder data (met case in het achterhoofd). <br /> * We gaan al in de richting van place and community in onze argumentatie. <br /> ** Amin en Massey zijn tot nu toe auteurs en richtingen die niet gelinkt zijn met sociale innovatie. Dit zou een nieuwe invalshoek kunnen zijn. <br /> ** publiek: andere SI onderzoekers <br /> '''Paper 2''' <br /> * Wie is het publiek van dit paper? Waar willen wij iets bereiken met de kennis die we hier hebben? Hier kijken naar andere actoren in het debat. <br /> ** Bestuurswetenschappen zou een richting kunnen zijn waar er verder nog niet veel naar het proces wordt gekeken. <br /> ** lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen? <br /> ** relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn? <br /> ** inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur! <br /> ** etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen. Etnografie en innovatie. <br /> ** Nadeel van die discipline: generieke modellen. <br /> ** Genoemd: intentional neighbouring. Christelijk / bewuste werkwijze/ vanuit overtuiging / werkt dat? <br /> ** concepten: proces: specifieke plaats / hoe kan dat ontmoeten er uit zien / nabijheid <br /> ** proces: individu al noemen / hoe vindt die ontmoeting plaats in specifieke ruimte en komt daar collaboration uit? Hoe? <br /> * NOTE: The Encounter wordt in de sociale wetenschappen theorie altijd gezien als een '''''ontmoeting tussen vreemden.''''' <br /> * Heeft een zwaardere lading; gaat over een specifiek type ontmoeting <br /> * Niet meer dan twee concepten per paper bespreken anders wordt het teveel. Traffic: 1 argument per paper / 2 concepten. Volgend paper: nuance aanbrengen (externe factor). <br /> '''Paper 3'''<br /> <br /> Hier willen we verder inzoomen op de individu. <br /> * Zouden verder in kunnen gaan op de ethiek; Ethics of care (Amin)<br /> ** Wat betekend het "zorgen voor elkaar". De typische rol van de man en de vrouw maar ook geloofsovertuiging; e.g. intentional neighbouring (christelijke mensen die in een achterstandsbuurt gaan wonen en effectief werken aan het opnieuw verbindingen maken tussen mensen om de kwaliteit van leven er weer te verhogen) <br /> ** Kijkt eigenlijk naar het klein individuele proces / ethics in microproces. <br /> ** specifiek: zorgdragen voor elkaar. <br /> ** In literatuur ethics soms gebruikt als alternatief voor solidariteit (feministische literatuur) <br /> ** specifiek kijken naar individuele ervaringen (techniek). <br /> ** link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat: <br /> ** zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie? <br /> * De vraag is dan: '''Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself?''' <br /> * welke concepten hier gebruiken? <br /> '''Paper 4'''<br /> <br /> Zouden willen kijken naar de houding van de politici zelf. Welke relatie moet je aangaan? <br /> * Kunnen eventueel kunnen kijken naar de affiniteit, het gevoel van mensen die in het bestuur zitten. <br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon. <br /> * Kan geplaatst worden in de bestuurswetenschappen en/of beleidswetenschappen. <br /> * Op de lange termijn: luisteren <br /> * Hier vanuit antropologisch perspectief naar kijken / affectief <br /> * keuze: affectieve dimensie (hoe positioneert iemand zich en het project/ welke uitleg wordt gegeven / is iemand authentiek of wil hij mensen voor zijn/haar karretje spannen OF kijken naar waarden en normen. <br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers. Kijkt men daar al naar in de bestuurswetenschappen of de beleidswetenschappen? <br /> '''Paper 5'''<br /> * Als je best practice wordt, wat doet dat dan met je? Wat gebeurd er met je? <br /> * Wat doet het als je wordt uitgekozen, busladingen geïnteresseerden langskomen, je een voorbeeld / succesvol wordt? <br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd <br /> * de rol van plaats <br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie <br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep <br /> * techniek: auto-etnografie <br /> * dilemma's: affectief / interne verhoudingen / exposure <br /> '''Paper 6'''<br /> * Verbinden aan paper 5. <br /> * Auto-etnografie van Petra om te kijken wat het doet met de persoon die dit proces inzet.<br /> ** Ben je een professional of ben je een bewoner?<br /> ** Kan je als professional je afsluiten voor wat er op de plek gebeurd? Stijn denkt dat dit wel kan. Stijn denkt: de professional gaat weg en kent deze reactie niet.<br /> ** Mensen vinden het lastig om verbindingen te blijven leggen met elkaar wanneer de professional weg is: Dit is risicovol, de Encounter is risicovol - Exposure. Professional als object van solidariteit. <br /> ** buffer zijn / risico absorberen <br /> ** pedagogie als discipline? <br /> <br /> Bespreking van de argumentatie die we hadden meegestuurd. <br /> * Alle definities van sociale innovatie bespreken. Beginnen met die van the Young Foundation <br /> * In hoofdstuk 4 maken we een te grote sprong tussen collaboration en social capital. Deze twee zijn nog ver van elkaar verwijderd. Overbruggend social capital zit daar nog wel tussen<br /> ** Als mensen anders zijn is collaboration veel moeilijker, hier is veel meer voor nodig dan wanneer mensen hetzelfde zijn. <br /> ** Putnam - Bowling alone: hoe werkt collaboratie. Decline social capital. Social capital is macro analyse. Wederzijds vertrouwen. collaboratie is samenwerken. <br /> ** Putnam: geen gebrek aan sociaal kapitaal maar: gebrek aan overbruggend sociaal kapitaal. Bij 'de vreemde' is dat veel moeilijker (proffesionals / organisatie / overheid) <br /> * Kijken naar literatuur rondom Ethnographie of innovation & Antropology of innovation <br /> <br /> ==== '''02.10.2017 - Antwerpen - Stijn, Kim, Petra''' ====<br /> Empirisch materiaal doorgenomen.<br /> <br /> Encounter:<br /> <br /> Wat is een encounter? De aard van de interactie die we organiseren?<br /> <br /> Breskens: overheid en coporatie hebben verantwoordelijkheid (vastgesteld / missie) Hoe sluit die aan op de bestaande zorgethiek (van mensen zelf / uit de interviews naar boven komt)? En hoe kunnen de overheid en maatschappelijke organisaties daarop aansluiten?<br /> * paper 1. The Encounter. G.W. Allport The Natur of Prejudice: contacthypothese. Heel bekend en veel literatuur over. Equal status contact. Stijn: Gaat over iets anders dan waar wij naar kijken. Gaat over: eaqual status contact. Daar zijn geen professionals bij betrokken. Betreft contacten buiten interventie perspectief. Maar: wij kunnen het concept losmaken en een nieuwe invulling geven. Wat zjjn de mogelijheden om meer als gelijken samen te komen. Juist wel vanuit een interventie perspectief! Onderzoeken: niet ingaan op vooroordelen (= Allport) maar juist kijken hoe je dit kunt organiseren en de effecten. Heeft ook link met 'affectief burgerschap' van bijvoorbeeld Mandy de Wilde. Die insteek kiezen we niet. Stap 1: literatuur over the encounter erbij zoeken.<br /> * paper 2. The role of Place. Aantonen HOE plaats een rol kan spelen (i.p.v. dat plaats belangrijk is). Voorbeeld besproken dat gemeente denkt dat wijkgebouw de oplossing is in Breskens / de voorzieningen in Veere). Door zelf betekenis te geven. Placemaking. Er is literatuur over 'aging and place'. Discussie: moeten we voorzieningen verplaatsen of daar laten. Veel beleid door bepaald. Maar: is een dure optie. Niet meegaan in de discussie over die twee opties maar: binnen de optie wel daar laten: hoe doe je dat / hoe kun je dat vormgeven? Je kiest die strategie en hoe kun je dat dan doen? Interventie in dit debat! Combinatie maken van 'aging and place' en 'placemaking'.<br /> * paper 5. Best Peactice. Er is veel literatuur over hoe best practices mobiel worden. Rol stigmatisering. Controle over beeldvorming.<br /> * paper 6. Auto-ethnografie. Wat is het effect van....Vanuit actie-perspectief kijken. <br /> <br /> === Geschreven teksten ===<br /> 02.05.2017 Petra de Braal - {{Cite|resource=File:Research_Introduction_-_Petra_de_Braal_Mei_2017.pdf|name=Research Introduction|dialog=process-file-dialog}} <br /> <br /> 14.06.2017 Petra de Braal en Kim Boes - {{Cite|resource=File:Social_innovation_–_Content_and_Process.pdf|name=Social innovation – Content and Process|dialog=process-file-dialog}}''': ''A discussion between Amin and the practical experiences we gained from our projects'''''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Monitoring, toetsing en evalueren ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> == Onderzoekslogboek ==<br /> <br /> Hierin houden wij het proces bij van de verschillende delen van ons onderzoek. <br /> === Aanpak van het verkrijgen van de onderzoeksvragen ===<br /> '''17.04.2017 Eerste onderzoeksvragen/thema's'''<br /> * Social Innovation<br /> ** Social Innovation Process<br /> *** The individual in the process<br /> **** How do they give meaning to their actions?<br /> **** How does this affect the co-production of self?<br /> <br /> '''02.05.2017 Onderzoeksvragen opgesteld in eerste stuk geschreven door Petra''' <br /> * How does reflexivity mediate the agency-structure dynamics in social innovation processes? <br /> * What is the role of narratives in the social innovation process? <br /> * What is the role of identity dynamics in the social innovation process? <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het opstellen van het onderzoeksplan ===<br /> <br /> ==== Eerste versie onderzoeksplan ====<br /> '''Email Stijn 28.08.2017''' <br /> <br /> ''"Bereiden jullie een document met een tijdsplanning voor jullie doctoraat voor?'' <br /> <br /> ''Kunnen jullie ook al een en ander op papier zetten over de structuur van jullie doctoraat? Mijn voorstel zou zijn dat jullie op artikels doctoreren (omvat een inleidend hoofdstuk die doctoraat kadert en positioneert in wetenschappelijk debat, minimaal vier papers met telkens een argument dat op basis van empirische gegevens wordt onderbouwd en een conclusie). De werkzaamheden kunnen zo in kleinere pakketjes opgedeeld kunnen worden, wat me in jullie geval meer hanteerbaar lijkt. Het zou goed zijn mochten jullie al eens nadenken wat jullie in elk van die hoofdstukken zouden kwijt willen (argument, dimensie van de algemene problematiek, welke case). Dit mag tentatief zijn, maar het zal een eerste idee geven van wat nodig is voor het doctoraat."''<br /> <br /> '''Reactie 02.10.2017'''<br /> <br /> ===== '''Paper 1''': Setting the scene for social innovation =====<br /> <u>Aim: Critical discussion between the current literature and our secondary data</u><br /> * Argumentation:<br /> ** Social innovation is under represented as a practise in the innovation research literature (Cajaiba-Santana 2014). However, increasingly the focus shifts also into the direction of social innovation centralised around tackling issues affecting society at large (Phillips et al. 2015). While it is recognised social innovation is a vital practise in todays society (Grimm et al. 2013), scholars ask for more research in this field (Mulgan 2006; Cajaiba-Santana 2014; Phillips et al. 2015). <br /> * Method - Secondary data<br /> ** Case: Ulrum & dZH <br /> <br /> ===== '''Paper 2''': The process of social innovation =====<br /> <u>Aim:</u> <br /> * Argumentation:<br /> ** While the literature on the business innovation process has been explored in-depth over the last decades, research focussing on the social innovation process is to date limited (Lettice and Parekh 2010; Phillips et al. 2015). <br /> * Concepts discussed:<br /> ** The encounter<br /> * Method - Case study method. Combination of secondary data (official documents, published articles, blog, etc.), interviews, and focus group<br /> ** Case: Combination of the data sets Ulrum & dZH <br /> <br /> ===== '''Paper 3''': Practises of care =====<br /> <u>Aim:</u><br /> * Argumentation:<br /> * Concepts discussed:<br /> ** <br /> * Method - Case study method. Combination of secondary data (official documents, published articles, blog, etc.), interviews, and focus group<br /> ** Case: Combination of the data sets Ulrum & dZH <br /> <br /> ===== '''Paper 4''': Politics of care - Governance =====<br /> <u>Aim:</u><br /> * Argumentation:<br /> * Concepts discussed:<br /> ** Agency<br /> ** Policy making<br /> * Method - Case study method. Combination of secondary data (official documents, published articles, blog, etc.), interviews, and focus group<br /> ** Case: Combination of the data sets Ulrum & dZH <br /> <br /> ===== '''Timeframe (version september 2017)''' =====<br /> '''Year 1 --> October 2018'''<br /> * Write theoretical paper with a critical discussion between current literature and secondary data <br /> * Collect data <br /> ** Conduct interviews<br /> ** Transcribe interviews <br /> ** Part analyses <br /> '''Year 2+3 = 27 months''' <br /> * Publish three empirical papers <br /> * Extra months could be included taken from the fourth year <br /> '''Year 4 --> 6 - 9 months''' <br /> * Write introduction and conclusion<br /> * Finishing touch <br /> '''Finish by December 2021'''<br /> <br /> {{Light Context<br /> |Supercontext=PR 00139<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Toppage=Process<br /> |Sequence number=1<br /> |Context type=Situation<br /> |Heading=Process<br /> |Show referred by=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=PR_00144&diff=49376 PR 00144 2017-11-13T19:23:01Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>== Keywords to describe our research: ==<br /> * Cross-disciplinary approach to study social innovation<br /> <br /> == Abstracts ==<br /> Identify the purpose (motivation)<br /> * Why did you decide to do this study or project?<br /> * How did you conduct your research?<br /> * Why is this research and your findings important?<br /> * Why should someone read your entire essay?<br /> * This section should include the importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the impact it might have if successful.<br /> Explain the problem at hand (problem statement)<br /> * What problem is your research trying to better understand or solve?<br /> * What is the scope of your study - a general problem, or something specific?<br /> * What is your main claim or argument?<br /> Describe the method (approach)<br /> <br /> Give your conclusion<br /> * What are the implications of your work?<br /> * Are your results general or very specific?<br /> <br /> Outline --> Introduction - Body - Conclusion. Two paragraphs up to one page of text. ~ 300 words. <br /> <br /> === Paper 1 - Theoretical paper ===<br /> * De huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistische / minimalistisch en transformative / radical opzoeken).<br /> ** Minimalist - Maximalist: "A third type of radical innovation has been elaborated by Mangabeira Unger. He distinguishes between '''minimalist social innovations''' which give a human face to an otherwise unsupportable situation, and '''maximalist social innovations''' that aim at deep changes. ”<br /> ** Transformative - Radical <br /> * GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> * Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken.<br /> * Combinatie met Human and Social Geography<br /> * '''PLACE'''<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> As the position of the nation state has weakened with decentralisation as result, local socially innovative actions have come to the attention of a plethora of actors. As a means to an end and an end in itself, social innovation has increasingly gained the interest of academics, practitioners and policy makers alike. Much has been said about the definition of social innovation and also the outcomes have been discussed at large. The process dimension of socially innovative actions is less explored. Especially the micro level with the individual as a central point of focus has gained little to no attention in the current discussion. <br /> <br /> Consequently, this study focusses on what is happening on a micro level during the process of social innovation. More specifically, this first paper enhances the discussion by introducing the concept of '''place.''' Decentralisation has enhanced the position of place. As a location with a purpose is it perceived as something people take shared responsibility of. It presupposes a position of equivalence and pluralism. Place is where the development of new, or the transformation of, social relations takes place, being at the centre of socially innovative actions. <br /> <br /> In order to explore the concept of place in the process of social innovation, this study takes on a cross-disciplinary approach and draws on the human and social geography literature. The results are relevant for researchers, practitioners and policy makers interested in the greater picture of social innovation <br /> <br /> ''Social innovation, as a means to an end and an end it itself, has increasingly gained the interest of academics, practisioners and policy makers alike. The discussion has largely focussed on the goals of social innovation as well as on finding common ground regarding the definition. Social innovation addresses local social needs and global societal challenges. It does so by using social means through the development of new, or the transformation of, social relations. These socially innovative actions are driven by different processes to enable groups to better satisfy their human needs and improve their living conditions.'' <br /> <br /> ''Instead of joining the greater discussion on the content, outcomes and definition of social innovation, this study focusses on the process dimension. More specifically, it aims at elucidating the processes of social learning, individual and collective awareness rising, and socio-political mobilisation. At a microlevel it explores the connections between the different actors partaking in socially innovative actions.'' <br /> <br /> === Paper 2 - The process of social innovation ===<br /> * lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen?<br /> * relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn?<br /> * inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur!<br /> * etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen (public administration). Etnografie en innovatie.<br /> * '''THE ENCOUNTER + NARRATIVE'''<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> While previous studies often focussed on the organisational level, this study explores the social innovation process on the micro level of the individual. Instead of looking at leadership and the capabilities and competences of human change agents, this study focusses on the relations between the individual people taking part in the social innovation process. <br /> <br /> Moulaert: "''Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organisational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behaviour."'' <br /> <br /> In vergelijk met Zapf (2003, p.427) ''"...process of change in the social structure of a society in its constitutive institutions, cultural patterns, associated social actions and conscious awareness"'' <br /> <br /> .... Concepts? The encounter &...? <br /> <br /> overdenkingen plaats: <br /> <br /> Greep natiestaten verzwakt en decentralisaties -> plaats belangrijker. Relationeel. Verknoping van relaties. Groepen delen weinig behalve de plaats waar ze samenkomen. Gedeelde verantwoordelijkheid. Plaats -> nieuwe gemeenschappelijkheid. Laagdrempelig. Vanuit nabijheid. Afhankelijkheid (krimp?) -> lotsverbondenheid. Samen verantwoordelijkheid nemen voor een plaats veronderstelt een positie van gelijkwaardigheid. <br /> <br /> Overheid: gelijke kansen. Democratische plicht om om te investeren in een publiek ontmoetingsstructuur. Ook: Potentieel van plaatgebaseerde vormen van care. Burgerschap als prijktijk. Wat mensen concreet doen. Toegenomen belang van plaats in het organiseren van ons samenleven.<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for researchers and practisioners in the public administration discipline. <br /> <br /> "Social innovation derives from bringing together different actors that normally do not maintain relationships or only in direct conflict. Reorganise the connections between different actors - mutual learning (narratives?)" (Klein 2010). --> '''Link this with "The encounter", link to human/social geography''' <br /> <br /> === Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself? ===<br /> <br /> * link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat:<br /> * zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie?<br /> * '''CARE + THE COMMONS'''<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Role of ethics in micro practices<br /> <br /> Concept of ‘care’ sometimes used as an alternative to the concept of solidarity<br /> <br /> Specific focus on ethics: how do people take care of each other; ethics of care<br /> <br /> Ethics of care: looks at ethics which pays more attention to emotional and private role of ethical judgments.<br /> <br /> Look at the actual practices in everyday life settings and grass-roots movements<br /> <br /> Care for each other plays everywhere; we look at how it works in neighbourhoods and in the family. <br /> <br /> Focus on the individual experiences.<br /> <br /> Why: better understanding of how all those individual choices work through the way society changes.<br /> <br /> Again: role encounter and place: We need to think more carefully about which types of encounters are sought, and by whom, and which are avoided, and by whom.<br /> <br /> The emphasis is placed not just on immediate contact experiences, but also on how peoples accrued histories of social experience and material circumstances may also contribute to their feelings about different sorts of encounters. In particular, how do 'real' and 'imagined' feelings and practices of care inhibit or open up the possibilities that a bridge being made between people's attitudes to particular individuals and to wider social groups?<br /> <br /> aim: to recognize cares and different responsibilities formed in material, technological, symbolic and imagined space. ....can be extended as a form of interest in the... (commons?<br /> <br /> (To scan the landscape for evidence and proposals for new ways of gathering diversity into a functioning ‘commons’. <br /> <br /> Commons: seen as:) <br /> <br /> Argument link with social innovation: the role of ethics in community building: <br /> <br /> Not a focus on the innovative individual but: <br /> <br /> are the different ways to care for each other that arise in the community a social innovation in itself? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 4 - Politics of care ===<br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon.<br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers.<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with socifik governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. (focus: decision makers’ and civil servants’ ) capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> In this paper we look at political responsability and political practice. What might a politics of care be? How might local politics participate in that ethics of care and building new communities and collaboration? Is this paper we will examine the affective dimension of political subjects and opportunities.<br /> <br /> Practical ethics<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with specific governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. decision makers’ and civil servants’ capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> definition: Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organizational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behavior. <br /> <br /> Instead of focussing at the code or the principles, the norms and the values, we focus at the cultivation of the ethical person, the self-formation as an ethical subject involving practices of forming the ethical political subject.<br /> <br /> Which attitudes and practices could make possible ethically sensitive, negotiated settlements between different groups and individuals in the collaboration process and the construction of communities?<br /> <br /> Focus on the attitude of a divers set of policy makers. Not in an administrative sense.<br /> <br /> Antropologie of policy makers: a more informal and affective perspective:<br /> <br /> explore some of the ways and means in which antropologie might begin to show more attitude and greater determination in mobilizing action and leading change in an organizational setting<br /> <br /> the importance of narrative in interpreting human meaning and experience + understanding performance and action itself<br /> <br /> missing part: all about the research significance of narrative, narrative analyses, not its practical significance. The role that narrative and stories might play in mobilizing action + bringing about change (mobilizing narrative)<br /> <br /> Social innovation: instead of looking at shared norms and values we ….a closer look into the process. Not follow a pre given set of norms and values but looking at the process of altering the meaning of what is is to be social.<br /> <br /> will enable us to identify more precisely the problems associated with…..as the are constructed in the proces of social innovation. We focus on the process dimension of SI as this dimension is most relevant to the governance challenges….<br /> <br /> SI is not only innovation that is directed at social goals but also uses social means. Social means refer to the development of new or transformation of social relations. <br /> <br /> Look at the interaction among divers conscious actors on a small scale. <br /> <br /> Grassroots movements places where they excercise their responsibility. A close look into micropolitical opportunities. <br /> <br /> Local forms of social innovation tend to highlight the need for necognition and reprensentation and could hence help to improve conventional welfare state politics. <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 5 - What happens when you become the best practise ===<br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd<br /> * de rol van plaats<br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie<br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Unit of analysis: localized social innovations (against the restructuring of the well-fare state) <br /> <br /> and include its spatial form and institutional embedding<br /> <br /> best pracice: Ulrum (+ dZH?)<br /> <br /> we approach localized forms of SI against the backdrop of the restructering of the wellfare state + new social challenges (participation and joint decision making?)<br /> <br /> focus: governance challenges + dilemma’s <br /> <br /> vraag naar participatie en inspraak: nieuwe uitdagingen. Ulrum geeft door opzet en veelheid aan partners mogelijkheden. Not focus on the intervention or action in isolation but include its spatial form and institutional embedding. That is its multi scaler and networked nature as a complex assemblage of actors, institutions and instruments, as an intrinsic part of the SI process. <br /> <br /> the bottum up perspective (crucial for mobilizing resources (how and which ones) and networks but the connection with top down practices is of equal importance. <br /> <br /> proces: risks<br /> <br /> best practice -> exposure -> effects?<br /> <br /> Internal relations (+ encounter with the stranger)<br /> <br /> Leaving space to citizens’ and communities’ self-organisation -> risks for:<br /> <br /> the local organisation (focus local promoters): what happens with internal relations, living up to expectations, pressure (subsidies), timeframes and publicity <br /> <br /> public institutions (focus key persons in strategic public institutions): their biggest challenge is to create favourable conditions + risks (inequality, keeping control over exclusionary processes, avoiding risks of delegation and passive subsidiary).<br /> <br /> Influenced by political pressures which are again influenced by socio-economic and socio-demographic challenges like legitimacy and inclusiveness. Look into the posibilities and the boundaries of citizenship.<br /> <br /> Actors putting forward SI initiatives should learn to actively act (on different scales)<br /> <br /> the question is: how is it possible to create a good balance between public care and responsibility. <br /> <br /> Place making: look at the potential of place-based forms of solidarity and care. Recent thinking about citizenship. Look at what people actually do. Who is active in the public space? Increased importance of place in our society. Making place becomes an important project.<br /> <br /> functions as a microprocess that makes macropolitical settlement possible<br /> <br /> a better uderstanding of the balance among social, manegerial and political aims, devoting a special attention to responsability and accountability, both within the grass roots movement and public institutions as well as their partnerships with different kind of actors. (?)<br /> <br /> Closer look into practice of social innovation: to identify more precisely the specific problems associated; a closer look at the collaboration, interdependence, the awareness of it and the actual creation of active trust and reflexive engagement. <br /> <br /> Analyse how these tensions play out in actual practices as they are constructed in practice of social innovation.<br /> <br /> Also contextual conditions that facilitate or hinder si.<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 6 - Auto-Ethnography ===<br /> * Professional als object van solidariteit.<br /> * buffer zijn / risico absorberen<br /> * pedagogie als discipline?<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Another way of making personal experiences relevant for .... <br /> <br /> Auto-etnografie: <br /> <br /> Kracht auto-etnografie: inzicht verschaffen in de doorwerking van gebeurtenissen, maatregelen, wetgeving, normen en waarden en concrete levens maar ook inzicht in de totstandkoming van onderzoeksresultaten en conclusies.<br /> <br /> Analytische auto-etnografie als methode?<br /> <br /> encounter with 'the stranger'<br /> <br /> role of intermediary<br /> <br /> Role facilitator / intermediary in SI needs: managing and creating innovative and productive contexts to value each others stenghts and avoid each other weaknesses. <br /> <br /> Experiment with new theories, techniques, methods of research and, in this case: representation.<br /> <br /> Massey: "Unavoidably we had to think about the politics and ethics of out academic 'locality'. And here choice looms as a daily challenge: a choice of the theorist, not to try to 'get is right' but to persue inventiveness"<br /> <br /> Opvallend is de centrale ondersteunende rol van 'professionals' en 'publieke ontmoetingsstructuur'. De positie van professionals (in 4 politics hier anders bedoeld). Rol van reflectie en machtsverhoudingen (bestendigen of prioriteiten van buiten opleggen). Het is echter belangrijk om deze rol zichtbaar te maken (alleen al omdat het mythes over het spontane karakter van zorg voor elkaar en directe solidariteit onderuit haalt). De plaatsgebonden vormen van directe vormen van solidariteit (care) zijn via de financiering van professionals en ontmoetingsstructuur sterk verweven met de indirecte solidariteit (care) van de verzorgingsstaat. In Ulrum ook: Ook andere sporen van overheidssfinanciering: het gebruik maken van publiek gefinancierde onderzoeksinstellingen. Sterk verweven in de praktijk (indirect en direct). <br /> <br /> Zie ook Kok: "de overheid was nog nooit zo betrokken"<br /> <br /> Ethnografie als methode: Ulrum: aan den lijve kunnen ondervinden hoe ‘het’ er aan toe gaat + hoe (het systeem) werkt. Zie ook best-practice zijn. Meer inzicht verkregen in de interactie tussen de verschillende actoren / vertegenwoordigers van….<br /> <br /> Jeff Ferrell zet zich met zijn auto-etnografische benadering af tegen de positivistische onderzoeksbenadering die geen oog heeft voor de ‘situated logic and emotion which define criminal experience’ (1998: 20). Hij stelt dat deze benadering meer recht doet aan de dagelijkse praktijk van participerende observatie. Hij is dan ook een voorstander van wat hij ‘true confessions’ noemt: ‘accounts of field research that in fact undermine absolutist notions of scholarly truth by incorporating situationally truthfully representations of field researchers’ lived and limiting experiences’.<br /> <br /> Ferrells auto-etnografische benadering, die in dienst staat van het beschrijven van de sociale wereld van ''…'', komt tot uiting in drie aspecten: (a) representatie, (b) analyse en (c) de rol van de onderzoeker in de tekst.<br /> <br /> De verdiensten van de auto-etnografie (als vanzelfsprekend onderdeel van de etnografie) hebben betrekking op:<br /> <br /> 1. het integreren van de persoonlijke ervaringen van onderzoekers in teksten om zo te komen tot een rijkere beschrijving van de sociale werelden die zij onderzoeken;<br /> <br /> 2. het expliciteren van de rol van de onderzoeker in publicaties; en<br /> <br /> 3. het ontwikkelen van nieuwe (meer aansprekende) vormen van representatie.<br /> <br /> Ferrell geeft aan dat auto-etnografische inzichten vooral ontwikkeld kunnen worden als onderzoekers zelf zo veel als mogelijk deelnemen aan de sociale wereld die zij bestuderen. Ferrell gaat hierin veel verder dan de meeste onderzoekers: ‘I will try not to hide behind the cloak of a researcher or scholar, but rather participate as fully as possible in these risky social processes’ (Ferrell, 1998: 21). In feite komt zijn doel tijdens veldwerk neer op ''going native'' (drie jaar lang elke maand een week daar gewoond)<br /> <br /> alle ruimte geven aan de ''day-to-day reality'' van de ''…'' en richt zich hierbij op de ‘situational meanings and emotions – its moments of pleasure and pain, its emergent logics and excitement’ (Ferrell, 1998: 24-25). Doel ligt vooral in het zo levensecht mogelijk beschrijven van de sociale wereld van / process van SI''…''. Wel reflecteren op de eerder genoemde concepten. Bijvoorbeeld: <br /> <br /> hoe de bewoners met hun handelingen betekenis kunnen geven aan hun dorp. <br /> <br /> ook: nadere analyse van: interacties tussen vreemden in de openbare ruimte (Müller, 2011).<br /> <br /> Ferrell duidelijk dat auto-etnografie vooral als methode kan werken wanneer er sprake is van een proces van ''going native'', waarin onderzoekers worden geconfronteerd met nieuwe ervaringen die afwijken van wat zij gewend zijn. Juist door de eigen emotionele reactie op een nieuwe sociale situatie serieus te nemen en daarover na te denken kan inzicht worden verkregen in cruciale aspecten van de te onderzoeken sociale wereld.<br /> <br /> In het spanningsveld van distantie en betrokkenheid vervreemding en toe-eigening worden de vanzelfsprekendheden (van de onderzoeker en de informanten) in denken, voelen en doen ontdekt en inzichtelijk gemaakt.<br /> <br /> The results of this research are relevant for.......{{Project config}}<br /> {{Project<br /> |Supercontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Project type=SSM, Standaard<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Name=Papers & Articles<br /> |Start date=2017/07/06<br /> |Summary=Written papers and articles<br /> |Show summary=Ja<br /> |Show navigation tree=Ja<br /> |Show sub projects=Ja<br /> |Show participants=Nee<br /> |Show sources=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=PR_00144&diff=49087 PR 00144 2017-11-05T16:16:57Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>== Keywords to describe our research: ==<br /> * Cross-disciplinary approach to study social innovation<br /> <br /> == Abstracts ==<br /> Identify the purpose (motivation)<br /> * Why did you decide to do this study or project?<br /> * How did you conduct your research?<br /> * Why is this research and your findings important?<br /> * Why should someone read your entire essay?<br /> * This section should include the importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the impact it might have if successful.<br /> Explain the problem at hand (problem statement)<br /> * What problem is your research trying to better understand or solve?<br /> * What is the scope of your study - a general problem, or something specific?<br /> * What is your main claim or argument?<br /> Describe the method (approach)<br /> <br /> Give your conclusion<br /> * What are the implications of your work?<br /> * Are your results general or very specific?<br /> <br /> Outline --> Introduction - Body - Conclusion. Two paragraphs up to one page of text. ~ 300 words. <br /> <br /> === Paper 1 - Theoretical paper ===<br /> * De huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistische / minimalistisch en transformative / radical opzoeken).<br /> ** Minimalist - Maximalist: "A third type of radical innovation has been elaborated by Mangabeira Unger. He distinguishes between '''minimalist social innovations''' which give a human face to an otherwise unsupportable situation, and '''maximalist social innovations''' that aim at deep changes. ”<br /> ** Transformative - Radical <br /> * GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> * Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken.<br /> * Combinatie met Human and Social Geography<br /> * '''PLACE'''<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Social innovation, as a means to an end and an end it itself, has increasingly gained the interest of academics, practisioners and policy makers alike. The discussion has largely focussed on the goals of social innovation as well as on finding common ground regarding the definition. Social innovation addresses local social needs and global societal challenges. It does so by using social means through the development of new, or the transformation of, social relations. These socially innovative actions are driven by different processes to enable groups to better satisfy their human needs and improve their living conditions. <br /> <br /> Instead of joining the greater discussion on the content, outcomes and definition of social innovation, this study focusses on the process dimension. More specifically, it aims at elucidating the processes of social learning, individual and collective awareness rising, and socio-political mobilisation. At a microlevel it explores the connections between the different actors partaking in socially innovative actions. <br /> <br /> In order to explore the process dimension of social innovation this study takes on a cross-disciplinary approach and draws on human and social geography literature. More specifically, this theoretical paper enhances the discussion on the process of social innovation by introducing the concepts of '''place and community (? en dan later de rol van narrative en encounter?)'''. <br /> <br /> This will extend the <br /> <br /> It aims at elucidating what happens during the process.<br /> <br /> .... a closer focus on the process <br /> <br /> ....This study.... takes a social geography lens by drawing on the concepts of place and community <br /> <br /> .... looks at micro connections between individuals.... <br /> <br /> .... a cross-disciplinary approach between policy administration and human & social geography <br /> <br /> "Social innovation derives from bringing together different actors that normally do not maintain relationships or only in direct conflict. Reorganise the connections between different actors - mutual learning (narratives?)" (Klein 2010). --> '''Link this with "The encounter", link to human/social geography''' <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for....... researchers, practisioners and policy makers interested in the greater picture of social innovation <br /> <br /> === Paper 2 - The process of social innovation ===<br /> * lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen?<br /> * relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn?<br /> * inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur!<br /> * etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen (public administration). Etnografie en innovatie.<br /> * '''THE ENCOUNTER + NARRATIVE'''<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> While previous studies often focussed on the organisational level, this study explores the social innovation process on the micro level of the individual. Instead of looking at leadership and the capabilities and competences of human change agents, this study focusses on the relations between the individual people taking part in the social innovation process. <br /> <br /> Moulaert: "''Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organisational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behaviour."'' <br /> <br /> In vergelijk met Zapf (2003, p.427) ''"...process of change in the social structure of a society in its constitutive institutions, cultural patterns, associated social actions and conscious awareness"'' <br /> <br /> .... Concepts? The encounter &...? <br /> <br /> overdenkingen plaats: <br /> <br /> Greep natiestaten verzwakt en decentralisaties -> plaats belangrijker. Relationeel. Verknoping van relaties. Groepen delen weinig behalve de plaats waar ze samenkomen. Gedeelde verantwoordelijkheid. Plaats -> nieuwe gemeenschappelijkheid. Laagdrempelig. Vanuit nabijheid. Afhankelijkheid (krimp?) -> lotsverbondenheid. Samen verantwoordelijkheid nemen voor een plaats veronderstelt een positie van gelijkwaardigheid. <br /> <br /> Overheid: gelijke kansen. Democratische plicht om om te investeren in een publiek ontmoetingsstructuur. Ook: Potentieel van plaatgebaseerde vormen van care. Burgerschap als prijktijk. Wat mensen concreet doen. Toegenomen belang van plaats in het organiseren van ons samenleven.<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for researchers and practisioners in the public administration discipline. <br /> <br /> === Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself? ===<br /> <br /> * link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat:<br /> * zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie?<br /> * '''CARE + COMMUNITY'''<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Role of ethics in micro practices<br /> <br /> Concept of ‘care’ sometimes used as an alternative to the concept of solidarity<br /> <br /> Specific focus on ethics: how do people take care of each other; ethics of care<br /> <br /> Ethics of care: looks at ethics which pays more attention to emotional and private role of ethical judgments.<br /> <br /> Look at the actual practices in everyday life settings and grass-roots movements<br /> <br /> Care for each other plays everywhere; we look at how it works in neighbourhoods and in the family. <br /> <br /> Focus on the individual experiences.<br /> <br /> Why: better understanding of how all those individual choices work through the way society changes.<br /> <br /> Again: role encounter and place: We need to think more carefully about which types of encounters are sought, and by whom, and which are avoided, and by whom.<br /> <br /> The emphasis is placed not just on immediate contact experiences, but also on how peoples accrued histories of social experience and material circumstances may also contribute to their feelings about different sorts of encounters. In particular, how do 'real' and 'imagined' feelings and practices of care inhibit or open up the possibilities that a bridge being made between people's attitudes to particular individuals and to wider social groups?<br /> <br /> aim: to recognize cares and different responsibilities formed in material, technological, symbolic and imagined space. ....can be extended as a form of interest in the... (commons?<br /> <br /> (To scan the landscape for evidence and proposals for new ways of gathering diversity into a functioning ‘commons’. <br /> <br /> Commons: seen as:) <br /> <br /> Argument link with social innovation: the role of ethics in community building: <br /> <br /> Not a focus on the innovative individual but: <br /> <br /> are the different ways to care for each other that arise in the community a social innovation in itself? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 4 - Politics of care ===<br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon.<br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers.<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with socifik governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. (focus: decision makers’ and civil servants’ ) capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> In this paper we look at political responsability and political practice. What might a politics of care be? How might local politics participate in that ethics of care and building new communities and collaboration? Is this paper we will examine the affective dimension of political subjects and opportunities.<br /> <br /> Practical ethics<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with specific governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. decision makers’ and civil servants’ capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> definition: Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organizational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behavior. <br /> <br /> Instead of focussing at the code or the principles, the norms and the values, we focus at the cultivation of the ethical person, the self-formation as an ethical subject involving practices of forming the ethical political subject.<br /> <br /> Which attitudes and practices could make possible ethically sensitive, negotiated settlements between different groups and individuals in the collaboration process and the construction of communities?<br /> <br /> Focus on the attitude of a divers set of policy makers. Not in an administrative sense.<br /> <br /> Antropologie of policy makers: a more informal and affective perspective:<br /> <br /> explore some of the ways and means in which antropologie might begin to show more attitude and greater determination in mobilizing action and leading change in an organizational setting<br /> <br /> the importance of narrative in interpreting human meaning and experience + understanding performance and action itself<br /> <br /> missing part: all about the research significance of narrative, narrative analyses, not its practical significance. The role that narrative and stories might play in mobilizing action + bringing about change (mobilizing narrative)<br /> <br /> Social innovation: instead of looking at shared norms and values we ….a closer look into the process. Not follow a pre given set of norms and values but looking at the process of altering the meaning of what is is to be social.<br /> <br /> will enable us to identify more precisely the problems associated with…..as the are constructed in the proces of social innovation. We focus on the process dimension of SI as this dimension is most relevant to the governance challenges….<br /> <br /> SI is not only innovation that is directed at social goals but also uses social means. Social means refer to the development of new or transformation of social relations. <br /> <br /> Look at the interaction among divers conscious actors on a small scale. <br /> <br /> Grassroots movements places where they excercise their responsibility. A close look into micropolitical opportunities. <br /> <br /> Local forms of social innovation tend to highlight the need for necognition and reprensentation and could hence help to improve conventional welfare state politics. <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 5 - What happens when you become the best practise ===<br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd<br /> * de rol van plaats<br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie<br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Unit of analysis: localized social innovations (against the restructuring of the well-fare state) <br /> <br /> and include its spatial form and institutional embedding<br /> <br /> best pracice: Ulrum (+ dZH?)<br /> <br /> we approach localized forms of SI against the backdrop of the restructering of the wellfare state + new social challenges (participation and joint decision making?)<br /> <br /> focus: governance challenges + dilemma’s <br /> <br /> proces: risks<br /> <br /> best practice -> exposure -> effects?<br /> <br /> Internal relations (+ encounter with the stranger)<br /> <br /> Leaving space to citizens’ and communities’ self-organisation -> risks for:<br /> <br /> the local organisation (focus local promoters): what happens with internal relations, living up to expectations, pressure (subsidies), timeframes and publicity <br /> <br /> public institutions (focus key persons in strategic public institutions): their biggest challenge is to create favourable conditions + risks (inequality, keeping control over exclusionary processes, avoiding risks of delegation and passive subsidiary).<br /> <br /> Influenced by political pressures which are again influenced by socio-economic and socio-demographic challenges like legitimacy and inclusiveness. Look into the posibilities and the boundaries of citizenship.<br /> <br /> Actors putting forward SI initiatives should learn to actively act (on different scales)<br /> <br /> the question is: how is it possible to create a good balance between public care and responsibility. <br /> <br /> Place making: look at the potential of place-based forms of solidarity and care. Recent thinking about citizenship. Look at what people actually do. Who is active in the public space? Increased importance of place in our society. Making place becomes an important project.<br /> <br /> functions as a microprocess that makes macropolitical settlement possible<br /> <br /> a better uderstanding of the balance among social, manegerial and political aims, devoting a special attention to responsability and accountability, both within the grass roots movement and public institutions as well as their partnerships with different kind of actors. (?)<br /> <br /> Closer look into practice of social innovation: to identify more precisely the specific problems associated; a closer look at the collaboration, interdependence, the awareness of it and the actual creation of active trust and reflexive engagement. <br /> <br /> Analyse how these tensions play out in actual practices as they are constructed in practice of social innovation.<br /> <br /> Also contextual conditions that facilitate or hinder si.<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 6 - Auto-Ethnography ===<br /> * Professional als object van solidariteit.<br /> * buffer zijn / risico absorberen<br /> * pedagogie als discipline?<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Another way of making personal experiences relevant for .... <br /> <br /> Auto-etnografie: <br /> <br /> Kracht auto-etnografie: inzicht verschaffen in de doorwerking van gebeurtenissen, maatregelen, wetgeving, normen en waarden en concrete levens maar ook inzicht in de totstandkoming van onderzoeksresultaten en conclusies.<br /> <br /> Analytische auto-etnografie als methode?<br /> <br /> encounter with 'the stranger'<br /> <br /> role of intermediary<br /> <br /> Role facilitator / intermediary in SI needs: managing and creating innovative and productive contexts to value each others stenghts and avoid each other weaknesses. <br /> <br /> Experiment with new theories, techniques, methods of research and, in this case: representation.<br /> <br /> Massey: "Unavoidably we had to think about the politics and ethics of out academic 'locality'. And here choice looms as a daily challenge: a choice of the theorist, not to try to 'get is right' but to persue inventiveness"<br /> <br /> Opvallend is de centrale ondersteunende rol van 'professionals' en 'publieke ontmoetingsstructuur'. De positie van professionals (in 4 politics hier anders bedoeld). Rol van reflectie en machtsverhoudingen (bestendigen of prioriteiten van buiten opleggen). Het is echter belangrijk om deze rol zichtbaar te maken (alleen al omdat het mythes over het spontane karakter van zorg voor elkaar en directe solidariteit onderuit haalt). De plaatsgebonden vormen van directe vormen van solidariteit (care) zijn via de financiering van professionals en ontmoetingsstructuur sterk verweven met de indirecte solidariteit (care) van de verzorgingsstaat. In Ulrum ook: Ook andere sporen van overheidssfinanciering: het gebruik maken van publiek gefinancierde onderzoeksinstellingen. Sterk verweven in de praktijk (indirect en direct). <br /> <br /> Zie ook Kok: "de overheid was nog nooit zo betrokken"<br /> <br /> Ethnografie als methode: Ulrum: aan den lijve kunnen ondervinden hoe ‘het’ er aan toe gaat + hoe (het systeem) werkt. Zie ook best-practice zijn. Meer inzicht verkregen in de interactie tussen de verschillende actoren / vertegenwoordigers van….<br /> <br /> Jeff Ferrell zet zich met zijn auto-etnografische benadering af tegen de positivistische onderzoeksbenadering die geen oog heeft voor de ‘situated logic and emotion which define criminal experience’ (1998: 20). Hij stelt dat deze benadering meer recht doet aan de dagelijkse praktijk van participerende observatie. Hij is dan ook een voorstander van wat hij ‘true confessions’ noemt: ‘accounts of field research that in fact undermine absolutist notions of scholarly truth by incorporating situationally truthfully representations of field researchers’ lived and limiting experiences’.<br /> <br /> Ferrells auto-etnografische benadering, die in dienst staat van het beschrijven van de sociale wereld van ''…'', komt tot uiting in drie aspecten: (a) representatie, (b) analyse en (c) de rol van de onderzoeker in de tekst.<br /> <br /> De verdiensten van de auto-etnografie (als vanzelfsprekend onderdeel van de etnografie) hebben betrekking op:<br /> <br /> 1. het integreren van de persoonlijke ervaringen van onderzoekers in teksten om zo te komen tot een rijkere beschrijving van de sociale werelden die zij onderzoeken;<br /> <br /> 2. het expliciteren van de rol van de onderzoeker in publicaties; en<br /> <br /> 3. het ontwikkelen van nieuwe (meer aansprekende) vormen van representatie.<br /> <br /> Ferrell geeft aan dat auto-etnografische inzichten vooral ontwikkeld kunnen worden als onderzoekers zelf zo veel als mogelijk deelnemen aan de sociale wereld die zij bestuderen. Ferrell gaat hierin veel verder dan de meeste onderzoekers: ‘I will try not to hide behind the cloak of a researcher or scholar, but rather participate as fully as possible in these risky social processes’ (Ferrell, 1998: 21). In feite komt zijn doel tijdens veldwerk neer op ''going native'' (drie jaar lang elke maand een week daar gewoond)<br /> <br /> alle ruimte geven aan de ''day-to-day reality'' van de ''…'' en richt zich hierbij op de ‘situational meanings and emotions – its moments of pleasure and pain, its emergent logics and excitement’ (Ferrell, 1998: 24-25). Doel ligt vooral in het zo levensecht mogelijk beschrijven van de sociale wereld van / process van SI''…''. Wel reflecteren op de eerder genoemde concepten. Bijvoorbeeld: <br /> <br /> hoe de bewoners met hun handelingen betekenis kunnen geven aan hun dorp. <br /> <br /> ook: nadere analyse van: interacties tussen vreemden in de openbare ruimte (Müller, 2011).<br /> <br /> Ferrell duidelijk dat auto-etnografie vooral als methode kan werken wanneer er sprake is van een proces van ''going native'', waarin onderzoekers worden geconfronteerd met nieuwe ervaringen die afwijken van wat zij gewend zijn. Juist door de eigen emotionele reactie op een nieuwe sociale situatie serieus te nemen en daarover na te denken kan inzicht worden verkregen in cruciale aspecten van de te onderzoeken sociale wereld.<br /> <br /> In het spanningsveld van distantie en betrokkenheid vervreemding en toe-eigening worden de vanzelfsprekendheden (van de onderzoeker en de informanten) in denken, voelen en doen ontdekt en inzichtelijk gemaakt.<br /> <br /> The results of this research are relevant for.......{{Project config}}<br /> {{Project<br /> |Supercontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Project type=SSM, Standaard<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Name=Papers & Articles<br /> |Start date=2017/07/06<br /> |Summary=Written papers and articles<br /> |Show summary=Ja<br /> |Show navigation tree=Ja<br /> |Show sub projects=Ja<br /> |Show participants=Nee<br /> |Show sources=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=PR_00144&diff=49085 PR 00144 2017-11-05T15:40:47Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>== Keywords to describe our research: ==<br /> * Cross-disciplinary approach to study social innovation<br /> <br /> == Abstracts ==<br /> Identify the purpose (motivation)<br /> * Why did you decide to do this study or project?<br /> * How did you conduct your research?<br /> * Why is this research and your findings important?<br /> * Why should someone read your entire essay?<br /> * This section should include the importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the impact it might have if successful.<br /> Explain the problem at hand (problem statement)<br /> * What problem is your research trying to better understand or solve?<br /> * What is the scope of your study - a general problem, or something specific?<br /> * What is your main claim or argument?<br /> Describe the method (approach)<br /> <br /> Give your conclusion<br /> * What are the implications of your work?<br /> * Are your results general or very specific?<br /> <br /> Outline --> Introduction - Body - Conclusion. Two paragraphs up to one page of text. ~ 300 words. <br /> <br /> === Paper 1 - Theoretical paper ===<br /> * De huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistische / minimalistisch en transformative / radical opzoeken).<br /> ** Minimalist - Maximalist: "A third type of radical innovation has been elaborated by Mangabeira Unger. He distinguishes between '''minimalist social innovations''' which give a human face to an otherwise unsupportable situation, and '''maximalist social innovations''' that aim at deep changes. ”<br /> ** Transformative - Radical <br /> * GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> * Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken.<br /> * Combinatie met Human and Social Geography<br /> * '''PLACE'''<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Social innovation, as a means to an end and an end it itself, has increasingly gained the interest of academics, practisioners and policy makers alike. The discussion has largely focussed on the goals of social innovation as well as on finding common ground regarding the definition. Social innovation addresses local social needs and global societal challenges. It does so by using social means through the development of new, or the transformation of, social relations. These socially innovative actions are driven by different processes to enable groups to better satisfy their human needs and improve their living conditions. <br /> <br /> Instead of joining the greater discussion on the content, outcomes and definition of social innovation, this study focusses on the process dimension. More specifically, it aims at elucidating the processes of social learning, individual and collective awareness rising, and socio-political mobilisation. At a microlevel it explores the connections between the different actors partaking in socially innovative actions. <br /> <br /> In order to explore the process dimension of social innovation this study takes on a cross-disciplinary approach and draws on human and social geography literature. More specifically, this theoretical paper enhances the discussion on the process of social innovation by introducing the concepts of '''place and community (? en dan later de rol van narrative en encounter?)'''. <br /> <br /> This will extend the <br /> <br /> It aims at elucidating what happens during the process.<br /> <br /> .... a closer focus on the process <br /> <br /> ....This study.... takes a social geography lens by drawing on the concepts of place and community <br /> <br /> .... looks at micro connections between individuals.... <br /> <br /> .... a cross-disciplinary approach between policy administration and human & social geography <br /> <br /> "Social innovation derives from bringing together different actors that normally do not maintain relationships or only in direct conflict. Reorganise the connections between different actors - mutual learning (narratives?)" (Klein 2010). --> '''Link this with "The encounter", link to human/social geography''' <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for....... researchers, practisioners and policy makers interested in the greater picture of social innovation <br /> <br /> === Paper 2 - The process of social innovation ===<br /> * lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen?<br /> * relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn?<br /> * inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur!<br /> * etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen (public administration). Etnografie en innovatie.<br /> * '''THE ENCOUNTER + NARRATIVE'''<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> While previous studies often focussed on the organisational level, this study explores the social innovation process on the micro level of the individual. Instead of looking at leadership and the capabilities and competences of human change agents, this study focusses on the relations between the individual people taking part in the social innovation process. <br /> <br /> Moulaert: "''Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organisational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behaviour."'' <br /> <br /> In vergelijk met Zapf (2003, p.427) ''"...process of change in the social structure of a society in its constitutive institutions, cultural patterns, associated social actions and conscious awareness"'' <br /> <br /> .... Concepts? The encounter &...? <br /> <br /> overdenkingen plaats: <br /> <br /> Greep natiestaten verzwakt en decentralisaties -> plaats belangrijker. Relationeel. Verknoping van relaties. Groepen delen weinig behalve de plaats waar ze samenkomen. Gedeelde verantwoordelijkheid. Plaats -> nieuwe gemeenschappelijkheid. Laagdrempelig. Vanuit nabijheid. Afhankelijkheid (krimp?) -> lotsverbondenheid. Samen verantwoordelijkheid nemen voor een plaats veronderstelt een positie van gelijkwaardigheid. <br /> <br /> Overheid: gelijke kansen. Democratische plicht om om te investeren in een publiek ontmoetingsstructuur. Ook: Potentieel van plaatgebaseerde vormen van care. Burgerschap als prijktijk. Wat mensen concreet doen. Toegenomen belang van plaats in het organiseren van ons samenleven.<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for researchers and practisioners in the public administration discipline. <br /> <br /> === Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself? ===<br /> <br /> * link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat:<br /> * zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie?<br /> * '''CARE + COMMUNITY'''<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Role of ethics in micro practices<br /> <br /> Concept of ‘care’ sometimes used as an alternative to the concept of solidarity<br /> <br /> Specific focus on ethics: how do people take care of each other; ethics of care<br /> <br /> Ethics of care: looks at ethics which pays more attention to emotional and private role of ethical judgments.<br /> <br /> Look at the actual practices in everyday life settings and grass-roots movements<br /> <br /> Care for each other plays everywhere; we look at how it works in neighbourhoods and in the family. <br /> <br /> Focus on the individual experiences.<br /> <br /> Why: better understanding of how all those individual choices work through the way society changes.<br /> <br /> Again: role encounter and place: We need to think more carefully about which types of encounters are sought, and by whom, and which are avoided, and by whom.<br /> <br /> The emphasis is placed not just on immediate contact experiences, but also on how peoples accrued histories of social experience and material circumstances may also contribute to their feelings about different sorts of encounters. In particular, how do 'real' and 'imagined' feelings and practices of care inhibit or open up the possibilities that a bridge being made between people's attitudes to particular individuals and to wider social groups?<br /> <br /> aim: to recognize cares and different responsibilities formed in material, technological, symbolic and imagined space. ....can be extended as a form of interest in the... (commons?<br /> <br /> (To scan the landscape for evidence and proposals for new ways of gathering diversity into a functioning ‘commons’. <br /> <br /> Commons: seen as:) <br /> <br /> Argument link with social innovation: the role of ethics in community building: <br /> <br /> Not a focus on the innovative individual but: <br /> <br /> are the different ways to care for each other that arise in the community a social innovation in itself? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 4 - Politics of care ===<br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon.<br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers.<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with socifik governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. (focus: decision makers’ and civil servants’ ) capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> In this paper we look at political responsability and political practice. What might a politics of care be? How might local politics participate in that ethics of care and building new communities and collaboration? Is this paper we will examine the affective dimension of political subjects and opportunities.<br /> <br /> Practical ethics<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with specific governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. decision makers’ and civil servants’ capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> definition: Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organizational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behavior. <br /> <br /> Instead of focussing at the code or the principles, the norms and the values, we focus at the cultivation of the ethical person, the self-formation as an ethical subject involving practices of forming the ethical political subject.<br /> <br /> Which attitudes and practices could make possible ethically sensitive, negotiated settlements between different groups and individuals in the collaboration process and the construction of communities?<br /> <br /> Focus on the attitude of a divers set of policy makers. Not in an administrative sense.<br /> <br /> Antropologie of policy makers: a more informal and affective perspective:<br /> <br /> explore some of the ways and means in which antropologie might begin to show more attitude and greater determination in mobilizing action and leading change in an organizational setting<br /> <br /> the importance of narrative in interpreting human meaning and experience + understanding performance and action itself<br /> <br /> missing part: all about the research significance of narrative, narrative analyses, not its practical significance. The role that narrative and stories might play in mobilizing action + bringing about change (mobilizing narrative)<br /> <br /> Social innovation: instead of looking at shared norms and values we ….a closer look into the process. Not follow a pre given set of norms and values but looking at the process of altering the meaning of what is is to be social.<br /> <br /> will enable us to identify more precisely the problems associated with…..as the are constructed in the proces of social innovation. We focus on the process dimension of SI as this dimension is most relevant to the governance challenges….<br /> <br /> SI is not only innovation that is directed at social goals but also uses social means. Social means refer to the development of new or transformation of social relations. <br /> <br /> Look at the interaction among divers conscious actors on a small scale. <br /> <br /> Grassroots movements places where they excercise their responsibility. A close look into micropolitical opportunities. <br /> <br /> Local forms of social innovation tend to highlight the need for necognition and reprensentation and could hence help to improve conventional welfare state politics. <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 5 - What happens when you become the best practise ===<br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd<br /> * de rol van plaats<br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie<br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Unit of analysis: localized social innovations (against the restructuring of the well-fare state) <br /> <br /> and include its spatial form and institutional embedding<br /> <br /> best pracice: Ulrum (+ dZH?)<br /> <br /> we approach localized forms of SI against the backdrop of the restructering of the wellfare state + new social challenges (participation and joint decision making?)<br /> <br /> focus: governance challenges + dilemma’s <br /> <br /> proces: risks<br /> <br /> best practice -> exposure -> effects?<br /> <br /> Internal relations (+ encounter with the stranger)<br /> <br /> Leaving space to citizens’ and communities’ self-organisation -> risks for:<br /> <br /> the local organisation (focus local promoters): what happens with internal relations, living up to expectations, pressure (subsidies), timeframes and publicity <br /> <br /> public institutions (focus key persons in strategic public institutions): their biggest challenge is to create favourable conditions + risks (inequality, keeping control over exclusionary processes, avoiding risks of delegation and passive subsidiary).<br /> <br /> Influenced by political pressures which are again influenced by socio-economic and socio-demographic challenges like legitimacy and inclusiveness. Look into the posibilities and the boundaries of citizenship.<br /> <br /> Actors putting forward SI initiatives should learn to actively act (on different scales)<br /> <br /> the question is: how is it possible to create a good balance between public care and responsibility. <br /> <br /> Place making: look at the potential of place-based forms of solidarity and care. Recent thinking about citizenship. Look at what people actually do. Who is active in the public space? Increased importance of place in our society. Making place becomes an important project.<br /> <br /> functions as a microprocess that makes macropolitical settlement possible<br /> <br /> a better uderstanding of the balance among social, manegerial and political aims, devoting a special attention to responsability and accountability, both within the grass roots movement and public institutions as well as their partnerships with different kind of actors. (?)<br /> <br /> Closer look into practice of social innovation: to identify more precisely the specific problems associated; a closer look at the collaboration, interdependence, the awareness of it and the actual creation of active trust and reflexive engagement. <br /> <br /> Analyse how these tensions play out in actual practices as they are constructed in practice of social innovation.<br /> <br /> Also contextual conditions that facilitate or hinder si.<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 6 - Auto-Ethnography ===<br /> * Professional als object van solidariteit.<br /> * buffer zijn / risico absorberen<br /> * pedagogie als discipline?<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Another way of making personal experiences relevant for .... <br /> <br /> Auto-etnografie: <br /> <br /> Kracht auto-etnografie: inzicht verschaffen in de doorwerking van gebeurtenissen, maatregelen, wetgeving, normen en waarden en concrete levens maar ook inzicht in de totstandkoming van onderzoeksresultaten en conclusies.<br /> <br /> Analytische auto-etnografie als methode?<br /> <br /> encounter with 'the stranger'<br /> <br /> role of intermediary<br /> <br /> Role facilitator / intermediary in SI needs: managing and creating innovative and productive contexts to value each others stenghts and avoid each other weaknesses. <br /> <br /> Experiment with new theories, techniques, methods of research and, in this case: representation.<br /> <br /> Massey: "Unavoidably we had to think about the politics and ethics of out academic 'locality'. And here choice looms as a daily challenge: a choice of the theorist, not to try to 'get is right' but to persue inventiveness"<br /> <br /> Opvallend is de centrale ondersteunende rol van 'professionals' en 'publieke ontmoetingsstructuur'. De positie van professionals (in 4 politics hier anders bedoeld). Rol van reflectie en machtsverhoudingen (bestendigen of prioriteiten van buiten opleggen). Het is echter belangrijk om deze rol zichtbaar te maken (alleen al omdat het mythes over het spontane karakter van zorg voor elkaar en directe solidariteit onderuit haalt). De plaatsgebonden vormen van directe vormen van solidariteit (care) zijn via de financiering van professionals en ontmoetingsstructuur sterk verweven met de indirecte solidariteit (care) van de verzorgingsstaat. In Ulrum ook: Ook andere sporen van overheidssfinanciering: het gebruik maken van publiek gefinancierde onderzoeksinstellingen. Sterk verweven in de praktijk (indirect en direct). <br /> <br /> Zie ook Kok: "de overheid was nog nooit zo betrokken"<br /> <br /> The results of this research are relevant for.......{{Project config}}<br /> {{Project<br /> |Supercontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Project type=SSM, Standaard<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Name=Papers & Articles<br /> |Start date=2017/07/06<br /> |Summary=Written papers and articles<br /> |Show summary=Ja<br /> |Show navigation tree=Ja<br /> |Show sub projects=Ja<br /> |Show participants=Nee<br /> |Show sources=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=PR_00144&diff=49084 PR 00144 2017-11-05T15:39:36Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>== Keywords to describe our research: ==<br /> * Cross-disciplinary approach to study social innovation<br /> <br /> == Abstracts ==<br /> Identify the purpose (motivation)<br /> * Why did you decide to do this study or project?<br /> * How did you conduct your research?<br /> * Why is this research and your findings important?<br /> * Why should someone read your entire essay?<br /> * This section should include the importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the impact it might have if successful.<br /> Explain the problem at hand (problem statement)<br /> * What problem is your research trying to better understand or solve?<br /> * What is the scope of your study - a general problem, or something specific?<br /> * What is your main claim or argument?<br /> Describe the method (approach)<br /> <br /> Give your conclusion<br /> * What are the implications of your work?<br /> * Are your results general or very specific?<br /> <br /> Outline --> Introduction - Body - Conclusion. Two paragraphs up to one page of text. ~ 300 words. <br /> <br /> === Paper 1 - Theoretical paper ===<br /> * De huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistische / minimalistisch en transformative / radical opzoeken).<br /> ** Minimalist - Maximalist: "A third type of radical innovation has been elaborated by Mangabeira Unger. He distinguishes between '''minimalist social innovations''' which give a human face to an otherwise unsupportable situation, and '''maximalist social innovations''' that aim at deep changes. ”<br /> ** Transformative - Radical <br /> * GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> * Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken.<br /> * Combinatie met Human and Social Geography<br /> * '''PLACE'''<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Social innovation, as a means to an end and an end it itself, has increasingly gained the interest of academics, practisioners and policy makers alike. The discussion has largely focussed on the goals of social innovation as well as on finding common ground regarding the definition. Social innovation addresses local social needs and global societal challenges. It does so by using social means through the development of new, or the transformation of, social relations. These socially innovative actions are driven by different processes to enable groups to better satisfy their human needs and improve their living conditions. <br /> <br /> Instead of joining the greater discussion on the content, outcomes and definition of social innovation, this study focusses on the process dimension. More specifically, it aims at elucidating the processes of social learning, individual and collective awareness rising, and socio-political mobilisation. At a microlevel it explores the connections between the different actors partaking in socially innovative actions. <br /> <br /> In order to explore the process dimension of social innovation this study takes on a cross-disciplinary approach and draws on human and social geography literature. More specifically, this theoretical paper enhances the discussion on the process of social innovation by introducing the concepts of '''place and community (? en dan later de rol van narrative en encounter?)'''. <br /> <br /> This will extend the <br /> <br /> It aims at elucidating what happens during the process.<br /> <br /> .... a closer focus on the process <br /> <br /> ....This study.... takes a social geography lens by drawing on the concepts of place and community <br /> <br /> .... looks at micro connections between individuals.... <br /> <br /> .... a cross-disciplinary approach between policy administration and human & social geography <br /> <br /> "Social innovation derives from bringing together different actors that normally do not maintain relationships or only in direct conflict. Reorganise the connections between different actors - mutual learning (narratives?)" (Klein 2010). --> '''Link this with "The encounter", link to human/social geography''' <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for....... researchers, practisioners and policy makers interested in the greater picture of social innovation <br /> <br /> === Paper 2 - The process of social innovation ===<br /> * lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen?<br /> * relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn?<br /> * inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur!<br /> * etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen (public administration). Etnografie en innovatie.<br /> * '''THE ENCOUNTER + NARRATIVE'''<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> While previous studies often focussed on the organisational level, this study explores the social innovation process on the micro level of the individual. Instead of looking at leadership and the capabilities and competences of human change agents, this study focusses on the relations between the individual people taking part in the social innovation process. <br /> <br /> Moulaert: "''Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organisational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behaviour."'' <br /> <br /> In vergelijk met Zapf (2003, p.427) ''"...process of change in the social structure of a society in its constitutive institutions, cultural patterns, associated social actions and conscious awareness"'' <br /> <br /> .... Concepts? The encounter &...? <br /> <br /> overdenkingen plaats: <br /> <br /> Greep natiestaten verzwakt en decentralisaties -> plaats belangrijker. Relationeel. Verknoping van relaties. Groepen delen weinig behalve de plaats waar ze samenkomen. Gedeelde verantwoordelijkheid. Plaats -> nieuwe gemeenschappelijkheid. Laagdrempelig. Vanuit nabijheid. Afhankelijkheid (krimp?) -> lotsverbondenheid. Samen verantwoordelijkheid nemen voor een plaats veronderstelt een positie van gelijkwaardigheid. <br /> <br /> Overheid: gelijke kansen. Democratische plicht om om te investeren in een publiek ontmoetingsstructuur. Ook: Potentieel van plaatgebaseerde vormen van care. Burgerschap als prijktijk. Wat mensen concreet doen. Toegenomen belang van plaats in het organiseren van ons samenleven.<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for researchers and practisioners in the public administration discipline. <br /> <br /> === Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself? ===<br /> <br /> * link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat:<br /> * zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie?<br /> * '''CARE + COMMUNITY'''<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Role of ethics in micro practices<br /> <br /> Concept of ‘care’ sometimes used as an alternative to the concept of solidarity<br /> <br /> Specific focus on ethics: how do people take care of each other; ethics of care<br /> <br /> Ethics of care: looks at ethics which pays more attention to emotional and private role of ethical judgments.<br /> <br /> Look at the actual practices in everyday life settings and grass-roots movements<br /> <br /> Care for each other plays everywhere; we look at how it works in neighbourhoods and in the family. <br /> <br /> Focus on the individual experiences.<br /> <br /> Why: better understanding of how all those individual choices work through the way society changes.<br /> <br /> Again: role encounter and place: We need to think more carefully about which types of encounters are sought, and by whom, and which are avoided, and by whom.<br /> <br /> The emphasis is placed not just on immediate contact experiences, but also on how peoples accrued histories of social experience and material circumstances may also contribute to their feelings about different sorts of encounters. In particular, how do 'real' and 'imagined' feelings and practices of care inhibit or open up the possibilities that a bridge being made between people's attitudes to particular individuals and to wider social groups?<br /> <br /> aim: to recognize cares and different responsibilities formed in material, technological, symbolic and imagined space. ....can be extended as a form of interest in the... (commons?<br /> <br /> (To scan the landscape for evidence and proposals for new ways of gathering diversity into a functioning ‘commons’. <br /> <br /> Commons: seen as:) <br /> <br /> Argument link with social innovation: the role of ethics in community building: <br /> <br /> Not a focus on the innovative individual but: <br /> <br /> are the different ways to care for each other that arise in the community a social innovation in itself? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 4 - Politics of care ===<br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon.<br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers.<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with socifik governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. (focus: decision makers’ and civil servants’ ) capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> In this paper we look at political responsability and political practice. What might a politics of care be? How might local politics participate in that ethics of care and building new communities and collaboration? Is this paper we will examine the affective dimension of political subjects and opportunities.<br /> <br /> Practical ethics<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with specific governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. decision makers’ and civil servants’ capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> definition: Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organizational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behavior. <br /> <br /> Instead of focussing at the code or the principles, the norms and the values, we focus at the cultivation of the ethical person, the self-formation as an ethical subject involving practices of forming the ethical political subject.<br /> <br /> Which attitudes and practices could make possible ethically sensitive, negotiated settlements between different groups and individuals in the collaboration process and the construction of communities?<br /> <br /> Focus on the attitude of a divers set of policy makers. Not in an administrative sense.<br /> <br /> Antropologie of policy makers: a more informal and affective perspective:<br /> <br /> explore some of the ways and means in which antropologie might begin to show more attitude and greater determination in mobilizing action and leading change in an organizational setting<br /> <br /> the importance of narrative in interpreting human meaning and experience + understanding performance and action itself<br /> <br /> missing part: all about the research significance of narrative, narrative analyses, not its practical significance. The role that narrative and stories might play in mobilizing action + bringing about change (mobilizing narrative)<br /> <br /> Social innovation: instead of looking at shared norms and values we ….a closer look into the process. Not follow a pre given set of norms and values but looking at the process of altering the meaning of what is is to be social.<br /> <br /> will enable us to identify more precisely the problems associated with…..as the are constructed in the proces of social innovation. We focus on the process dimension of SI as this dimension is most relevant to the governance challenges….<br /> <br /> SI is not only innovation that is directed at social goals but also uses social means. Social means refer to the development of new or transformation of social relations. <br /> <br /> Look at the interaction among divers conscious actors on a small scale. <br /> <br /> Grassroots movements places where they excercise their responsibility. A close look into micropolitical opportunities. <br /> <br /> Local forms of social innovation tend to highlight the need for necognition and reprensentation and could hence help to improve conventional welfare state politics. <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 5 - What happens when you become the best practise ===<br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd<br /> * de rol van plaats<br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie<br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Unit of analysis: localized social innovations (against the restructuring of the well-fare state) <br /> <br /> and include its spatial form and institutional embedding<br /> <br /> best pracice: Ulrum (+ dZH?)<br /> <br /> we approach localized forms of SI against the backdrop of the restructering of the wellfare state + new social challenges (participation and joint decision making?)<br /> <br /> focus: governance challenges + dilemma’s <br /> <br /> proces: risks<br /> <br /> best practice -> exposure -> effects?<br /> <br /> Internal relations (+ encounter with the stranger)<br /> <br /> Leaving space to citizens’ and communities’ self-organisation -> risks for:<br /> <br /> the local organisation (focus local promoters): what happens with internal relations, living up to expectations, pressure (subsidies), timeframes and publicity <br /> <br /> public institutions (focus key persons in strategic public institutions): their biggest challenge is to create favourable conditions + risks (inequality, keeping control over exclusionary processes, avoiding risks of delegation and passive subsidiary).<br /> <br /> Influenced by political pressures which are again influenced by socio-economic and socio-demographic challenges like legitimacy and inclusiveness. Look into the posibilities and the boundaries of citizenship.<br /> <br /> Actors putting forward SI initiatives should learn to actively act (on different scales)<br /> <br /> the question is: how is it possible to create a good balance between public care and responsibility. <br /> <br /> Place making: look at the potential of place-based forms of solidarity and care. Recent thinking about citizenship. Look at what people actually do. Who is active in the public space? Increased importance of place in our society. Making place becomes an important project.<br /> <br /> functions as a microprocess that makes macropolitical settlement possible<br /> <br /> a better uderstanding of the balance among social, manegerial and political aims, devoting a special attention to responsability and accountability, both within the grass roots movement and public institutions as well as their partnerships with different kind of actors. (?)<br /> <br /> Closer look into practice of social innovation: to identify more precisely the specific problems associated; a closer look at the collaboration, interdependence, the awareness of it and the actual creation of active trust and reflexive engagement. <br /> <br /> Analyse how these tensions play out in actual practices as they are constructed in practice of social innovation.<br /> <br /> Also contextual conditions that facilitate or hinder si.<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 6 - Auto-Ethnography ===<br /> * Professional als object van solidariteit.<br /> * buffer zijn / risico absorberen<br /> * pedagogie als discipline?<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Another way of making personal experiences relevant for .... <br /> <br /> Auto-etnografie: <br /> <br /> Kracht auto-etnografie: inzicht verschaffen in de doorwerking van gebeurtenissen, maatregelen, wetgeving, normen en waarden en concrete levens maar ook inzicht in de totstandkoming van onderzoeksresultaten en conclusies.<br /> <br /> encounter with 'the stranger' <br /> <br /> role of intermediary<br /> <br /> Role facilitator / intermediary in SI needs: managing and creating innovative and productive contexts to value each others stenghts and avoid each other weaknesses. <br /> <br /> Experiment with new theories, techniques, methods of research and, in this case: representation.<br /> <br /> Massey: "Unavoidably we had to think about the politics and ethics of out academic 'locality'. And here choice looms as a daily challenge: a choice of the theorist, not to try to 'get is right' but to persue inventiveness"<br /> <br /> Opvallend is de centrale ondersteunende rol van 'professionals' en 'publieke ontmoetingsstructuur'. De positie van professionals (in 4 politics hier anders bedoeld). Rol van reflectie en machtsverhoudingen (bestendigen of prioriteiten van buiten opleggen). Het is echter belangrijk om deze rol zichtbaar te maken (alleen al omdat het mythes over het spontane karakter van zorg voor elkaar en directe solidariteit onderuit haalt). De plaatsgebonden vormen van directe vormen van solidariteit (care) zijn via de financiering van professionals en ontmoetingsstructuur sterk verweven met de indirecte solidariteit (care) van de verzorgingsstaat. In Ulrum ook: Ook andere sporen van overheidssfinanciering: het gebruik maken van publiek gefinancierde onderzoeksinstellingen. Sterk verweven in de praktijk (indirect en direct). <br /> <br /> Zie ook Kok: "de overheid was nog nooit zo betrokken"<br /> <br /> The results of this research are relevant for.......{{Project config}}<br /> {{Project<br /> |Supercontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Project type=SSM, Standaard<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Name=Papers & Articles<br /> |Start date=2017/07/06<br /> |Summary=Written papers and articles<br /> |Show summary=Ja<br /> |Show navigation tree=Ja<br /> |Show sub projects=Ja<br /> |Show participants=Nee<br /> |Show sources=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=PR_00144&diff=49072 PR 00144 2017-11-01T18:14:43Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>== Keywords to describe our research: ==<br /> * Cross-disciplinary approach to study social innovation<br /> <br /> == Abstracts ==<br /> Identify the purpose (motivation)<br /> * Why did you decide to do this study or project?<br /> * How did you conduct your research?<br /> * Why is this research and your findings important?<br /> * Why should someone read your entire essay?<br /> * This section should include the importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the impact it might have if successful.<br /> Explain the problem at hand (problem statement)<br /> * What problem is your research trying to better understand or solve?<br /> * What is the scope of your study - a general problem, or something specific?<br /> * What is your main claim or argument?<br /> Describe the method (approach)<br /> <br /> Give your conclusion<br /> * What are the implications of your work?<br /> * Are your results general or very specific?<br /> <br /> Outline --> Introduction - Body - Conclusion. Two paragraphs up to one page of text. ~ 300 words. <br /> <br /> === Paper 1 - Theoretical paper ===<br /> * De huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistische / minimalistisch en transformative / radical opzoeken).<br /> ** Minimalist - Maximalist: "A third type of radical innovation has been elaborated by Mangabeira Unger. He distinguishes between '''minimalist social innovations''' which give a human face to an otherwise unsupportable situation, and '''maximalist social innovations''' that aim at deep changes. ”<br /> ** Transformative - Radical <br /> * GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> * Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken.<br /> * Combinatie met Human and Social Geography<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Instead of joining the greater discussion on the uses of social innovation and its definition, this study focusses on the process. It aims at elucidating what happens during the process. <br /> <br /> .... a closer focus on the process <br /> <br /> ....This study.... takes a social geography lens by drawing on the concepts of place and community <br /> <br /> .... looks at micro connections between individuals.... <br /> <br /> .... a cross-disciplinary approach between policy administration and human & social geography <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for....... researchers, practisioners and policy makers interested in the greater picture of social innovation <br /> <br /> === Paper 2 - The process of social innovation ===<br /> * lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen?<br /> * relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn?<br /> * inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur!<br /> * etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen (public administration). Etnografie en innovatie.<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> While previous studies often focussed on the organisational level, this study explores the social innovation process on the micro level of the individual. Instead of looking at leadership and the capabilities and competences of human change agents, this study focusses on the relations between the individual people taking part in the social innovation process. <br /> <br /> Moulaert: Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organisational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behaviour. <br /> <br /> .... Concepts? The encounter &...? <br /> <br /> overdenkingen plaats: <br /> <br /> Greep natiestaten verzwakt en decentralisaties -> plaats belangrijker. Relationeel. Verknoping van relaties. Groepen delen weinig behalve de plaats waar ze samenkomen. Gedeelde verantwoordelijkheid. Plaats -> nieuwe gemeenschappelijkheid. Laagdrempelig. Vanuit nabijheid. Afhankelijkheid (krimp?) -> lotsverbondenheid. Samen verantwoordelijkheid nemen voor een plaats veronderstelt een positie van gelijkwaardigheid. <br /> <br /> Overheid: gelijke kansen. Democratische plicht om om te investeren in een publiek ontmoetingsstructuur. Ook: Potentieel van plaatgebaseerde vormen van care. Burgerschap als prijktijk. Wat mensen concreet doen. Toegenomen belang van plaats in het organiseren van ons samenleven.<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for researchers and practisioners in the public administration discipline. <br /> <br /> === Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself? ===<br /> <br /> * link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat:<br /> * zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie?<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Role of ethics in micro practices<br /> <br /> Concept of ‘care’ sometimes used as an alternative to the concept of solidarity<br /> <br /> Specific focus on ethics: how do people take care of each other; ethics of care<br /> <br /> Ethics of care: looks at ethics which pays more attention to emotional and private role of ethical judgments.<br /> <br /> Look at the actual practices in everyday life settings and grass-roots movements<br /> <br /> Care for each other plays everywhere; we look at how it works in neighbourhoods and in the family. <br /> <br /> Focus on the individual experiences.<br /> <br /> Why: better understanding of how all those individual choices work through the way society changes.<br /> <br /> Again: role encounter and place: We need to think more carefully about which types of encounters are sought, and by whom, and which are avoided, and by whom.<br /> <br /> The emphasis is placed not just on immediate contact experiences, but also on how peoples accrued histories of social experience and material circumstances may also contribute to their feelings about different sorts of encounters. In particular, how do 'real' and 'imagined' feelings and practices of care inhibit or open up the possibilities that a bridge being made between people's attitudes to particular individuals and to wider social groups?<br /> <br /> aim: to recognize cares and different responsibilities formed in material, technological, symbolic and imagined space. ....can be extended as a form of interest in the... (commons?<br /> <br /> (To scan the landscape for evidence and proposals for new ways of gathering diversity into a functioning ‘commons’. <br /> <br /> Commons: seen as:) <br /> <br /> Argument link with social innovation: the role of ethics in community building: <br /> <br /> Not a focus on the innovative individual but: <br /> <br /> are the different ways to care for each other that arise in the community a social innovation in itself? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 4 - Politics of care ===<br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon.<br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers.<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with socifik governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. (focus: decision makers’ and civil servants’ ) capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> In this paper we look at political responsability and political practice. What might a politics of care be? How might local politics participate in that ethics of care and building new communities and collaboration? Is this paper we will examine the affective dimension of political subjects and opportunities.<br /> <br /> Practical ethics<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with specific governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. decision makers’ and civil servants’ capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> definition: Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organizational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behavior. <br /> <br /> Instead of focussing at the code or the principles, the norms and the values, we focus at the cultivation of the ethical person, the self-formation as an ethical subject involving practices of forming the ethical political subject.<br /> <br /> Which attitudes and practices could make possible ethically sensitive, negotiated settlements between different groups and individuals in the collaboration process and the construction of communities?<br /> <br /> Focus on the attitude of a divers set of policy makers. Not in an administrative sense.<br /> <br /> Antropologie of policy makers: a more informal and affective perspective:<br /> <br /> explore some of the ways and means in which antropologie might begin to show more attitude and greater determination in mobilizing action and leading change in an organizational setting<br /> <br /> the importance of narrative in interpreting human meaning and experience + understanding performance and action itself<br /> <br /> missing part: all about the research significance of narrative, narrative analyses, not its practical significance. The role that narrative and stories might play in mobilizing action + bringing about change (mobilizing narrative)<br /> <br /> Social innovation: instead of looking at shared norms and values we ….a closer look into the process. Not follow a pre given set of norms and values but looking at the process of altering the meaning of what is is to be social.<br /> <br /> will enable us to identify more precisely the problems associated with…..as the are constructed in the proces of social innovation. We focus on the process dimension of SI as this dimension is most relevant to the governance challenges….<br /> <br /> SI is not only innovation that is directed at social goals but also uses social means. Social means refer to the development of new or transformation of social relations. <br /> <br /> Look at the interaction among divers conscious actors on a small scale. <br /> <br /> Grassroots movements places where they excercise their responsibility. A close look into micropolitical opportunities. <br /> <br /> Local forms of social innovation tend to highlight the need for necognition and reprensentation and could hence help to improve conventional welfare state politics. <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 5 - What happens when you become the best practise ===<br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd<br /> * de rol van plaats<br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie<br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Unit of analysis: localized social innovations (against the restructuring of the well-fare state) <br /> <br /> and include its spatial form and institutional embedding<br /> <br /> best pracice: Ulrum (+ dZH?)<br /> <br /> we approach localized forms of SI against the backdrop of the restructering of the wellfare state + new social challenges (participation and joint decision making?)<br /> <br /> focus: governance challenges + dilemma’s <br /> <br /> proces: risks<br /> <br /> best practice -> exposure -> effects?<br /> <br /> Internal relations (+ encounter with the stranger)<br /> <br /> Leaving space to citizens’ and communities’ self-organisation -> risks for:<br /> <br /> the local organisation (focus local promoters): what happens with internal relations, living up to expectations, pressure (subsidies), timeframes and publicity <br /> <br /> public institutions (focus key persons in strategic public institutions): their biggest challenge is to create favourable conditions + risks (inequality, keeping control over exclusionary processes, avoiding risks of delegation and passive subsidiary).<br /> <br /> Influenced by political pressures which are again influenced by socio-economic and socio-demographic challenges like legitimacy and inclusiveness. Look into the posibilities and the boundaries of citizenship.<br /> <br /> Actors putting forward SI initiatives should learn to actively act (on different scales)<br /> <br /> the question is: how is it possible to create a good balance between public care and responsibility. <br /> <br /> Place making: look at the potential of place-based forms of solidarity and care. Recent thinking about citizenship. Look at what people actually do. Who is active in the public space? Increased importance of place in our society. Making place becomes an important project.<br /> <br /> functions as a microprocess that makes macropolitical settlement possible<br /> <br /> a better uderstanding of the balance among social, manegerial and political aims, devoting a special attention to responsability and accountability, both within the grass roots movement and public institutions as well as their partnerships with different kind of actors. (?)<br /> <br /> Closer look into practice of social innovation: to identify more precisely the specific problems associated; a closer look at the collaboration, interdependence, the awareness of it and the actual creation of active trust and reflexive engagement. <br /> <br /> Analyse how these tensions play out in actual practices as they are constructed in practice of social innovation.<br /> <br /> Also contextual conditions that facilitate or hinder si.<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 6 - Auto-Ethnography ===<br /> * Professional als object van solidariteit.<br /> * buffer zijn / risico absorberen<br /> * pedagogie als discipline?<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......{{Project config}}<br /> {{Project<br /> |Supercontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Project type=SSM, Standaard<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Name=Papers & Articles<br /> |Start date=2017/07/06<br /> |Summary=Written papers and articles<br /> |Show summary=Ja<br /> |Show navigation tree=Ja<br /> |Show sub projects=Ja<br /> |Show participants=Nee<br /> |Show sources=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=PR_00144&diff=49071 PR 00144 2017-11-01T16:16:57Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>== Keywords to describe our research: ==<br /> * Cross-disciplinary approach to study social innovation<br /> <br /> == Abstracts ==<br /> Identify the purpose (motivation)<br /> * Why did you decide to do this study or project?<br /> * How did you conduct your research?<br /> * Why is this research and your findings important?<br /> * Why should someone read your entire essay?<br /> * This section should include the importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the impact it might have if successful.<br /> Explain the problem at hand (problem statement)<br /> * What problem is your research trying to better understand or solve?<br /> * What is the scope of your study - a general problem, or something specific?<br /> * What is your main claim or argument?<br /> Describe the method (approach)<br /> <br /> Give your conclusion<br /> * What are the implications of your work?<br /> * Are your results general or very specific?<br /> <br /> Outline --> Introduction - Body - Conclusion. Two paragraphs up to one page of text. ~ 300 words. <br /> <br /> === Paper 1 - Theoretical paper ===<br /> * De huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistische / minimalistisch en transformative / radical opzoeken).<br /> ** Minimalist - Maximalist: "A third type of radical innovation has been elaborated by Mangabeira Unger. He distinguishes between '''minimalist social innovations''' which give a human face to an otherwise unsupportable situation, and '''maximalist social innovations''' that aim at deep changes. ”<br /> ** Transformative - Radical <br /> * GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> * Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken.<br /> * Combinatie met Human and Social Geography<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Instead of joining the greater discussion on the uses of social innovation and its definition, this study focusses on the process. It aims at elucidating what happens during the process. <br /> <br /> .... a closer focus on the process <br /> <br /> ....This study.... takes a social geography lens by drawing on the concepts of place and community <br /> <br /> .... looks at micro connections between individuals.... <br /> <br /> .... a cross-disciplinary approach between policy administration and human & social geography <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for....... researchers, practisioners and policy makers interested in the greater picture of social innovation <br /> <br /> === Paper 2 - The process of social innovation ===<br /> * lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen?<br /> * relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn?<br /> * inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur!<br /> * etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen (public administration). Etnografie en innovatie.<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> While previous studies often focussed on the organisational level, this study explores the social innovation process on the micro level of the individual. Instead of looking at leadership and the capabilities and competences of human change agents, this study focusses on the relations between the individual people taking part in the social innovation process. <br /> <br /> Moulaert: Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organisational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behaviour. <br /> <br /> .... Concepts? The encounter &...? <br /> <br /> overdenkingen plaats: <br /> <br /> Greep natiestaten verzwakt en decentralisaties -> plaats belangrijker. Relationeel. Verknoping van relaties. Groepen delen weinig behalve de plaats waar ze samenkomen. Gedeelde verantwoordelijkheid. Plaats -> nieuwe gemeenschappelijkheid. Laagdrempelig. Vanuit nabijheid. Afhankelijkheid (krimp?) -> lotsverbondenheid. Samen verantwoordelijkheid nemen voor een plaats veronderstelt een positie van gelijkwaardigheid. <br /> <br /> Overheid: gelijke kansen. Democratische plicht om om te investeren in een publiek ontmoetingsstructuur. Ook: Potentieel van plaatgebaseerde vormen van care. Burgerschap als prijktijk. Wat mensen concreet doen. Toegenomen belang van plaats in het organiseren van ons samenleven.<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for researchers and practisioners in the public administration discipline. <br /> <br /> === Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself? ===<br /> <br /> * link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat:<br /> * zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie?<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Role of ethics in micro practices<br /> <br /> Concept of ‘care’ sometimes used as an alternative to the concept of solidarity<br /> <br /> Specific focus on ethics: how do people take care of each other; ethics of care<br /> <br /> Ethics of care: looks at ethics which pays more attention to emotional and private role of ethical judgments.<br /> <br /> Look at the actual practices in everyday life settings and grass-roots movements<br /> <br /> Care for each other plays everywhere; we look at how it works in neighbourhoods and in the family. <br /> <br /> Focus on the individual experiences.<br /> <br /> Why: better understanding of how all those individual choices work through the way society changes.<br /> <br /> Again: role encounter and place: We need to think more carefully about which types of encounters are sought, and by whom, and which are avoided, and by whom.<br /> <br /> The emphasis is placed not just on immediate contact experiences, but also on how peoples accrued histories of social experience and material circumstances may also contribute to their feelings about different sorts of encounters. In particular, how do 'real' and 'imagined' feelings and practices of care inhibit or open up the possibilities that a bridge being made between people's attitudes to particular individuals and to wider social groups?<br /> <br /> aim: to recognize cares and different responsibilities formed in material, technological, symbolic and imagined space. ....can be extended as a form of interest in the... (commons?<br /> <br /> (To scan the landscape for evidence and proposals for new ways of gathering diversity into a functioning ‘commons’. <br /> <br /> Commons: seen as:) <br /> <br /> Argument link with social innovation: the role of ethics in community building: <br /> <br /> Not a focus on the innovative individual but: <br /> <br /> are the different ways to care for each other that arise in the community a social innovation in itself? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 4 - Politics of care ===<br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon.<br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers.<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with socifik governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. (focus: decision makers’ and civil servants’ ) capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> In this paper we look at political responsability and political practice. What might a politics of care be? How might local politics participate in that ethics of care and building new communities and collaboration? Is this paper we will examine the affective dimension of political subjects and opportunities.<br /> <br /> Practical ethics<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with specific governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. decision makers’ and civil servants’ capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> definition: Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organizational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behavior. <br /> <br /> Instead of focussing at the code or the principles, the norms and the values, we focus at the cultivation of the ethical person, the self-formation as an ethical subject involving practices of forming the ethical political subject.<br /> <br /> Which attitudes and practices could make possible ethically sensitive, negotiated settlements between different groups and individuals in the collaboration process and the construction of communities?<br /> <br /> Focus on the attitude of a divers set of policy makers. Not in an administrative sense.<br /> <br /> A more informal and affective perspective; a look into the antropology of policy makers<br /> <br /> Social innovation: instead of looking at shared norms and values we ….a closer look into the process. Not follow a pre given set of norms and values but looking at the process of altering the meaning of what is is to be social.<br /> <br /> will enable us to identify more precisely the problems associated with…..as the are constructed in the proces of social innovation. We focus on the process dimension of SI as this dimension is most relevant to the governance challenges….<br /> <br /> SI is not only innovation that is directed at social goals but also uses social means. Social means refer to the development of new or transformation of social relations. <br /> <br /> Look at the interaction among divers conscious actors on a small scale. <br /> <br /> Grassroots movements places where they excercise their responsibility. A close look into micropolitical opportunities. <br /> <br /> Local forms of social innovation tend to highlight the need for necognition and reprensentation and could hence help to improve conventional welfare state politics. <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 5 - What happens when you become the best practise ===<br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd<br /> * de rol van plaats<br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie<br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Unit of analysis: localized social innovations (against the restructuring of the well-fare state) <br /> <br /> and include its spatial form and institutional embedding<br /> <br /> best pracice: Ulrum (+ dZH?)<br /> <br /> we approach localized forms of SI against the backdrop of the restructering of the wellfare state + new social challenges (participation and joint decision making?)<br /> <br /> focus: governance challenges + dilemma’s <br /> <br /> proces: risks<br /> <br /> best practice -> exposure -> effects?<br /> <br /> Internal relations (+ encounter with the stranger)<br /> <br /> Leaving space to citizens’ and communities’ self-organisation -> risks for:<br /> <br /> the local organisation (focus local promoters): what happens with internal relations, living up to expectations, pressure (subsidies), timeframes and publicity <br /> <br /> public institutions (focus key persons in strategic public institutions): their biggest challenge is to create favourable conditions + risks (inequality, keeping control over exclusionary processes, avoiding risks of delegation and passive subsidiary).<br /> <br /> Influenced by political pressures which are again influenced by socio-economic and socio-demographic challenges like legitimacy and inclusiveness. Look into the posibilities and the boundaries of citizenship.<br /> <br /> Actors putting forward SI initiatives should learn to actively act (on different scales)<br /> <br /> the question is: how is it possible to create a good balance between public care and responsibility. <br /> <br /> Place making: look at the potential of place-based forms of solidarity and care. Recent thinking about citizenship. Look at what people actually do. Who is active in the public space? Increased importance of place in our society. Making place becomes an important project.<br /> <br /> functions as a microprocess that makes macropolitical settlement possible<br /> <br /> a better uderstanding of the balance among social, manegerial and political aims, devoting a special attention to responsability and accountability, both within the grass roots movement and public institutions as well as their partnerships with different kind of actors. (?)<br /> <br /> Closer look into practice of social innovation: to identify more precisely the specific problems associated; a closer look at the collaboration, interdependence, the awareness of it and the actual creation of active trust and reflexive engagement. <br /> <br /> Analyse how these tensions play out in actual practices as they are constructed in practice of social innovation.<br /> <br /> Also contextual conditions that facilitate or hinder si.<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 6 - Auto-Ethnography ===<br /> * Professional als object van solidariteit.<br /> * buffer zijn / risico absorberen<br /> * pedagogie als discipline?<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......{{Project config}}<br /> {{Project<br /> |Supercontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Project type=SSM, Standaard<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Name=Papers & Articles<br /> |Start date=2017/07/06<br /> |Summary=Written papers and articles<br /> |Show summary=Ja<br /> |Show navigation tree=Ja<br /> |Show sub projects=Ja<br /> |Show participants=Nee<br /> |Show sources=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=PR_00144&diff=49070 PR 00144 2017-11-01T16:15:23Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>== Keywords to describe our research: ==<br /> * Cross-disciplinary approach to study social innovation<br /> <br /> == Abstracts ==<br /> Identify the purpose (motivation)<br /> * Why did you decide to do this study or project?<br /> * How did you conduct your research?<br /> * Why is this research and your findings important?<br /> * Why should someone read your entire essay?<br /> * This section should include the importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the impact it might have if successful.<br /> Explain the problem at hand (problem statement)<br /> * What problem is your research trying to better understand or solve?<br /> * What is the scope of your study - a general problem, or something specific?<br /> * What is your main claim or argument?<br /> Describe the method (approach)<br /> <br /> Give your conclusion<br /> * What are the implications of your work?<br /> * Are your results general or very specific?<br /> <br /> Outline --> Introduction - Body - Conclusion. Two paragraphs up to one page of text. ~ 300 words. <br /> <br /> === Paper 1 - Theoretical paper ===<br /> * De huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistische / minimalistisch en transformative / radical opzoeken).<br /> ** Minimalist - Maximalist: "A third type of radical innovation has been elaborated by Mangabeira Unger. He distinguishes between '''minimalist social innovations''' which give a human face to an otherwise unsupportable situation, and '''maximalist social innovations''' that aim at deep changes. ”<br /> ** Transformative - Radical <br /> * GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> * Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken.<br /> * Combinatie met Human and Social Geography<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Instead of joining the greater discussion on the uses of social innovation and its definition, this study focusses on the process. It aims at elucidating what happens during the process. <br /> <br /> .... a closer focus on the process <br /> <br /> ....This study.... takes a social geography lens by drawing on the concepts of place and community <br /> <br /> .... looks at micro connections between individuals.... <br /> <br /> .... a cross-disciplinary approach between policy administration and human & social geography <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for....... researchers, practisioners and policy makers interested in the greater picture of social innovation <br /> <br /> === Paper 2 - The process of social innovation ===<br /> * lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen?<br /> * relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn?<br /> * inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur!<br /> * etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen (public administration). Etnografie en innovatie.<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> While previous studies often focussed on the organisational level, this study explores the social innovation process on the micro level of the individual. Instead of looking at leadership and the capabilities and competences of human change agents, this study focusses on the relations between the individual people taking part in the social innovation process. <br /> <br /> Moulaert: Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organisational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behaviour. <br /> <br /> .... Concepts? The encounter &...? <br /> <br /> overdenkingen plaats: <br /> <br /> Greep natiestaten verzwakt en decentralisaties -> plaats belangrijker. Relationeel. Verknoping van relaties. Groepen delen weinig behalve de plaats waar ze samenkomen. Gedeelde verantwoordelijkheid. Plaats -> nieuwe gemeenschappelijkheid. Laagdrempelig. Vanuit nabijheid. Afhankelijkheid (krimp?) -> lotsverbondenheid. Samen verantwoordelijkheid nemen voor een plaats veronderstelt een positie van gelijkwaardigheid. <br /> <br /> Overheid: gelijke kansen. Democratische plicht om om te investeren in een publiek ontmoetingsstructuur. Ook: Potentieel van plaatgebaseerde vormen van care. Burgerschap als prijktijk. Wat mensen concreet doen. Toegenomen belang van plaats in het organiseren van ons samenleven.<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for researchers and practisioners in the public administration discipline. <br /> <br /> === Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself? ===<br /> <br /> * link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat:<br /> * zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie?<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Role of ethics in micro practices<br /> <br /> Concept of ‘care’ sometimes used as an alternative to the concept of solidarity<br /> <br /> Specific focus on ethics: how do people take care of each other; ethics of care<br /> <br /> Ethics of care: looks at ethics which pays more attention to emotional and private role of ethical judgments.<br /> <br /> Look at the actual practices in everyday life settings and grass-roots movements<br /> <br /> Care for each other plays everywhere; we look at how it works in neighbourhoods and in the family. <br /> <br /> Focus on the individual experiences.<br /> <br /> Why: better understanding of how all those individual choices work through the way society changes.<br /> <br /> Again: role encounter and place: We need to think more carefully about which types of encounters are sought, and by whom, and which are avoided, and by whom.<br /> <br /> The emphasis is placed not just on immediate contact experiences, but also on how peoples accrued histories of social experience and material circumstances may also contribute to their feelings about different sorts of encounters. In particular, how do 'real' and 'imagined' feelings and practices of care inhibit or open up the possibilities that a bridge being made between people's attitudes to particular individuals and to wider social groups?<br /> <br /> aim: to recognize cares and different responsibilities formed in material, technological, symbolic and imagined space. ....can be extended as a form of interest in the commons.<br /> <br /> To scan the landscape for evidence and proposals for new ways of gathering diversity into a functioning ‘commons’. <br /> <br /> Commons: seen as: <br /> <br /> Argument link with social innovation: the role of ethics in community building: <br /> <br /> Not a focus on the innovative individual but: <br /> <br /> are the different ways to care for each other that arise in the community a social innovation in itself? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 4 - Politics of care ===<br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon.<br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers.<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with socifik governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. (focus: decision makers’ and civil servants’ ) capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> In this paper we look at political responsability and political practice. What might a politics of care be? How might local politics participate in that ethics of care and building new communities and collaboration? Is this paper we will examine the affective dimension of political subjects and opportunities.<br /> <br /> Practical ethics<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with specific governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. decision makers’ and civil servants’ capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> definition: Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organizational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behavior. <br /> <br /> Instead of focussing at the code or the principles, the norms and the values, we focus at the cultivation of the ethical person, the self-formation as an ethical subject involving practices of forming the ethical political subject.<br /> <br /> Which attitudes and practices could make possible ethically sensitive, negotiated settlements between different groups and individuals in the collaboration process and the construction of communities?<br /> <br /> Focus on the attitude of a divers set of policy makers. Not in an administrative sense.<br /> <br /> A more informal and affective perspective; a look into the antropology of policy makers<br /> <br /> Social innovation: instead of looking at shared norms and values we ….a closer look into the process. Not follow a pre given set of norms and values but looking at the process of altering the meaning of what is is to be social.<br /> <br /> will enable us to identify more precisely the problems associated with…..as the are constructed in the proces of social innovation. We focus on the process dimension of SI as this dimension is most relevant to the governance challenges….<br /> <br /> SI is not only innovation that is directed at social goals but also uses social means. Social means refer to the development of new or transformation of social relations. <br /> <br /> Look at the interaction among divers conscious actors on a small scale. <br /> <br /> Grassroots movements places where they excercise their responsibility. A close look into micropolitical opportunities. <br /> <br /> Local forms of social innovation tend to highlight the need for necognition and reprensentation and could hence help to improve conventional welfare state politics. <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 5 - What happens when you become the best practise ===<br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd<br /> * de rol van plaats<br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie<br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Unit of analysis: localized social innovations (against the restructuring of the well-fare state) <br /> <br /> and include its spatial form and institutional embedding<br /> <br /> best pracice: Ulrum (+ dZH?)<br /> <br /> we approach localized forms of SI against the backdrop of the restructering of the wellfare state + new social challenges (participation and joint decision making?)<br /> <br /> focus: governance challenges + dilemma’s <br /> <br /> proces: risks<br /> <br /> best practice -> exposure -> effects?<br /> <br /> Internal relations (+ encounter with the stranger)<br /> <br /> Leaving space to citizens’ and communities’ self-organisation -> risks for:<br /> <br /> the local organisation (focus local promoters): what happens with internal relations, living up to expectations, pressure (subsidies), timeframes and publicity <br /> <br /> public institutions (focus key persons in strategic public institutions): their biggest challenge is to create favourable conditions + risks (inequality, keeping control over exclusionary processes, avoiding risks of delegation and passive subsidiary).<br /> <br /> Influenced by political pressures which are again influenced by socio-economic and socio-demographic challenges like legitimacy and inclusiveness. Look into the posibilities and the boundaries of citizenship.<br /> <br /> Actors putting forward SI initiatives should learn to actively act (on different scales)<br /> <br /> the question is: how is it possible to create a good balance between public care and responsibility. <br /> <br /> Place making: look at the potential of place-based forms of solidarity and care. Recent thinking about citizenship. Look at what people actually do. Who is active in the public space? Increased importance of place in our society. Making place becomes an important project.<br /> <br /> functions as a microprocess that makes macropolitical settlement possible<br /> <br /> a better uderstanding of the balance among social, manegerial and political aims, devoting a special attention to responsability and accountability, both within the grass roots movement and public institutions as well as their partnerships with different kind of actors. (?)<br /> <br /> Closer look into practice of social innovation: to identify more precisely the specific problems associated; a closer look at the collaboration, interdependence, the awareness of it and the actual creation of active trust and reflexive engagement. <br /> <br /> Analyse how these tensions play out in actual practices as they are constructed in practice of social innovation.<br /> <br /> Also contextual conditions that facilitate or hinder si.<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 6 - Auto-Ethnography ===<br /> * Professional als object van solidariteit.<br /> * buffer zijn / risico absorberen<br /> * pedagogie als discipline?<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......{{Project config}}<br /> {{Project<br /> |Supercontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Project type=SSM, Standaard<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Name=Papers & Articles<br /> |Start date=2017/07/06<br /> |Summary=Written papers and articles<br /> |Show summary=Ja<br /> |Show navigation tree=Ja<br /> |Show sub projects=Ja<br /> |Show participants=Nee<br /> |Show sources=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=PR_00144&diff=49069 PR 00144 2017-11-01T16:01:10Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>== Keywords to describe our research: ==<br /> * Cross-disciplinary approach to study social innovation<br /> <br /> == Abstracts ==<br /> Identify the purpose (motivation)<br /> * Why did you decide to do this study or project?<br /> * How did you conduct your research?<br /> * Why is this research and your findings important?<br /> * Why should someone read your entire essay?<br /> * This section should include the importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the impact it might have if successful.<br /> Explain the problem at hand (problem statement)<br /> * What problem is your research trying to better understand or solve?<br /> * What is the scope of your study - a general problem, or something specific?<br /> * What is your main claim or argument?<br /> Describe the method (approach)<br /> <br /> Give your conclusion<br /> * What are the implications of your work?<br /> * Are your results general or very specific?<br /> <br /> Outline --> Introduction - Body - Conclusion. Two paragraphs up to one page of text. ~ 300 words. <br /> <br /> === Paper 1 - Theoretical paper ===<br /> * De huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistische / minimalistisch en transformative / radical opzoeken).<br /> ** Minimalist - Maximalist: "A third type of radical innovation has been elaborated by Mangabeira Unger. He distinguishes between '''minimalist social innovations''' which give a human face to an otherwise unsupportable situation, and '''maximalist social innovations''' that aim at deep changes. ”<br /> ** Transformative - Radical <br /> * GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> * Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken.<br /> * Combinatie met Human and Social Geography<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Instead of joining the greater discussion on the uses of social innovation and its definition, this study focusses on the process. It aims at elucidating what happens during the process. <br /> <br /> .... a closer focus on the process <br /> <br /> ....This study.... takes a social geography lens by drawing on the concepts of place and community <br /> <br /> .... looks at micro connections between individuals.... <br /> <br /> .... a cross-disciplinary approach between policy administration and human & social geography <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for....... researchers, practisioners and policy makers interested in the greater picture of social innovation <br /> <br /> === Paper 2 - The process of social innovation ===<br /> * lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen?<br /> * relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn?<br /> * inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur!<br /> * etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen (public administration). Etnografie en innovatie.<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> While previous studies often focussed on the organisational level, this study explores the social innovation process on the micro level of the individual. Instead of looking at leadership and the capabilities and competences of human change agents, this study focusses on the relations between the individual people taking part in the social innovation process. <br /> <br /> Moulaert: Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organisational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behaviour. <br /> <br /> .... Concepts? The encounter &...? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for researchers and practisioners in the public administration discipline. <br /> <br /> === Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself? ===<br /> <br /> * link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat:<br /> * zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie?<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Role of ethics in micro practices<br /> <br /> Concept of ‘care’ sometimes used as an alternative to the concept of solidarity<br /> <br /> Specific focus on ethics: how do people take care of each other; ethics of care<br /> <br /> Ethics of care: looks at ethics which pays more attention to emotional and private role of ethical judgments.<br /> <br /> Look at the actual practices in everyday life settings and grass-roots movements<br /> <br /> Care for each other plays everywhere; we look at how it works in neighbourhoods and in the family. <br /> <br /> Focus on the individual experiences.<br /> <br /> Why: better understanding of how all those individual choices work through the way society changes.<br /> <br /> Again: role encounter and place: We need to think more carefully about which types of encounters are sought, and by whom, and which are avoided, and by whom.<br /> <br /> The emphasis is placed not just on immediate contact experiences, but also on how peoples accrued histories of social experience and material circumstances may also contribute to their feelings about different sorts of encounters. In particular, how do 'real' and 'imagined' feelings and practices of care inhibit or open up the possibilities that a bridge being made between people's attitudes to particular individuals and to wider social groups?<br /> <br /> aim: to recognize cares and different responsibilities formed in material, technological, symbolic and imagined space. ....can be extended as a form of interest in the commons.<br /> <br /> To scan the landscape for evidence and proposals for new ways of gathering diversity into a functioning ‘commons’. <br /> <br /> Commons: seen as: <br /> <br /> Argument link with social innovation: the role of ethics in community building: <br /> <br /> Not a focus on the innovative individual but: <br /> <br /> are the different ways to care for each other that arise in the community a social innovation in itself? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 4 - Politics of care ===<br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon.<br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers.<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with socifik governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. (focus: decision makers’ and civil servants’ ) capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> In this paper we look at political responsability and political practice. What might a politics of care be? How might local politics participate in that ethics of care and building new communities and collaboration? Is this paper we will examine the affective dimension of political subjects and opportunities.<br /> <br /> Practical ethics<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with specific governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. decision makers’ and civil servants’ capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> definition: Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organizational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behavior. <br /> <br /> Instead of focussing at the code or the principles, the norms and the values, we focus at the cultivation of the ethical person, the self-formation as an ethical subject involving practices of forming the ethical political subject.<br /> <br /> Which attitudes and practices could make possible ethically sensitive, negotiated settlements between different groups and individuals in the collaboration process and the construction of communities?<br /> <br /> Focus on the attitude of a divers set of policy makers. Not in an administrative sense.<br /> <br /> A more informal and affective perspective; a look into the antropology of policy makers<br /> <br /> Social innovation: instead of looking at shared norms and values we ….a closer look into the process. Not follow a pre given set of norms and values but looking at the process of altering the meaning of what is is to be social.<br /> <br /> will enable us to identify more precisely the problems associated with…..as the are constructed in the proces of social innovation. We focus on the process dimension of SI as this dimension is most relevant to the governance challenges….<br /> <br /> SI is not only innovation that is directed at social goals but also uses social means. Social means refer to the development of new or transformation of social relations. <br /> <br /> Look at the interaction among divers conscious actors on a small scale. <br /> <br /> Grassroots movements places where they excercise their responsibility. A close look into micropolitical opportunities. <br /> <br /> Local forms of social innovation tend to highlight the need for necognition and reprensentation and could hence help to improve conventional welfare state politics. <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 5 - What happens when you become the best practise ===<br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd<br /> * de rol van plaats<br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie<br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Unit of analysis: localized social innovations (against the restructuring of the well-fare state) <br /> <br /> and include its spatial form and institutional embedding<br /> <br /> best pracice: Ulrum (+ dZH?)<br /> <br /> we approach localized forms of SI against the backdrop of the restructering of the wellfare state + new social challenges (participation and joint decision making?)<br /> <br /> focus: governance challenges + dilemma’s <br /> <br /> proces: risks<br /> <br /> best practice -> exposure -> effects?<br /> <br /> Internal relations (+ encounter with the stranger)<br /> <br /> Leaving space to citizens’ and communities’ self-organisation -> risks for:<br /> <br /> the local organisation (focus local promoters): what happens with internal relations, living up to expectations, pressure (subsidies), timeframes and publicity <br /> <br /> public institutions (focus key persons in strategic public institutions): their biggest challenge is to create favourable conditions + risks (inequality, keeping control over exclusionary processes, avoiding risks of delegation and passive subsidiary).<br /> <br /> Influenced by political pressures which are again influenced by socio-economic and socio-demographic challenges like legitimacy and inclusiveness. Look into the posibilities and the boundaries of citizenship.<br /> <br /> Actors putting forward SI initiatives should learn to actively act (on different scales)<br /> <br /> the question is: how is it possible to create a good balance between public care and responsibility. <br /> <br /> Place making: look at the potential of place-based forms of solidarity and care. Recent thinking about citizenship. Look at what people actually do. Who is active in the public space? Increased importance of place in our society. Making place becomes an important project.<br /> <br /> functions as a microprocess that makes macropolitical settlement possible<br /> <br /> a better uderstanding of the balance among social, manegerial and political aims, devoting a special attention to responsability and accountability, both within the grass roots movement and public institutions as well as their partnerships with different kind of actors. (?)<br /> <br /> Closer look into practice of social innovation: to identify more precisely the specific problems associated; a closer look at the collaboration, interdependence, the awareness of it and the actual creation of active trust and reflexive engagement. <br /> <br /> Analyse how these tensions play out in actual practices as they are constructed in practice of social innovation.<br /> <br /> Also contextual conditions that facilitate or hinder si.<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 6 - Auto-Ethnography ===<br /> * Professional als object van solidariteit.<br /> * buffer zijn / risico absorberen<br /> * pedagogie als discipline?<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......{{Project config}}<br /> {{Project<br /> |Supercontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Project type=SSM, Standaard<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Name=Papers & Articles<br /> |Start date=2017/07/06<br /> |Summary=Written papers and articles<br /> |Show summary=Ja<br /> |Show navigation tree=Ja<br /> |Show sub projects=Ja<br /> |Show participants=Nee<br /> |Show sources=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=PR_00144&diff=49068 PR 00144 2017-11-01T15:58:53Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>== Keywords to describe our research: ==<br /> * Cross-disciplinary approach to study social innovation<br /> <br /> == Abstracts ==<br /> Identify the purpose (motivation)<br /> * Why did you decide to do this study or project?<br /> * How did you conduct your research?<br /> * Why is this research and your findings important?<br /> * Why should someone read your entire essay?<br /> * This section should include the importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the impact it might have if successful.<br /> Explain the problem at hand (problem statement)<br /> * What problem is your research trying to better understand or solve?<br /> * What is the scope of your study - a general problem, or something specific?<br /> * What is your main claim or argument?<br /> Describe the method (approach)<br /> <br /> Give your conclusion<br /> * What are the implications of your work?<br /> * Are your results general or very specific?<br /> <br /> Outline --> Introduction - Body - Conclusion. Two paragraphs up to one page of text. ~ 300 words. <br /> <br /> === Paper 1 - Theoretical paper ===<br /> * De huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistische / minimalistisch en transformative / radical opzoeken).<br /> ** Minimalist - Maximalist: "A third type of radical innovation has been elaborated by Mangabeira Unger. He distinguishes between '''minimalist social innovations''' which give a human face to an otherwise unsupportable situation, and '''maximalist social innovations''' that aim at deep changes. ”<br /> ** Transformative - Radical <br /> * GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> * Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken.<br /> * Combinatie met Human and Social Geography<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Instead of joining the greater discussion on the uses of social innovation and its definition, this study focusses on the process. It aims at elucidating what happens during the process. <br /> <br /> .... a closer focus on the process <br /> <br /> ....This study.... takes a social geography lens by drawing on the concepts of place and community <br /> <br /> .... looks at micro connections between individuals.... <br /> <br /> .... a cross-disciplinary approach between policy administration and human & social geography <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for....... researchers, practisioners and policy makers interested in the greater picture of social innovation <br /> <br /> === Paper 2 - The process of social innovation ===<br /> * lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen?<br /> * relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn?<br /> * inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur!<br /> * etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen (public administration). Etnografie en innovatie.<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> While previous studies often focussed on the organisational level, this study explores the social innovation process on the micro level of the individual. Instead of looking at leadership and the capabilities and competences of human change agents, this study focusses on the relations between the individual people taking part in the social innovation process. <br /> <br /> Moulaert: Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organisational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behaviour. <br /> <br /> .... Concepts? The encounter &...? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for researchers and practisioners in the public administration discipline. <br /> <br /> === Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself? ===<br /> <br /> * link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat:<br /> * zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie?<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Role of ethics in micro practices<br /> <br /> Concept of ‘care’ sometimes used as an alternative to the concept of solidarity<br /> <br /> Specific focus on ethics: how do people take care of each other; ethics of care<br /> <br /> Ethics of care: looks at ethics which pays more attention to emotional and private role of ethical judgments.<br /> <br /> Look at the actual practices in everyday life settings and grass-roots movements<br /> <br /> Care for each other plays everywhere; we look at how it works in neighbourhoods and in the family. <br /> <br /> Focus on the individual experiences.<br /> <br /> Why: better understanding of how all those individual choices work through the way society changes.<br /> <br /> Again: role encounter and place: We need to think more carefully about which types of encounters are sought, and by whom, and which are avoided, and by whom.<br /> <br /> The emphasis is placed not just on immediate contact experiences, but also on how peoples accrued histories of social experience and material circumstances may also contribute to their feelings about different sorts of encounters. In particular, how do 'real' and 'imagined' feelings and practices of care inhibit or open up the possibilities that a bridge being made between people's attitudes to particular individuals and to wider social groups?<br /> <br /> aim: to recognize cares and different responsibilities formed in material, technological, symbolic and imagined space. ....can be extended as a form of interest in the commons.<br /> <br /> To scan the landscape for evidence and proposals for new ways of gathering diversity into a functioning ‘commons’. <br /> <br /> Commons: seen as: <br /> <br /> Argument link with social innovation: the role of ethics in community building: <br /> <br /> Not a focus on the innovative individual but: <br /> <br /> are the different ways to care for each other that arise in the community a social innovation in itself? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 4 - Politics of care ===<br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon.<br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers.<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with socifik governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. (focus: decision makers’ and civil servants’ ) capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> In this paper we look at political responsability and political practice. What might a politics of care be? How might local politics participate in that ethics of care and building new communities and collaboration? Is this paper we will examine the affective dimension of political subjects and opportunities.<br /> <br /> Practical ethics<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with specific governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. decision makers’ and civil servants’ capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> definition: Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organizational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behavior. <br /> <br /> Instead of focussing at the code or the principles, the norms and the values, we focus at the cultivation of the ethical person, the self-formation as an ethical subject involving practices of forming the ethical political subject.<br /> <br /> Which attitudes and practices could make possible ethically sensitive, negotiated settlements between different groups and individuals in the collaboration process and the construction of communities?<br /> <br /> Focus on the attitude of a divers set of policy makers. Not in an administrative sense.<br /> <br /> A more informal and affective perspective; a look into the antropology of policy makers<br /> <br /> Social innovation: instead of looking at shared norms and values we ….a closer look into the process. Not follow a pre given set of norms and values but looking at the process of altering the meaning of what is is to be social.<br /> <br /> will enable us to identify more precisely the problems associated with…..as the are constructed in the proces of social innovation. We focus on the process dimension of SI as this dimension is most relevant to the governance challenges….<br /> <br /> SI is not only innovation that is directed at social goals but also uses social means. Social means refer to the development of new or transformation of social relations. <br /> <br /> Look at the interaction among divers conscious actors on a small scale. <br /> <br /> Grassroots movements places where they excercise their responsibility. A close look into micropolitical opportunities. <br /> <br /> Local forms of social innovation tend to highlight the need for necognition and reprensentation and could hence help to improve conventional welfare state politics. <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 5 - What happens when you become the best practise ===<br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd<br /> * de rol van plaats<br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie<br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Unit of analysis: localized social innovations <br /> <br /> and include its spatial form and institutional embedding<br /> <br /> best pracice: Ulrum (+ dZH?)<br /> <br /> we approach localized forms of SI against the backdrop of the restructering of the wellfare state + new social challenges (participation and joint decision making?)<br /> <br /> focus: governance challenges + dilemma’s <br /> <br /> proces: risks<br /> <br /> best practice -> exposure -> effects?<br /> <br /> Internal relations (+ encounter with the stranger)<br /> <br /> Leaving space to citizens’ and communities’ self-organisation -> risks for:<br /> <br /> the local organisation (focus local promoters): what happens with internal relations, living up to expectations, pressure (subsidies), timeframes and publicity <br /> <br /> public institutions (focus key persons in strategic public institutions): their biggest challenge is to create favourable conditions + risks (inequality, keeping control over exclusionary processes, avoiding risks of delegation and passive subsidiary).<br /> <br /> Influenced by political pressures which are again influenced by socio-economic and socio-demographic challenges like legitimacy and inclusiveness. Look into the posibilities and the boundaries of citizenship.<br /> <br /> Actors putting forward SI initiatives should learn to actively act (on different scales)<br /> <br /> the question is: how is it possible to create a good balance between public care and responsibility. <br /> <br /> Place making: look at the potential of place-based forms of solidarity and care. Recent thinking about citizenship. Look at what people actually do. Who is active in the public space? Increased importance of place in our society. Making place becomes an important project.<br /> <br /> functions as a microprocess that makes macropolitical settlement possible<br /> <br /> a better uderstanding of the balance among social, manegerial and political aims, devoting a special attention to responsability and accountability, both within the grass roots movement and public institutions as well as their partnerships with different kind of actors. (?)<br /> <br /> Closer look into practice of social innovation: to identify more precisely the specific problems associated; a closer look at the collaboration, interdependence, the awareness of it and the actual creation of active trust and reflexive engagement. <br /> <br /> Analyse how these tensions play out in actual practices as they are constructed in practice of social innovation.<br /> <br /> Also contextual conditions that facilitate or hinder si.<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 6 - Auto-Ethnography ===<br /> * Professional als object van solidariteit.<br /> * buffer zijn / risico absorberen<br /> * pedagogie als discipline?<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......{{Project config}}<br /> {{Project<br /> |Supercontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Project type=SSM, Standaard<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Name=Papers & Articles<br /> |Start date=2017/07/06<br /> |Summary=Written papers and articles<br /> |Show summary=Ja<br /> |Show navigation tree=Ja<br /> |Show sub projects=Ja<br /> |Show participants=Nee<br /> |Show sources=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=PR_00144&diff=49062 PR 00144 2017-10-31T15:38:04Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>== Keywords to describe our research: ==<br /> * Cross-disciplinary approach to study social innovation<br /> <br /> == Abstracts ==<br /> Identify the purpose (motivation)<br /> * Why did you decide to do this study or project?<br /> * How did you conduct your research?<br /> * Why is this research and your findings important?<br /> * Why should someone read your entire essay?<br /> * This section should include the importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the impact it might have if successful.<br /> Explain the problem at hand (problem statement)<br /> * What problem is your research trying to better understand or solve?<br /> * What is the scope of your study - a general problem, or something specific?<br /> * What is your main claim or argument?<br /> Describe the method (approach)<br /> <br /> Give your conclusion<br /> * What are the implications of your work?<br /> * Are your results general or very specific?<br /> <br /> Outline --> Introduction - Body - Conclusion. Two paragraphs up to one page of text. ~ 300 words. <br /> <br /> === Paper 1 - Theoretical paper ===<br /> * De huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistische / minimalistisch en transformative / radical opzoeken).<br /> ** Minimalist - Maximalist: "A third type of radical innovation has been elaborated by Mangabeira Unger. He distinguishes between '''minimalist social innovations''' which give a human face to an otherwise unsupportable situation, and '''maximalist social innovations''' that aim at deep changes. ”<br /> ** Transformative - Radical <br /> * GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> * Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken.<br /> * Combinatie met Human and Social Geography<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Instead of joining the greater discussion on the uses of social innovation and its definition, this study focusses on the process. It aims at elucidating what happens during the process. <br /> <br /> .... a closer focus on the process <br /> <br /> ....This study.... takes a social geography lens by drawing on the concepts of place and community <br /> <br /> .... looks at micro connections between individuals.... <br /> <br /> .... a cross-disciplinary approach between policy administration and human & social geography <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for....... researchers, practisioners and policy makers interested in the greater picture of social innovation <br /> <br /> === Paper 2 - The process of social innovation ===<br /> * lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen?<br /> * relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn?<br /> * inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur!<br /> * etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen (public administration). Etnografie en innovatie.<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> While previous studies often focussed on the organisational level, this study explores the social innovation process on the micro level of the individual. Instead of looking at leadership and the capabilities and competences of human change agents, this study focusses on the relations between the individual people taking part in the social innovation process. <br /> <br /> Moulaert: Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organisational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behaviour. <br /> <br /> .... Concepts? The encounter &...? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for researchers and practisioners in the public administration discipline. <br /> <br /> === Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself? ===<br /> <br /> * link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat:<br /> * zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie?<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Role of ethics in micro practices<br /> <br /> Concept of ‘care’ sometimes used as an alternative to the concept of solidarity<br /> <br /> Specific focus on ethics: how do people take care of each other; ethics of care<br /> <br /> Ethics of care: looks at ethics which pays more attention to emotional and private role of ethical judgments.<br /> <br /> Look at the actual practices in everyday life settings and grass-roots movements<br /> <br /> Care for each other plays everywhere; we look at how it works in neighbourhoods and in the family. <br /> <br /> Focus on the individual experiences.<br /> <br /> Why: better understanding of how all those individual choices work through the way society changes.<br /> <br /> Again: role encounter and place: We need to think more carefully about which types of encounters are sought, and by whom, and which are avoided, and by whom.<br /> <br /> The emphasis is placed not just on immediate contact experiences, but also on how peoples accrued histories of social experience and material circumstances may also contribute to their feelings about different sorts of encounters. In particular, how do 'real' and 'imagined' feelings and practices of care inhibit or open up the possibilities that a bridge being made between people's attitudes to particular individuals and to wider social groups?<br /> <br /> aim: to recognize cares and different responsibilities formed in material, technological, symbolic and imagined space. ....can be extended as a form of interest in the commons.<br /> <br /> To scan the landscape for evidence and proposals for new ways of gathering diversity into a functioning ‘commons’. <br /> <br /> Commons: seen as: <br /> <br /> Argument link with social innovation: the role of ethics in community building: <br /> <br /> Not a focus on the innovative individual but: <br /> <br /> are the different ways to care for each other that arise in the community a social innovation in itself? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 4 - Politics of care ===<br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon.<br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers.<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with socifik governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. decision makers’ and civil servants’ capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> In this paper we look at political responsability and political practice. What might a politics of care be? How might local politics participate in that ethics of care and building new communities and collaboration? Is this paper we will examine the affective dimension of political subjects and opportunities.<br /> <br /> Practical ethics<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with specific governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. decision makers’ and civil servants’ capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organisational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behaviour. <br /> <br /> Instead of focussing at the code or the principles, the norms and the values, we focus at the cultivation of the ethical person, the self-formation as an ethical subject involving practices of forming the ethical political subject.<br /> <br /> Which attitudes and practices could make possible ethically sensitive, negotiated settlements between different groups and individuals in the collaboration process and the construction of communities?<br /> <br /> Focus on the attitude of a divers set of policy makers. Not in an administrative sense.<br /> <br /> A more informal and affective perspective; a look into the antropology of policy makers<br /> <br /> Social innovation: instead of looking at shared norms and values we ….a closer look into the process. Not follow a pre given set of norms and values but looking at the process of altering the meaning of what is is to be social.<br /> <br /> will enable us to identify more precisely the problems associated with…..as the are constructed in the proces of social innovation. We focus on the process dimension of SI as this dimension is most relevant to the governance challenges….<br /> <br /> SI is not only innovation that is directed at social goals but also uses social means. Social means refer to the development of new or transformation of social relations. <br /> <br /> Look at the interaction among divers conscious actors on a small scale. <br /> <br /> Grassroots movements places where they excercise their responsibility. A close look into micropolitical opportunities. <br /> <br /> Local forms of social innovation tend to highlight the need for necognition and reprensentation and could hence help to improve conventional welfare state politics. <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 5 - What happens when you become the best practise ===<br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd<br /> * de rol van plaats<br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie<br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Closer look into practice of social innovation: to identify more precisely the specific problems associated; a closer look at the collaboration, interdependence, the awareness of it and the actual creation of active trust and reflexieve engagement. <br /> <br /> Analyse how these tensions play out in actual practices as they are constructed in practice of social innovation. <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 6 - Auto-Ethnography ===<br /> * Professional als object van solidariteit.<br /> * buffer zijn / risico absorberen<br /> * pedagogie als discipline?<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......{{Project config}}<br /> {{Project<br /> |Supercontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Project type=SSM, Standaard<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Name=Papers & Articles<br /> |Start date=2017/07/06<br /> |Summary=Written papers and articles<br /> |Show summary=Ja<br /> |Show navigation tree=Ja<br /> |Show sub projects=Ja<br /> |Show participants=Nee<br /> |Show sources=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=PR_00144&diff=49055 PR 00144 2017-10-31T11:04:54Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>== Keywords to describe our research: ==<br /> * Cross-disciplinary approach to study social innovation<br /> <br /> == Abstracts ==<br /> Identify the purpose (motivation)<br /> * Why did you decide to do this study or project?<br /> * How did you conduct your research?<br /> * Why is this research and your findings important?<br /> * Why should someone read your entire essay?<br /> * This section should include the importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the impact it might have if successful.<br /> Explain the problem at hand (problem statement)<br /> * What problem is your research trying to better understand or solve?<br /> * What is the scope of your study - a general problem, or something specific?<br /> * What is your main claim or argument?<br /> Describe the method (approach)<br /> <br /> Give your conclusion<br /> * What are the implications of your work?<br /> * Are your results general or very specific?<br /> <br /> Outline --> Introduction - Body - Conclusion. Two paragraphs up to one page of text. ~ 300 words. <br /> <br /> === Paper 1 - Theoretical paper ===<br /> * De huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistische / minimalistisch en transformative / radical opzoeken).<br /> ** Minimalist - Maximalist: "A third type of radical innovation has been elaborated by Mangabeira Unger. He distinguishes between '''minimalist social innovations''' which give a human face to an otherwise unsupportable situation, and '''maximalist social innovations''' that aim at deep changes. ”<br /> ** Transformative - Radical <br /> * GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> * Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken.<br /> * Combinatie met Human and Social Geography<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Instead of joining the greater discussion on the uses of social innovation and its definition, this study focusses on the process. It aims at elucidating what happens during the process. <br /> <br /> .... a closer focus on the process <br /> <br /> ....This study.... takes a social geography lens by drawing on the concepts of place and community <br /> <br /> .... looks at micro connections between individuals.... <br /> <br /> .... a cross-disciplinary approach between policy administration and human & social geography <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for....... researchers, practisioners and policy makers interested in the greater picture of social innovation <br /> <br /> === Paper 2 - The process of social innovation ===<br /> * lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen?<br /> * relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn?<br /> * inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur!<br /> * etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen (public administration). Etnografie en innovatie.<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> While previous studies often focussed on the organisational level, this study explores the social innovation process on the micro level of the individual. Instead of looking at leadership and the capabilities and competences of human change agents, this study focusses on the relations between the individual people taking part in the social innovation process. <br /> <br /> .... Concepts? The encounter &...? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for researchers and practisioners in the public administration discipline. <br /> <br /> === Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself? ===<br /> <br /> * link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat:<br /> * zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie?<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Role of ethics in micro practices<br /> <br /> Concept of ‘care’ sometimes used as an alternative to the concept of solidarity<br /> <br /> Specific focus on ethics: how do people take care of each other; ethics of care<br /> <br /> Ethics of care: looks at ethics which pays more attention to emotional and private role of ethical judgments.<br /> <br /> Look at the actual practices in everyday life settings and grass-roots movements<br /> <br /> Care for each other plays everywhere; we look at how it works in neighbourhoods and in the family. <br /> <br /> Focus on the individual experiences.<br /> <br /> Why: better understanding of how all those individual choices work through the way society changes.<br /> <br /> Again: role encounter and place: We need to think more carefully about which types of encounters are sought, and by whom, and which are avoided, and by whom.<br /> <br /> The emphasis is placed not just on immediate contact experiences, but also on how peoples accrued histories of social experience and material circumstances may also contribute to their feelings about different sorts of encounters. In particular, how do 'real' and 'imagined' feelings and practices of care inhibit or open up the possibilities that a bridge being made between people's attitudes to particular individuals and to wider social groups?<br /> <br /> aim: to recognize cares and different responsibilities formed in material, technological, symbolic and imagined space. ....can be extended as a form of interest in the commons.<br /> <br /> To scan the landscape for evidence and proposals for new ways of gathering diversity into a functioning ‘commons’. <br /> <br /> Commons: seen as: <br /> <br /> Argument link with social innovation: the role of ethics in community building: <br /> <br /> Not a focus on the innovative individual but: <br /> <br /> are the different ways to care for each other that arise in the community a social innovation in itself? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 4 - Politics of care ===<br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon.<br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers.<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with socifik governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. decision makers’ and civil servants’ capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> In this paper we look at political responsability and political practice. What might a politics of care be? How might local politics participate in that ethics of care and building new communities and collaboration? Is this paper we will examine the affective dimension of political subjects and opportunities.<br /> <br /> Practical ethics<br /> <br /> The involvement of civil society …also renovating democracy. Thus transparancy, ligitimacy and democracy need to be guaranteed with specific governance technologies. This also depends on a cultural change in public administration, i.e. decision makers’ and civil servants’ capacity in learning to develop spaces for common decisions, integrate different sources of power and aims and elobarate new practices of working together. <br /> <br /> Social innovation is not innovation in its ends only. SI hence works towards social change through the deepening and the broadening of participation, the establishment of more inclusive organisational procedures, the development of the capacity for collective action and the fundamental change of human attitudes and behaviour. <br /> <br /> Instead of focussing at the code or the principles, the norms and the values, we focus at the cultivation of the ethical person, the self-formation as an ethical subject involving practices of forming the ethical political subject.<br /> <br /> Which attitudes and practices could make possible ethically sensitive, negotiated settlements between different groups and individuals in the collaboration process and the construction of communities?<br /> <br /> Focus on the attitude of a divers set of policy makers. Not in an administrative sense.<br /> <br /> A more informal and affective perspective; a look into the antropology of policy makers<br /> <br /> Social innovation: instead of looking at shared norms and values we ….a closer look into the process. Not follow a pre given set of norms and values but looking at the process of altering the meaning of what is is to be social.<br /> <br /> will enable us to identify more precisely the problems associated with…..as the are constructed in the proces of social innovation. We focus on the process dimension of SI as this dimension is most relevant to the governance challenges….<br /> <br /> SI is not only innovation that is directed at social goals but also uses social means. Social means refer to the development of new or transformation of social relations. <br /> <br /> Look at the interaction among divers conscious actors on a small scale. <br /> <br /> Grassroots movements places where they excercise their responsibility. A close look into micropolitical opportunities. <br /> <br /> Local forms of social innovation tend to highlight the need for necognition and reprensentation and could hence help to improve conventional welfare state politics. <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 5 - What happens when you become the best practise ===<br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd<br /> * de rol van plaats<br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie<br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Closer look into practice of social innovation: to identify more precisely the specific problems associated; a closer look at the collaboration, interdependence, the awareness of it and the actual creation of active trust and reflexieve engagement. <br /> <br /> Analyse how these tensions play out in actual practices as they are constructed in practice of social innovation. <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 6 - Auto-Ethnography ===<br /> * Professional als object van solidariteit.<br /> * buffer zijn / risico absorberen<br /> * pedagogie als discipline?<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......{{Project config}}<br /> {{Project<br /> |Supercontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Project type=SSM, Standaard<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Name=Papers & Articles<br /> |Start date=2017/07/06<br /> |Summary=Written papers and articles<br /> |Show summary=Ja<br /> |Show navigation tree=Ja<br /> |Show sub projects=Ja<br /> |Show participants=Nee<br /> |Show sources=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=PR_00144&diff=49054 PR 00144 2017-10-30T09:38:29Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>== Keywords to describe our research: ==<br /> * Cross-disciplinary approach to study social innovation<br /> <br /> == Abstracts ==<br /> Identify the purpose (motivation)<br /> * Why did you decide to do this study or project?<br /> * How did you conduct your research?<br /> * Why is this research and your findings important?<br /> * Why should someone read your entire essay?<br /> * This section should include the importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the impact it might have if successful.<br /> Explain the problem at hand (problem statement)<br /> * What problem is your research trying to better understand or solve?<br /> * What is the scope of your study - a general problem, or something specific?<br /> * What is your main claim or argument?<br /> Describe the method (approach)<br /> <br /> Give your conclusion<br /> * What are the implications of your work?<br /> * Are your results general or very specific?<br /> <br /> Outline --> Introduction - Body - Conclusion. Two paragraphs up to one page of text. ~ 300 words. <br /> <br /> === Paper 1 - Theoretical paper ===<br /> * De huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistische / minimalistisch en transformative / radical opzoeken).<br /> ** Minimalist - Maximalist: "A third type of radical innovation has been elaborated by Mangabeira Unger. He distinguishes between '''minimalist social innovations''' which give a human face to an otherwise unsupportable situation, and '''maximalist social innovations''' that aim at deep changes. ”<br /> ** Transformative - Radical <br /> * GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> * Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken.<br /> * Combinatie met Human and Social Geography<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Instead of joining the greater discussion on the uses of social innovation and its definition, this study focusses on the process. It aims at elucidating what happens during the process. <br /> <br /> .... a closer focus on the process <br /> <br /> ....This study.... takes a social geography lens by drawing on the concepts of place and community <br /> <br /> .... looks at micro connections between individuals.... <br /> <br /> .... a cross-disciplinary approach between policy administration and human & social geography <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for....... researchers, practisioners and policy makers interested in the greater picture of social innovation <br /> <br /> === Paper 2 - The process of social innovation ===<br /> * lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen?<br /> * relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn?<br /> * inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur!<br /> * etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen (public administration). Etnografie en innovatie.<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> While previous studies often focussed on the organisational level, this study explores the social innovation process on the micro level of the individual. Instead of looking at leadership and the capabilities and competences of human change agents, this study focusses on the relations between the individual people taking part in the social innovation process. <br /> <br /> .... Concepts? The encounter &...? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for researchers and practisioners in the public administration discipline. <br /> <br /> === Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself? ===<br /> <br /> * link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat:<br /> * zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie?<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Role of ethics in micro practices<br /> <br /> Concept of ‘care’ sometimes used as an alternative to the concept of solidarity<br /> <br /> Specific focus on ethics: how do people take care of each other; ethics of care<br /> <br /> Ethics of care: looks at ethics which pays more attention to emotional and private role of ethical judgments.<br /> <br /> Look at the actual practices in everyday life settings and grass-roots movements<br /> <br /> Care for each other plays everywhere; we look at how it works in neighbourhoods and in the family. <br /> <br /> Focus on the individual experiences.<br /> <br /> Why: better understanding of how all those individual choices work through the way society changes.<br /> <br /> Again: role encounter and place: We need to think more carefully about which types of encounters are sought, and by whom, and which are avoided, and by whom.<br /> <br /> The emphasis is placed not just on immediate contact experiences, but also on how peoples accrued histories of social experience and material circumstances may also contribute to their feelings about different sorts of encounters. In particular, how do 'real' and 'imagined' feelings and practices of care inhibit or open up the possibilities that a bridge being made between people's attitudes to particular individuals and to wider social groups?<br /> <br /> aim: to recognize cares and different responsibilities formed in material, technological, symbolic and imagined space. ....can be extended as a form of interest in the commons.<br /> <br /> To scan the landscape for evidence and proposals for new ways of gathering diversity into a functioning ‘commons’. <br /> <br /> Commons: seen as: <br /> <br /> Argument link with social innovation: the role of ethics in community building: <br /> <br /> Not a focus on the innovative individual but: <br /> <br /> are the different ways to care for each other that arise in the community a social innovation in itself? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 4 - Politics of care ===<br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon.<br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers.<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> In this paper we look at political responsability and political practice. What might a politics of care be? How might local politics participate in that ethics of care and building new communities and collaboration? Is this paper we will examine the affective dimension of political subjects and opportunities. <br /> <br /> Practical ethics<br /> <br /> Instead of focussing at the code or the principles, the norms and the values, we focus at the cultivation of the ethical person, the self-formation as an ethical subject involving practices of forming the ethical political subject.<br /> <br /> Which attitudes and practices could make possible ethically sensitive, negotiated settlements between different groups and individuals in the collaboration process and the construction of communities? <br /> <br /> Focus on the attitude of a divers set of policy makers. <br /> <br /> Not in an administrative sense.<br /> <br /> A more informal and affective perspective.<br /> <br /> A look into the antropology of policy makers<br /> <br /> Social innovation: instead of looking at shared norms and values we ….a closer look into the process. Not follow a pre given set of norms and values but looking at the process of altering the meaning of what is is to be social.<br /> <br /> Look at the interaction among divers conscious actors on a small scale. <br /> <br /> Grassroots movements places where they excercise their responsibility. A close look into micropolitical opportunities. <br /> <br /> Interesting for bestuurs- en beleidswetenschappen<br /> <br /> kennis is relevant voor praktijk. Voor diverse disciplines: geograaf (sociale en symbolische eigenschappen plaats tot stand) / pedagoog (gemeenschapsvorming en leerprocessen) / politieke wetenschap (burgerschap)<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 5 - What happens when you become the best practise ===<br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd<br /> * de rol van plaats<br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie<br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Closer look into practice of social innovation: to identify more precisely the specific problems associated; a closer look at the collaboration, interdependence, the awareness of it and the actual creation of active trust and reflexieve engagement. <br /> <br /> Analyse how these tensions play out in actual practices as they are constructed in practice of social innovation. <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 6 - Auto-Ethnography ===<br /> * Professional als object van solidariteit.<br /> * buffer zijn / risico absorberen<br /> * pedagogie als discipline?<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......{{Project config}}<br /> {{Project<br /> |Supercontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Project type=SSM, Standaard<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Name=Papers & Articles<br /> |Start date=2017/07/06<br /> |Summary=Written papers and articles<br /> |Show summary=Ja<br /> |Show navigation tree=Ja<br /> |Show sub projects=Ja<br /> |Show participants=Nee<br /> |Show sources=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=PR_00144&diff=49053 PR 00144 2017-10-29T14:32:23Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>== Keywords to describe our research: ==<br /> * Cross-disciplinary approach to study social innovation<br /> <br /> == Abstracts ==<br /> Identify the purpose (motivation)<br /> * Why did you decide to do this study or project?<br /> * How did you conduct your research?<br /> * Why is this research and your findings important?<br /> * Why should someone read your entire essay?<br /> * This section should include the importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the impact it might have if successful.<br /> Explain the problem at hand (problem statement)<br /> * What problem is your research trying to better understand or solve?<br /> * What is the scope of your study - a general problem, or something specific?<br /> * What is your main claim or argument?<br /> Describe the method (approach)<br /> <br /> Give your conclusion<br /> * What are the implications of your work?<br /> * Are your results general or very specific?<br /> <br /> Outline --> Introduction - Body - Conclusion. Two paragraphs up to one page of text. ~ 300 words. <br /> <br /> === Paper 1 - Theoretical paper ===<br /> * De huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistische / minimalistisch en transformative / radical opzoeken).<br /> ** Minimalist - Maximalist: "A third type of radical innovation has been elaborated by Mangabeira Unger. He distinguishes between '''minimalist social innovations''' which give a human face to an otherwise unsupportable situation, and '''maximalist social innovations''' that aim at deep changes. ”<br /> ** Transformative - Radical <br /> * GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> * Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken.<br /> * Combinatie met Human and Social Geography<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Instead of joining the greater discussion on the uses of social innovation and its definition, this study focusses on the process. It aims at elucidating what happens during the process. <br /> <br /> .... a closer focus on the process <br /> <br /> ....This study.... takes a social geography lens by drawing on the concepts of place and community <br /> <br /> .... looks at micro connections between individuals.... <br /> <br /> .... a cross-disciplinary approach between policy administration and human & social geography <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for....... researchers, practisioners and policy makers interested in the greater picture of social innovation <br /> <br /> === Paper 2 - The process of social innovation ===<br /> * lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen?<br /> * relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn?<br /> * inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur!<br /> * etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen (public administration). Etnografie en innovatie.<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> While previous studies often focussed on the organisational level, this study explores the social innovation process on the micro level of the individual. Instead of looking at leadership and the capabilities and competences of human change agents, this study focusses on the relations between the individual people taking part in the social innovation process. <br /> <br /> .... Concepts? The encounter &...? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for researchers and practisioners in the public administration discipline. <br /> <br /> === Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself? ===<br /> <br /> * link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat:<br /> * zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie?<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Role of ethics in micro practices<br /> <br /> Concept of ‘care’ sometimes used as an alternative to the concept of solidarity<br /> <br /> Specific focus on ethics: how do people take care of each other; ethics of care<br /> <br /> Ethics of care: looks at ethics which pays more attention to emotional and private role of ethical judgments.<br /> <br /> Look at the actual practices in everyday life settings and grass-roots movements<br /> <br /> Care for each other plays everywhere; we look at how it works in neighbourhoods and in the family. <br /> <br /> Focus on the individual experiences.<br /> <br /> Why: better understanding of how all those individual choices work through the way society changes.<br /> <br /> Again: role encounter and place: We need to think more carefully about which types of encounters are sought, and by whom, and which are avoided, and by whom.<br /> <br /> The emphasis is placed not just on immediate contact experiences, but also on how peoples accrued histories of social experience and material circumstances may also contribute to their feelings about different sorts of encounters. In particular, how do 'real' and 'imagined' feelings and practices of care inhibit or open up the possibilities that a bridge being made between people's attitudes to particular individuals and to wider social groups?<br /> <br /> aim: to recognize cares and different responsibilities formed in material, technological, symbolic and imagined space. ....can be extended as a form of interest in the commons.<br /> <br /> To scan the landscape for evidence and proposals for new ways of gathering diversity into a functioning ‘commons’. <br /> <br /> Commons: seen as: <br /> <br /> Argument link with social innovation: the role of ethics in community building: <br /> <br /> Not a focus on the innovative individual but: <br /> <br /> are the different ways to care for each other that arise in the community a social innovation in itself? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 4 - Politics of care ===<br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon.<br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers.<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Which attitudes and practices could make possible ethically sensitive, negotiated settlements between different groups and individuals in the collaboration process and the construction of communities? <br /> <br /> Focus on the attitude of a divers set of policy makers. <br /> <br /> Not in an administrative sense.<br /> <br /> A more informal and affective perspective.<br /> <br /> A look into the antropology of policy makers<br /> <br /> Social innovation: instead of looking at shared norms and values we ….a closer look into the process. Not follow a pre given set of norms and values but looking at the process of altering the meaning of what is is to be social.<br /> <br /> Look at the interaction among divers conscious actors on a small scale. <br /> <br /> Grassroots movements places where they excercise their responsibility. A close look into micropolitical opportunities. <br /> <br /> Interesting for bestuurs- en beleidswetenschappen<br /> <br /> kennis is relevant voor praktijk. Voor diverse disciplines: geograaf (sociale en symbolische eigenschappen plaats tot stand) / pedagoog (gemeenschapsvorming en leerprocessen) / politieke wetenschap (burgerschap)<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 5 - What happens when you become the best practise ===<br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd<br /> * de rol van plaats<br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie<br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Closer look into practice of social innovation: to identify more precisely the specific problems associated; a closer look at the collaboration, interdependence, the awareness of it and the actual creation of active trust and reflexieve engagement. <br /> <br /> Analyse how these tensions play out in actual practices as they are constructed in practice of social innovation. <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 6 - Auto-Ethnography ===<br /> * Professional als object van solidariteit.<br /> * buffer zijn / risico absorberen<br /> * pedagogie als discipline?<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......{{Project config}}<br /> {{Project<br /> |Supercontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Project type=SSM, Standaard<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Name=Papers & Articles<br /> |Start date=2017/07/06<br /> |Summary=Written papers and articles<br /> |Show summary=Ja<br /> |Show navigation tree=Ja<br /> |Show sub projects=Ja<br /> |Show participants=Nee<br /> |Show sources=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=PR_00144&diff=49047 PR 00144 2017-10-28T14:09:33Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>== Keywords to describe our research: ==<br /> * Cross-disciplinary approach to study social innovation<br /> <br /> == Abstracts ==<br /> Identify the purpose (motivation)<br /> * Why did you decide to do this study or project?<br /> * How did you conduct your research?<br /> * Why is this research and your findings important?<br /> * Why should someone read your entire essay?<br /> * This section should include the importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the impact it might have if successful.<br /> Explain the problem at hand (problem statement)<br /> * What problem is your research trying to better understand or solve?<br /> * What is the scope of your study - a general problem, or something specific?<br /> * What is your main claim or argument?<br /> Describe the method (approach)<br /> <br /> Give your conclusion<br /> * What are the implications of your work?<br /> * Are your results general or very specific?<br /> <br /> Outline --> Introduction - Body - Conclusion. Two paragraphs up to one page of text. ~ 300 words. <br /> <br /> === Paper 1 - Theoretical paper ===<br /> * De huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistische / minimalistisch en transformative / radical opzoeken).<br /> ** Minimalist - Maximalist: "A third type of radical innovation has been elaborated by Mangabeira Unger. He distinguishes between '''minimalist social innovations''' which give a human face to an otherwise unsupportable situation, and '''maximalist social innovations''' that aim at deep changes. ”<br /> ** Transformative - Radical <br /> * GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> * Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken.<br /> * Combinatie met Human and Social Geography<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Instead of joining the greater discussion on the uses of social innovation and its definition, this study focusses on the process. It aims at elucidating what happens during the process. <br /> <br /> .... a closer focus on the process <br /> <br /> ....This study.... takes a social geography lens by drawing on the concepts of place and community <br /> <br /> .... looks at micro connections between individuals.... <br /> <br /> .... a cross-disciplinary approach between policy administration and human & social geography <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for....... researchers, practisioners and policy makers interested in the greater picture of social innovation <br /> <br /> === Paper 2 - The process of social innovation ===<br /> * lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen?<br /> * relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn?<br /> * inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur!<br /> * etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen (public administration). Etnografie en innovatie.<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> While previous studies often focussed on the organisational level, this study explores the social innovation process on the micro level of the individual. Instead of looking at leadership and the capabilities and competences of human change agents, this study focusses on the relations between the individual people taking part in the social innovation process. <br /> <br /> .... Concepts? The encounter &...? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for researchers and practisioners in the public administration discipline. <br /> <br /> === Paper 3 - Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself? ===<br /> <br /> * link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat:<br /> * zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie?<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Role of ethics in micro practices<br /> <br /> Concept of care sometimes used as an alternative to the concept of solidarity<br /> <br /> Specific focus on ethics of care: how do people take care of each other<br /> <br /> Look at the actual practices in everyday life settings and grass-roots movements<br /> <br /> Focus on the individual experiences<br /> <br /> Again: role encounter and place: Reconsidering of the phenomenology of the encounter is to dislodge the politics of belonging from its current mooring in a discourse of strong social ties -> anders omschrijven.<br /> <br /> aim: recognize cares and different responsibilities formed in material, technological, symbolic and imagined space. ....can be extended as a form of interest in the commons.<br /> <br /> To scan the landscape for evidence and proposals for new ways of gathering diversity into a functioning commons.<br /> <br /> Link with social innovation: the role of ethics in community building: <br /> <br /> Not a focus on the innovative individual but: <br /> <br /> Are the different ways to care for each other that arise in the community a social innovation in itself? <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 4 - Politics of care ===<br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon.<br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers.<br /> '''ABSTRACT'''<br /> <br /> Closer look into practice of social innovation: to identify more precisely the specific problems associated; <br /> <br /> a closer look at the interdependence, the awareness of it and the actual creation of active trust and reflexieve engagement. <br /> <br /> Analyse how these tensions play out in actual practices as they are constructed in practice of social innovation. <br /> <br /> Focus on the attitude of a divers set of policy makers. Not in an administrative sense.<br /> <br /> A more informal and affective perspective.<br /> <br /> A look into the antroplogy of policy makers<br /> <br /> Social innovation: instead of looking at shared norms and values we ….a closer look into the sociation process. Not follow a pre given set of norms and values but looking at the process of altering the meaning of what is is to be social.<br /> <br /> Look at the interaction among divers conscious actors on a small scale. <br /> <br /> Interesting for bestuurs- en beleidswetenschappen<br /> <br /> kennis is relevant voor praktijk. Voor diverse disciplines: geograaf (sociale en symbolische eigenschappen plaats tot stand) / pedagoog (gemeenschapsvorming en leerprocessen) / politieke wetenschap (burgerschap)<br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 5 - What happens when you become the best practise ===<br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd<br /> * de rol van plaats<br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie<br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......<br /> <br /> === Paper 6 - Auto-Ethnography ===<br /> * Professional als object van solidariteit.<br /> * buffer zijn / risico absorberen<br /> * pedagogie als discipline?<br /> '''ABSTRACT''' <br /> <br /> .... The results of this research are relevant for.......{{Project config}}<br /> {{Project<br /> |Supercontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Project type=SSM, Standaard<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Name=Papers & Articles<br /> |Start date=2017/07/06<br /> |Summary=Written papers and articles<br /> |Show summary=Ja<br /> |Show navigation tree=Ja<br /> |Show sub projects=Ja<br /> |Show participants=Nee<br /> |Show sources=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=ZHDSM_Social_Capital&diff=48702 ZHDSM Social Capital 2017-10-06T09:40:22Z

<p>Petra: Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met ' {{InfKrt Concept |Context=ZHDSM context |prefLabel=Social Capital |definition=Social Capital |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme }}'</p> <hr /> <div><br /> {{InfKrt Concept<br /> |Context=ZHDSM context<br /> |prefLabel=Social Capital<br /> |definition=Social Capital<br /> |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=LC_00758&diff=48700 LC 00758 2017-10-06T08:36:28Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>'''Titles of our research (August 2017)''' <br /> <br /> '''Petra de Braal -''' <br /> <br /> '''Kim Boes -''' <br /> <br /> == Projectlogboek ==<br /> Hierin houden wij aantekeningen van besprekingen bij, de dingen die we al hebben geschreven en ook de monitoring en evaluatie van ons project. <br /> <br /> === Aantekeningen besprekingen ===<br /> <br /> ==== '''14.06.2017 - Antwerpen - Stijn, Kim, Petra''' ====<br /> * In ons eerste geschreven stuk praten we niet over de plaats/plek van de projecten. Deze zijn natuurlijk van belang en mogen daarom zeker niet vergeten worden. <br /> * Er worden een heleboel verschillende richtingen genoemd met bijpassende auteurs<br /> ** Het kleine verzet - Tine Hens. Collum in MoMagazine - 5 artikelen over project Stijn<br /> ** Geografie --> Care --> Doreen Massey <br /> ** Frans Thisse (sociale geografie) <br /> ** Feminisme --> Solidariteit --> Geography of effects <br /> ** The end of capitalism as we knew it - Graham and Gibson <br /> *** Ethics of the local <br /> *** Are we thinking Marxism <br /> * We moeten ook de andere kant van het verhaal beschrijven, de kant waar we meer kritisch naar kijken<br /> ** Mandy de Wilde - Als meedoen pijn doet <br /> ** Evelien Tonkens en Jan Willem Duyvendak in discussie met Jan Rotmans <br /> * Wij pikten "Imagined community" uit Ash Amin --> waar komt dit vandaan. Verbeelding en sense of place <br /> * Gill Valentine --> Geography of encounter - Contact hypothese <br /> * George Simmel - The Stranger<br /> * Kijk ook naar Cohesie en Segregatie <br /> <br /> ==== '''02.10.2017 - Antwerpen - Stijn, Kim, Petra''' ====<br /> Outline wordt als eerste besproken <br /> * Onvoldoende argumentatie in de outline, deze verder uitbreiden <br /> ** Alleen concepten is niet genoeg om het te argumenteren <br /> ** Geef meer en duidelijkere informatie rondom de keuze voor sociale innovatie, waar is de GAP<br /> ** huidige discussie gaat vooral om de verschillende definities van SI (wat is de correcte definitie). Wel aangeven waar in het debat / welke traditie we ons bevinden (maximalistisch / minimalistisch en transformatief / ....opzoeken).<br /> ** GAP: hoe het proces in zijn gang gaat is onvoldoende scherp. Zeker wat aan toe te voegen: microniveau. Een scherpere blik op SI.<br /> ** Wat gebeurt er? Daar is niet veel naar gekeken. <br /> * Proces is te weinig uitgelegd. Gaat te snel over en heeft meer info en uitleg nodig. <br /> ** Denk aan verschillende processen die er zijn <br /> ** Denk ook aan je positionering. Voor wie schrijven we de teksten <br /> * Als tip kunnen we gaan kijken naar de micro verbanden tussen mensen. Dit is tot nu toe weinig gedaan in de literatuur rondom sociale innovatie en zou dus een innovatieve invalshoek kunnen zijn voor ons onderzoek.<br /> <br /> '''Paper 1''' <br /> <br /> Dit mag een theoretisch paper zijn. Gericht naar en geplaatst in de algemene sociale innovatie literatuur. Zonder data (met case in het achterhoofd). <br /> * We gaan al in de richting van place and community in onze argumentatie. <br /> ** Amin en Massey zijn tot nu toe auteurs en richtingen die niet gelinkt zijn met sociale innovatie. Dit zou een nieuwe invalshoek kunnen zijn. <br /> ** publiek: andere SI onderzoekers <br /> '''Paper 2''' <br /> * Wie is het publiek van dit paper? Waar willen wij iets bereiken met de kennis die we hier hebben? Hier kijken naar andere actoren in het debat. <br /> ** Bestuurswetenschappen zou een richting kunnen zijn waar er verder nog niet veel naar het proces wordt gekeken. <br /> ** lijn: mooi dat er wordt gekeken naar het niveau van organisatie; maar wat gebeurt er op het niveau van individuen? <br /> ** relatie met overheden: kunnen publieke instellingen ook innovatief zijn? <br /> ** inter-organisatorisch kijken. Niet: wie is de leider / kenmerken e.d. Wel: hoe zit het met de verhouding tussen al die mensen. Dat mist in literatuur! <br /> ** etnografisch meerwaarde toevoegen. Gebeurt nog niet in bestuurswetenschappen. Etnografie en innovatie. <br /> ** Nadeel van die discipline: generieke modellen. <br /> ** Genoemd: intentional neighbouring. Christelijk / bewuste werkwijze/ vanuit overtuiging / werkt dat? <br /> ** concepten: proces: specifieke plaats / hoe kan dat ontmoeten er uit zien / nabijheid <br /> ** proces: individu al noemen / hoe vindt die ontmoeting plaats in specifieke ruimte en komt daar collaboration uit? Hoe? <br /> * NOTE: The Encounter wordt in de sociale wetenschappen theorie altijd gezien als een '''''ontmoeting tussen vreemden.''''' <br /> * Heeft een zwaardere lading; gaat over een specifiek type ontmoeting <br /> * Niet meer dan twee concepten per paper bespreken anders wordt het teveel. Traffic: 1 argument per paper / 2 concepten. Volgend paper: nuance aanbrengen (externe factor). <br /> '''Paper 3'''<br /> <br /> Hier willen we verder inzoomen op de individu. <br /> * Zouden verder in kunnen gaan op de ethiek; Ethics of care (Amin)<br /> ** Wat betekend het "zorgen voor elkaar". De typische rol van de man en de vrouw maar ook geloofsovertuiging; e.g. intentional neighbouring (christelijke mensen die in een achterstandsbuurt gaan wonen en effectief werken aan het opnieuw verbindingen maken tussen mensen om de kwaliteit van leven er weer te verhogen) <br /> ** Kijkt eigenlijk naar het klein individuele proces / ethics in microproces. <br /> ** specifiek: zorgdragen voor elkaar. <br /> ** In literatuur ethics soms gebruikt als alternatief voor solidariteit (feministische literatuur) <br /> ** specifiek kijken naar individuele ervaringen (techniek). <br /> ** link innovatie: rol van ethics in gemeenschap vormen. Is dat: <br /> ** zorgdragen voor ipv innovatief menstype te zijn (als individu) of is de ethics of care die in de gemeenschap ontstaat de sociale innovatie? <br /> * De vraag is dan: '''Ethics of care: Means to an end or end in itself?''' <br /> * welke concepten hier gebruiken? <br /> '''Paper 4'''<br /> <br /> Zouden willen kijken naar de houding van de politici zelf. Welke relatie moet je aangaan? <br /> * Kunnen eventueel kunnen kijken naar de affiniteit, het gevoel van mensen die in het bestuur zitten. <br /> * Hoe kun je politici hier in meenemen; houding cultiveren. Niet in bestuurlijke zin maar houding als persoon. <br /> * Kan geplaatst worden in de bestuurswetenschappen en/of beleidswetenschappen. <br /> * Op de lange termijn: luisteren <br /> * Hier vanuit antropologisch perspectief naar kijken / affectief <br /> * keuze: affectieve dimensie (hoe positioneert iemand zich en het project/ welke uitleg wordt gegeven / is iemand authentiek of wil hij mensen voor zijn/haar karretje spannen OF kijken naar waarden en normen. <br /> * antropologie van beleidsmakers. Kijkt men daar al naar in de bestuurswetenschappen of de beleidswetenschappen? <br /> '''Paper 5'''<br /> * Als je best practice wordt, wat doet dat dan met je? Wat gebeurd er met je? <br /> * Wat doet het als je wordt uitgekozen, busladingen geïnteresseerden langskomen, je een voorbeeld / succesvol wordt? <br /> * Dit bekijken met een externe blik en hoe het het project en de mensen en de plaats heeft veranderd <br /> * de rol van plaats <br /> * vanuit het perspectief van best practice / reflectie over de eigen positie <br /> * sociale mobiliteit / creëert hiërarchie / hoe valt dat in de groep <br /> * techniek: auto-etnografie <br /> * dilemma's: affectief / interne verhoudingen / exposure <br /> '''Paper 6'''<br /> * Verbinden aan paper 5. <br /> * Auto-etnografie van Petra om te kijken wat het doet met de persoon die dit proces inzet.<br /> ** Ben je een professional of ben je een bewoner?<br /> ** Kan je als professional je afsluiten voor wat er op de plek gebeurd? Stijn denkt dat dit wel kan. Stijn denkt: de professional gaat weg en kent deze reactie niet.<br /> ** Mensen vinden het lastig om verbindingen te blijven leggen met elkaar wanneer de professional weg is: Dit is risicovol, de Encounter is risicovol - Exposure. Professional als object van solidariteit. <br /> ** buffer zijn / risico absorberen <br /> ** pedagogie als discipline? <br /> <br /> Bespreking van de argumentatie die we hadden meegestuurd. <br /> * Alle definities van sociale innovatie bespreken. Beginnen met die van the Young Foundation <br /> * In hoofdstuk 4 maken we een te grote sprong tussen collaboration en social capital. Deze twee zijn nog ver van elkaar verwijderd. Overbruggend social capital zit daar nog wel tussen<br /> ** Als mensen anders zijn is collaboration veel moeilijker, hier is veel meer voor nodig dan wanneer mensen hetzelfde zijn. <br /> ** Putnam - Bowling alone: hoe werkt collaboratie. Decline social capital. Social capital is macro analyse. Wederzijds vertrouwen. collaboratie is samenwerken. <br /> ** Putnam: geen gebrek aan sociaal kapitaal maar: gebrek aan overbruggend sociaal kapitaal. Bij 'de vreemde' is dat veel moeilijker (proffesionals / organisatie / overheid) <br /> * Kijken naar literatuur rondom Ethnographie of innovation & Antropology of innovation <br /> <br /> === Geschreven teksten ===<br /> 02.05.2017 Petra de Braal - {{Cite|resource=File:Research_Introduction_-_Petra_de_Braal_Mei_2017.pdf|name=Research Introduction|dialog=process-file-dialog}} <br /> <br /> 14.06.2017 Petra de Braal en Kim Boes - {{Cite|resource=File:Social_innovation_–_Content_and_Process.pdf|name=Social innovation – Content and Process|dialog=process-file-dialog}}''': ''A discussion between Amin and the practical experiences we gained from our projects'''''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Monitoring, toetsing en evalueren ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> == Onderzoekslogboek ==<br /> <br /> Hierin houden wij het proces bij van de verschillende delen van ons onderzoek. <br /> === Aanpak van het verkrijgen van de onderzoeksvragen ===<br /> '''17.04.2017 Eerste onderzoeksvragen/thema's'''<br /> * Social Innovation<br /> ** Social Innovation Process<br /> *** The individual in the process<br /> **** How do they give meaning to their actions?<br /> **** How does this affect the co-production of self?<br /> <br /> '''02.05.2017 Onderzoeksvragen opgesteld in eerste stuk geschreven door Petra''' <br /> * How does reflexivity mediate the agency-structure dynamics in social innovation processes? <br /> * What is the role of narratives in the social innovation process? <br /> * What is the role of identity dynamics in the social innovation process? <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het opstellen van het onderzoeksplan ===<br /> <br /> ==== Eerste versie onderzoeksplan ====<br /> '''Email Stijn 28.08.2017''' <br /> <br /> ''"Bereiden jullie een document met een tijdsplanning voor jullie doctoraat voor?'' <br /> <br /> ''Kunnen jullie ook al een en ander op papier zetten over de structuur van jullie doctoraat? Mijn voorstel zou zijn dat jullie op artikels doctoreren (omvat een inleidend hoofdstuk die doctoraat kadert en positioneert in wetenschappelijk debat, minimaal vier papers met telkens een argument dat op basis van empirische gegevens wordt onderbouwd en een conclusie). De werkzaamheden kunnen zo in kleinere pakketjes opgedeeld kunnen worden, wat me in jullie geval meer hanteerbaar lijkt. Het zou goed zijn mochten jullie al eens nadenken wat jullie in elk van die hoofdstukken zouden kwijt willen (argument, dimensie van de algemene problematiek, welke case). Dit mag tentatief zijn, maar het zal een eerste idee geven van wat nodig is voor het doctoraat."''<br /> <br /> '''Reactie 02.10.2017'''<br /> <br /> ===== '''Paper 1''': Setting the scene for social innovation =====<br /> <u>Aim: Critical discussion between the current literature and our secondary data</u><br /> * Argumentation:<br /> ** Social innovation is under represented as a practise in the innovation research literature (Cajaiba-Santana 2014). However, increasingly the focus shifts also into the direction of social innovation centralised around tackling issues affecting society at large (Phillips et al. 2015). While it is recognised social innovation is a vital practise in todays society (Grimm et al. 2013), scholars ask for more research in this field (Mulgan 2006; Cajaiba-Santana 2014; Phillips et al. 2015). <br /> * Method - Secondary data<br /> ** Case: Ulrum & dZH <br /> <br /> ===== '''Paper 2''': The process of social innovation =====<br /> <u>Aim:</u> <br /> * Argumentation:<br /> ** While the literature on the business innovation process has been explored in-depth over the last decades, research focussing on the social innovation process is to date limited (Lettice and Parekh 2010; Phillips et al. 2015). <br /> * Concepts discussed:<br /> ** The encounter<br /> * Method - Case study method. Combination of secondary data (official documents, published articles, blog, etc.), interviews, and focus group<br /> ** Case: Combination of the data sets Ulrum & dZH <br /> <br /> ===== '''Paper 3''': Practises of care =====<br /> <u>Aim:</u><br /> * Argumentation:<br /> * Concepts discussed:<br /> ** <br /> * Method - Case study method. Combination of secondary data (official documents, published articles, blog, etc.), interviews, and focus group<br /> ** Case: Combination of the data sets Ulrum & dZH <br /> <br /> ===== '''Paper 4''': Politics of care - Governance =====<br /> <u>Aim:</u><br /> * Argumentation:<br /> * Concepts discussed:<br /> ** Agency<br /> ** Policy making<br /> * Method - Case study method. Combination of secondary data (official documents, published articles, blog, etc.), interviews, and focus group<br /> ** Case: Combination of the data sets Ulrum & dZH <br /> <br /> ===== '''Timeframe (version september 2017)''' =====<br /> '''Year 1 --> October 2018'''<br /> * Write theoretical paper with a critical discussion between current literature and secondary data <br /> * Collect data <br /> ** Conduct interviews<br /> ** Transcribe interviews <br /> ** Part analyses <br /> '''Year 2+3 = 27 months''' <br /> * Publish three empirical papers <br /> * Extra months could be included taken from the fourth year <br /> '''Year 4 --> 6 - 9 months''' <br /> * Write introduction and conclusion<br /> * Finishing touch <br /> '''Finish by December 2021'''<br /> <br /> {{Light Context<br /> |Supercontext=PR 00139<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Toppage=Process<br /> |Sequence number=1<br /> |Context type=Situation<br /> |Heading=Process<br /> |Show referred by=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=ZHDSM_Imagined_Community&diff=47591 ZHDSM Imagined Community 2017-07-14T08:44:22Z

<p>Petra: Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met ' {{InfKrt Concept |Context=ZHDSM context |prefLabel=Imagined Community |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme }}'</p> <hr /> <div><br /> {{InfKrt Concept<br /> |Context=ZHDSM context<br /> |prefLabel=Imagined Community<br /> |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=ZHDSM_Ash_Amin&diff=47573 ZHDSM Ash Amin 2017-07-14T06:47:08Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>== Ash Amin (2004) Regions unbound ==<br /> Link to {{Cite|resource=File:Amin_(2004)_Regions_Unbound.pdf|name=article|dialog=process-file-dialog}}<br /> <br /> === Summary ===<br /> <br /> === Quotes ===<br /> <br /> == Ash Amin (2010) Land of strangers ==<br /> Link to {{Cite|resource=File:Amin_(2010)_Land_of_Strangers.pdf|name=article|dialog=process-file-dialog}}<br /> <br /> === Summary ===<br /> Many people express their concerns that the twenty-first century public realm is in decline. They complain that people have shrunk away from collective life and that social bonds are decaying and need to be rebuilt. Politicians, policy-makers and theorists call for the revival of community spirit and shared identities. This is also a theme that has become an important emphasis in social policy initiatives, with a focus on enhancing integration, cohesion and interaction. Behind much of this concern, and behind many of these initiatives, is the idea that diversity, difference and pluralism is a problem, to which more community, more cohesion, more integration is the solution. <br /> <br /> Ash Amin (2010, 2012) presents an exploration of the moral and material basis of how to nurture a sense of togetherness in a society of relative strangers. He considers relations that are not reducible to local or social ties in order to offer new suggestions for living in diversity and opportunities to fabricate a different politics of the stranger. <br /> <br /> Amin proposes a politics of care. He argues that a politics of care, aware of the limitations of interpersonal proximities, might usefully turn to strategies to reinforce social interest in the shared material, virtual and affective common. It considers curatorial attention of the zones of engagement with other humans and non-humans to hold more promise for a politics of bridging difference than is an ethic of care for the stranger or for a particular notion of the community (2012, p.8). <br /> <br /> Amin triest to rethink the politics of togetherness in a society of strangers. He argues that any such politics cannot rest alone on an ethos of recognition and community. Ash Amin argues that attempts to address challenges of pluralism through policies resting on presumed ideas of community, unity and identity are problematic themselves. <br /> <br /> According to Amin collective understanding of imagined community is of critical importance for the power it pocesses to define who belongs and the terms of togetherness ( p.11). To do this requires institutional supports, embedded in material infrastructures of various sorts. <br /> <br /> === Quotes ===<br /> <br /> {{InfKrt Concept<br /> |Context=ZHDSM context<br /> |prefLabel=Ash Amin<br /> |definition=Articles by Ash Amin<br /> |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme<br /> |related=ZHDSM The encounter,<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=ZHDSM_Doreen_Massey&diff=47489 ZHDSM Doreen Massey 2017-07-11T16:30:45Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>=== Quotes ===<br /> "There is a long history of the entanglement of the conceptualisation of space and place with the framing of political positions……………...this paper concerns the '''relationship between identity and responsibility''', and the potential geographies of both." (p.5)<br /> <br /> Changing identities:<br /> <br /> "Thinking space relationally …has of course been bound up with a wider set of conceptualisations. In particular it has been bound up with a significant '''refiguring of the nature of identity'''……This is an argument which has its precise parallel in the reconceptualisation of spatial identities. An understandig of the relational nature of space has been accompanied by arguments about the relational construction of the identity of place. If space is a product of practices, trajectories, interrelations, if we make space through interactions at all levels.....These theoretical reformulations have gone alongside and been deeply entangled with '''political commitment'''." (p.5)<br /> <br /> "….rethinking identity has been a crucial theoretical complement to a politics which is suspicious of foundational essentialims; a politics which, rather than claiming 'rights' for pregiven identities based on assumptions of authenticity, argues that it is as least as important to challange the identities themselves and thus - a fortiori - the relations through which those identities have been established. " (p.5)<br /> <br /> "What I want to do in this paper is to push further this pondering over the space and times of identity and to enquire how they may be connected op with the question of '''political responsibility.'''" (p.6)<br /> <br /> The question:<br /> <br /> "If we take seriously the relational construction of identity, then it poses, first, the question of the geography of those relations of construction: the geography through which the identity (of Londen) is established and reproduced. This in turn poses the question, of what is the nature of the social and political relationships to those geographies. What is, in a relational imagination and in light of the relational construction of identity, the geography of our social and political responsibility?" (p.6) (Zie ook Gibson-Graham; beschrijven hoe die er volgens hen uit kan zien. Andere taal, andere verhalen. En emoties. Voorbij verzet komen. Ervaren ook dat het anders kan. En dat je niet hetzelfde moet zijn om community gevoel te hebben)<br /> <br /> "Such struggles over place, and the meaningfulness in and of place, return to the argument that in any even minimal recognition of the relational construction of space and identity, place must me a site of negotiation, and that often this will be conflictual negotiation." (p.7)<br /> <br /> "Indeed, the process of what they call '<nowiki/>'''resubjectivation'''' is an essential tool in J.K. Gibson-Graham's attempt to work through an active politics of place in the context of globalisation." (p.7)<br /> <br /> "One important dimension of the phenomenological position is that the meanigful relation to place is intimately bound up with the embodied nature of perception……place must be distuinguishable from simple locatedness. " (p. 8)<br /> <br /> "If space is to be really thought relationally…..then global space is no more than the sum of relations, connections, embodimentsand practices. These things are utterly everyday and grounded at the same time as the maym when linked together, go around the world. ....How can that kind of groundedness be made meaningfull across distance? This is an issue beacause, centainly in Westerns societies, there is a '''hegemonic geography of care and responsibility''' which takes the form of a nested set of Russian dolls. First there is 'home' than perhaps place and locality, than nation, and so on." (p.9)<br /> <br /> "Many reasons for that Russian doll geography…the still '''remainig impact of physical proximity'''. The persistant focus on parent-child relationships as the iconic reference point for questions of care and responsibility. There are all the rhetorics of territory, of nation and family, through which we are daily urged to construct our maps of loyalty and affect." (p.9) (Heel belangrijk dit. Andere verhalen tegenover stellen. Zie de verhalen van ouderen en slechte realties met familie. Dat is vaak, ook bij jongeren nog, een belangrijk referentiepunt)<br /> <br /> Identity and responsibility:<br /> <br /> "I believe this can be linked up with Gibson-Graham's writing in this area. Her argument is that one necessary component in the project of reimagining 'the power differential embedded in the binaries of global and local, space and place (p.29) is a reformulating of local identities. For her a central aspect of this 'resubjectivation' is an '''imaginative leap''' in which we can learn 'to think not about the world as subjected to globalization (and the global capitalist economy) but how we are subjected to the discourse of globalization and the identities (and narratives) it dictates to us." (p.10)<br /> <br /> "The work of Gibson-Graham has been '''important in articulating an argument that 'the local' too, has agency'''. She also argues, crucially, that it is important both theoretically and politically to distuinguish between various contrasting formulations of this agency." (p. 10)<br /> <br /> "Gibson-Graham….a form of re-imagination, of an alternative understanding, which she argues is an essential element in the redistribution of the potential for agency: an attempt to get out from under the position of thinking one's identity as simply 'subject to' globalisation: it is a process which goes hand in hand with inhabiting and reforming identity through engagement in '''embodied political practice.'''" (p.11)<br /> {{InfKrt Concept<br /> |Context=ZHDSM context<br /> |prefLabel=ZHDSM Doreen Massey<br /> |definition=Geographies of Responsibility (2004)<br /> |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=ZHDSM_Doreen_Massey&diff=47488 ZHDSM Doreen Massey 2017-07-11T16:28:20Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>=== Quotes ===<br /> "There is a long history of the entanglement of the conceptualisation of space and place with the framing of political positions……………...this paper concerns the '''relationship between identity and responsibility''', and the potential geographies of both." (p.5)<br /> <br /> Changing identities:<br /> <br /> "Thinking space relationally …has of course been bound up with a wider set of conceptualisations. In particular it has been bound up with a significant '''refiguring of the nature of identity'''……This is an argument which has its precise parallel in the reconceptualisation of spatial identities. An understandig of the relational nature of space has been accompanied by arguments about the relational construction of the identity of place. If space is a product of practices, trajectories, interrelations, if we make space through interactions at all levels.....These theoretical reformulations have gone alongside and been deeply entangled with '''political commitment'''." (p.5)<br /> <br /> "….rethinking identity has been a crucial theoretical complement to a politics which is suspicious of foundational essentialims; a politics which, rather than claiming 'rights' for pregiven identities based on assumptions of authenticity, argues that it is as least as important to challange the identities themselves and thus - a fortiori - the relations through which those identities have been established. " (p.5)<br /> <br /> "What I want to do in this paper is to push further this pondering over the space and times of identity and to enquire how they may be connected op with the question of '''political responsibility.'''" (p.6)<br /> <br /> The question:<br /> <br /> "If we take seriously the relational construction of identity, then it poses, first, the question of the geography of those relations of construction: the geography through which the identity (of Londen) is established and reproduced. This in turn poses the question, of what is the nature of the social and political relationships to those geographies. What is, in a relational imagination and in light of the relational construction of identity, the geography of our social and political responsibility?" (p.6) (Zie ook Gibson-Graham; beschrijven hoe die er volgens hen uit kan zien. Andere taal, andere verhalen. En emoties. Voorbij verzet komen. Ervaren ook dat het anders kan. En dat je niet hetzelfde moet zijn om community gevoel te hebben)<br /> <br /> "Such struggles over place, and the meaningfulness in and of place, return to the argument that in any even minimal recognition of the relational construction of space and identity, place must me a site of negotiation, and that often this will be conflictual negotiation." (p.7)<br /> <br /> "Indeed, the process of what they call '<nowiki/>'''resubjectivation'''' is an essential tool in J.K. Gibson-Graham's attempt to work through an active politics of place in the context of globalisation." (p.7)<br /> <br /> "One important dimension of the phenomenological position is that the meanigful relation to place is intimately bound up with the embodied nature of perception……place must be distuinguishable from simple locatedness. " (p. 8)<br /> <br /> "If space is to be really thought relationally…..then global space is no more than the sum of relations, connections, embodimentsand practices. These things are utterly everyday and grounded at the same time as the maym when linked together, go around the world. ....How can that kind of groundedness be made meaningfull across distance? This is an issue beacause, centainly in Westerns societies, there is a '''hegemonic geography of care and responsibility''' which takes the form of a nested set of Russian dolls. First there is 'home' than perhaps place and locality, than nation, and so on." (p.9)<br /> <br /> "Many reasons for that Russian doll geography…the still '''remainig impact of physical proximity'''. The persistant focus on parent-child relationships as the iconic reference point for questions of care and responsibility. There are all the rhetorics of territory, of nation and family, through which we are daily urged to construct our maps of loyalty and affect." (p.9) (Heel belangrijk dit. Andere verhalen tegenover stellen. Zie de verhalen van ouderen en slechte realties met familie. Dat is vaak, ook bij jongeren nog, een belangrijk referentiepunt)<br /> <br /> Identity and responsibility:<br /> <br /> "I believe this can be linked up with Gibson-Graham's writing in this area. Her argument is that one necessary component in the project of reimagining 'the power differential embedded in the binaries of global and local, space and place (p.29) is a reformulating of local identities. For her a central aspect of this 'resubjectivation' is an '''imaginative leap''' in which we can learn 'to think not about the world as subjected to globalization (and the global capitalist economy) but how we are subjected to the discourse of globalization and the identities (and narratives) it dictates to us." (p.10)<br /> <br /> "The work of Gibson-Graham has been '''important in articulating an argument that 'the local' too, has agency'''. She also argues, crucially, that it is important both theoretically and politically to distuinguish between various contrasting formulations of this agency." (p. 10)<br /> <br /> "Gibson-Graham….a form of re-imagination, of an alternative understanding, which she argues is an essential element in the redistribution of the potential for agency: an attempt to get out from under the position of thinking one's identity as simply 'subject to' globalisation: it is a process which goes hand in hand with inhabiting and reforming identity through engagement in '''embodied political practice.'''" (p.11)<br /> {{InfKrt Concept<br /> |Context=ZHDSM context<br /> |prefLabel=ZHDSM Joost Dessein<br /> |definition=Paleissymposium 2017<br /> |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=Overleg:ZHDSM_Doreen_Massey_(1994)_A_Global_Sense_of_Place&diff=47487 Overleg:ZHDSM Doreen Massey (1994) A Global Sense of Place 2017-07-11T16:18:41Z

<p>Petra: Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met '“A lot of what I’ve been trying to do over the all too many years when I’ve been writing about space,” she told interviewer Nigel Warburton in a 2013 Social...'</p> <hr /> <div>“A lot of what I’ve been trying to do over the all too many years when I’ve been writing about space,” she told interviewer Nigel Warburton in a 2013 Social Science Bites interview that remains one of our most popular, “is to bring space alive, to dynamize it and to make it relevant, to emphasize how important space is in the lives in which we live, and in the organization of the societies in which we live.”<br /> <br /> Massey’s academic career combined that geographer’s focus on space with an advocate’s focus on inequality and class. Early in her career she theorized about the spatial divisions of labor, which she would describe as ‘power geography.’ She debuted that class-based thesis which while working at London’s Centre for Environmental Studies, a think tank where she took her first posting after studies at Oxford and the University of Pennsylvania.<br /> <br /> In 2005 she wrapped her arms around her conceptions of space – and pleas to reinvigorate how we perceive it –for the SAGE-published For Space (three free chapters from the book are available below). In its opening lines, she wrote, “I’ve been thinking about ‘space’ for a long time. But usually I’ve come at it indirectly, through some other kind of engagement. The battles over globalization, the politics of place, the question of regional inequality, the engagements with ‘nature’ as I walk the hills, the complexities of cities. … I have become convinced both that the implicit assumptions we make about space are important and that, maybe, it could be productive to think about space differently.”</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=PR_SSM_00128&diff=47486 PR SSM 00128 2017-07-11T16:13:49Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Project SSM config}}<br /> {{Project<br /> |Supercontext=ZH Research<br /> |Project type=SSM, Standaard<br /> |Name=PhD<br /> |Start date=2017/07/4<br /> |Summary=ZH research<br /> |Show summary=Nee<br /> |Show navigation tree=Nee<br /> |Show sub projects=Ja<br /> |Show participants=Nee<br /> |Show sources=Ja<br /> |EMM access control=Access:Zeeuwse Huiskamer,<br /> }}<accesscontrol>Access:Zeeuwse Huiskamer</accesscontrol></div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=Bestand:Massey_-Global_Sense_of_Place_-_1994-.pdf&diff=47485 Bestand:Massey -Global Sense of Place - 1994-.pdf 2017-07-11T16:12:01Z

<p>Petra: Petra heeft een nieuwe versie van Bestand:Massey -Global Sense of Place - 1994-.pdf geüpload</p> <hr /> <div></div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=Bestand:Massey_-Global_Sense_of_Place_-_1994-.pdf&diff=47484 Bestand:Massey -Global Sense of Place - 1994-.pdf 2017-07-11T16:11:53Z

<p>Petra: Petra heeft een nieuwe versie van Bestand:Massey -Global Sense of Place - 1994-.pdf geüpload</p> <hr /> <div></div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=Bestand:Massey_-Global_Sense_of_Place_-_1994-.pdf&diff=47482 Bestand:Massey -Global Sense of Place - 1994-.pdf 2017-07-11T14:42:15Z

<p>Petra: Petra heeft een nieuwe versie van Bestand:Massey -Global Sense of Place - 1994-.pdf geüpload</p> <hr /> <div></div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=Bestand:Massey_-Global_Sense_of_Place_-_1994-.pdf&diff=47481 Bestand:Massey -Global Sense of Place - 1994-.pdf 2017-07-11T14:41:55Z

<p>Petra: Petra heeft een nieuwe versie van Bestand:Massey -Global Sense of Place - 1994-.pdf geüpload</p> <hr /> <div></div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=Bestand:Massey_-Global_Sense_of_Place_-_1994-.pdf&diff=47480 Bestand:Massey -Global Sense of Place - 1994-.pdf 2017-07-11T14:41:49Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div></div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=ZHDSM_Doreen_Massey&diff=47479 ZHDSM Doreen Massey 2017-07-11T14:32:25Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>=== Quotes ===<br /> "There is a long history of the entanglement of the conceptualisation of space and place with the framing of political positions……………...this paper concerns the '''relationship between identity and responsibility''', and the potential geographies of both." (p.5)<br /> <br /> Changing identities:<br /> <br /> "Thinking space relationally …has of course been bound up with a wider set of conceptualisations. In particular it has been bound up with a significant '''refiguring of the nature of identity'''……This is an argument which has its precise parallel in the reconceptualisation of spatial identities. An understandig of the relational nature of space has been accompanied by arguments about the relational construction of the identity of place. If space is a product of practices, trajectories, interrelations, if we make space through interactions at all levels.....These theoretical reformulations have gone alongside and been deeply entangled with '''political commitment'''." (p.5)<br /> <br /> "….rethinking identity has been a crucial theoretical complement to a politics which is suspicious of foundational essentialims; a politics which, rather than claiming 'rights' for pregiven identities based on assumptions of authenticity, argues that it is as least as important to challange the identities themselves and thus - a fortiori - the relations through which those identities have been established. " (p.5)<br /> <br /> "What I want to do in this paper is to push further this pondering over the space and times of identity and to enquire how they may be connected op with the question of '''political responsibility.'''" (p.6)<br /> <br /> The question:<br /> <br /> "If we take seriously the relational construction of identity, then it poses, first, the question of the geography of those relations of construction: the geography through which the identity (of Londen) is established and reproduced. This in turn poses the question, of what is the nature of the social and political relationships to those geographies. What is, in a relational imagination and in light of the relational construction of identity, the geography of our social and political responsibility?" (p.6) (Zie ook Gibson-Graham; beschrijven hoe die er volgens hen uit kan zien. Andere taal, andere verhalen. En emoties. Voorbij verzet komen. Ervaren ook dat het anders kan. En dat je niet hetzelfde moet zijn om community gevoel te hebben)<br /> <br /> "Such struggles over place, and the meaningfulness in and of place, return to the argument that in any even minimal recognition of the relational construction of space and identity, place must me a site of negotiation, and that often this will be conflictual negotiation." (p.7)<br /> <br /> "Indeed, the process of what they call '<nowiki/>'''resubjectivation'''' is an essential tool in J.K. Gibson-Graham's attempt to work through an active politics of place in the context of globalisation." (p.7)<br /> <br /> "One important dimension of the phenomenological position is that the meanigful relation to place is intimately bound up with the embodied nature of perception……place must be distuinguishable from simple locatedness. " (p. 8)<br /> <br /> "If space is to be really thought relationally…..then global space is no more than the sum of relations, connections, embodimentsand practices. These things are utterly everyday and grounded at the same time as the maym when linked together, go around the world. ....How can that kind of groundedness be made meaningfull across distance? This is an issue beacause, centainly in Westerns societies, there is a '''hegemonic geography of care and responsibility''' which takes the form of a nested set of Russian dolls. First there is 'home' than perhaps place and locality, than nation, and so on." (p.9)<br /> <br /> "Many reasons for that Russian doll geography…the still '''remainig impact of physical proximity'''. The persistant focus on parent-child relationships as the iconic reference point for questions of care and responsibility. There are all the rhetorics of territory, of nation and family, through which we are daily urged to construct our maps of loyalty and affect." (p.9) (Heel belangrijk dit. Andere verhalen tegenover stellen. Zie de verhalen van ouderen en slechte realties met familie. Dat is vaak, ook bij jongeren nog, een belangrijk referentiepunt)<br /> <br /> Identity and responsibility:<br /> <br /> "I believe this can be linked up with Gibson-Graham's writing in this area. Her argument is that one necessary component in the project of reimagining 'the power differential embedded in the binaries of global and local, space and place (p.29) is a reformulating of local identities. For her a central aspect of this 'resubjectivation' is an '''imaginative leap''' in which we can learn 'to think not about the world as subjected to globalization (and the global capitalist economy) but how we are subjected to the discourse of globalization and the identities (and narratives) it dictates to us." (p.10)<br /> <br /> "The work of Gibson-Graham has been '''important in articulating an argument that 'the local' too, has agency'''. She also argues, crucially, that it is important both theoretically and politically to distuinguish between various contrasting formulations of this agency." (p. 10)<br /> <br /> "Gibson-Graham….a form of re-imagination, of an alternative understanding, which she argues is an essential element in the redistribution of the potential for agency: an attempt to get out from under the position of thinking one's identity as simply 'subject to' globalisation: it is a process which goes hand in hand with inhabiting and reforming identity through engagement in '''embodied political practice.'''" (p.11)<br /> {{InfKrt Concept<br /> |Context=ZHDSM context<br /> |prefLabel=ZHDSM Doreen Massey<br /> |definition=Geographies of Responsibility (2004)<br /> |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=ZHDSM_Doreen_Massey&diff=47478 ZHDSM Doreen Massey 2017-07-11T14:30:18Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div><br /> === Quotes ===<br /> "There is a long history of the entanglement of the conceptualisation of space and place with the framing of political positions……………...this paper concerns the '''relationship between identity and responsibility''', and the potential geographies of both." (p.5)<br /> <br /> Changing identities:<br /> <br /> "Thinking space relationally …has of course been bound up with a wider set of conceptualisations. In particular it has been bound up with a significant '''refiguring of the nature of identity'''……This is an argument which has its precise parallel in the reconceptualisation of spatial identities. An understandig of the relational nature of space has been accompanied by arguments about the relational construction of the identity of place. If space is a product of practices, trajectories, interrelations, if we make space through interactions at all levels.....These theoretical reformulations have gone alongside and been deeply entangled with '''political commitment'''." (p.5)<br /> <br /> "….rethinking identity has been a crucial theoretical complement to a politics which is suspicious of foundational essentialims; a politics which, rather than claiming 'rights' for pregiven identities based on assumptions of authenticity, argues that it is as least as important to challange the identities themselves and thus - a fortiori - the relations through which those identities have been established. " (p.5)<br /> <br /> "What I want to do in this paper is to push further this pondering over the space and times of identity and to enquire how they may be connected op with the question of '''political responsibility.'''" (p.6)<br /> <br /> The question:<br /> <br /> "If we take seriously the relational construction of identity, then it poses, first, the question of the geography of those relations of construction: the geography through which the identity (of Londen) is established and reproduced. This in turn poses the question, of what is the nature of the social and political relationships to those geographies. What is, in a relational imagination and in light of the relational construction of identity, the geography of our social and political responsibility?" (p.6) (Zie ook Gibson-Graham; beschrijven hoe die er volgens hen uit kan zien. Andere taal, andere verhalen. En emoties. Voorbij verzet komen. Ervaren ook dat het anders kan. En dat je niet hetzelfde moet zijn om community gevoel te hebben)<br /> <br /> "Such struggles over place, and the meaningfulness in and of place, return to the argument that in any even minimal recognition of the relational construction of space and identity, place must me a site of negotiation, and that often this will be conflictual negotiation." (p.7)<br /> <br /> "Indeed, the process of what they call '<nowiki/>'''resubjectivation'''' is an essential tool in J.K. Gibson-Graham's attempt to work through an active politics of place in the context of globalisation." (p.7)<br /> <br /> "One important dimension of the phenomenological position is that the meanigful relation to place is intimately bound up with the embodied nature of perception……place must be distuinguishable from simple locatedness. " (p. 8)<br /> <br /> "If space is to be really thought relationally…..then global space is no more than the sum of relations, connections, embodimentsand practices. These things are utterly everyday and grounded at the same time as the maym when linked together, go around the world. ....How can that kind of groundedness be made meaningfull across distance? This is an issue beacause, centainly in Westerns societies, there is a '''hegemonic geography of care and responsibility''' which takes the form of a nested set of Russian dolls. First there is 'home' than perhaps place and locality, than nation, and so on." (p.9)<br /> <br /> "Many reasons for that Russian doll geography…the still '''remainig impact of physical proximity'''. The persistant focus on parent-child relationships as the iconic reference point for questions of care and responsibility. There are all the rhetorics of territory, of nation and family, through which we are daily urged to construct our maps of loyalty and affect." (p.9) (Heel belangrijk dit. Andere verhalen tegenover stellen. Zie de verhalen van ouderen en slechte realties met familie. Dat is vaak, ook bij jongeren nog, een belangrijk referentiepunt)<br /> <br /> Identity and responsibility:<br /> <br /> "I believe this can be linked up with Gibson-Graham's writing in this area. Her argument is that one necessary component in the project of reimagining 'the power differential embedded in the binaries of global and local, space and place (p.29) is a reformulating of local identities. For her a central aspect of this 'resubjectivation' is an '''imaginative leap''' in which we can learn 'to think not about the world as subjected to globalization (and the global capitalist economy) but how we are subjected to the discourse of globalization and the identities (and narratives) it dictates to us." (p.10)<br /> <br /> "The work of Gibson-Graham has been '''important in articulating an argument that 'the local' too, has agency'''. She also argues, crucially, that it is important both theoretically and politically to distuinguish between various contrasting formulations of this agency." (p. 10)<br /> <br /> "Gibson-Graham….a form of re-imagination, of an alternative understanding, which she argues is an essential element in the redistribution of the potential for agency: an attempt to get out from under the position of thinking one's identity as simply 'subject to' globalisation: it is a process which goes hand in hand with inhabiting and reforming identity through engagement in '''embodied political practice.'''" (p.11){{InfKrt Concept<br /> |Context=ZHDSM context<br /> |prefLabel=Doreen Massey<br /> |definition=Geographies of Responsibility (2004)<br /> |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=ZHDSM_Doreen_Massey&diff=47475 ZHDSM Doreen Massey 2017-07-11T14:13:29Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div><br /> {{InfKrt Concept<br /> |Context=ZHDSM context<br /> |prefLabel=Doreen Massey<br /> |definition=Geographies of Responsibility (2004)<br /> |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=ZHDSM_Doreen_Massey_(1994)_A_Global_Sense_of_Place&diff=47474 ZHDSM Doreen Massey (1994) A Global Sense of Place 2017-07-11T14:11:58Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>=== Quotes ===<br /> "One of the results of this (a new phase of internationalization / speed up / time-space compression) is an '''increasing uncertainty about what we mean by 'places' and how we relate to them'''." (p.1) <br /> <br /> "An (idealized) notion of an era when places were (supposedly) inhabited by coherent and homogeneous communities is set against a look that refers to fragmentation and disruption. According to Massey The counterposition is anyway dubious, of course; 'place' and 'community' have only rarely been coterminous. One of the '''effects''' of such responses is that place itself, the seeking after a sense of place, has come to be seen by some as '''necessarily reactionary'''." (p.1)<br /> <br /> "But is that necessarily so? Can't we rethink out sense of place? Is it not possible for a sense of place to be progressive; not self-closing and defensive, but outward-looking? A sense of place which is adequate to this era?" (p.1)<br /> <br /> "How, in the context of all these socially varied time-space changes do we think about 'places'? "<br /> <br /> Een vraag die hiermee samenhangt is: "'''how then do we think about 'locality'''<nowiki/>'?" (p.4). Zie ook Gibson Graham<br /> <br /> "We need therefore to think through what might be '''an adequately progressive sense of place''', one which would fit in with the current global-local times and the feelings and relations they give rise to, and '''which would be useful in what are, after all, political struggles often inevitably based on place'''. The question is how to hold on to that notion of geographical difference, of uniqueness, even of rootedness if people want that, '''without being reactionary'''." (p.5)<br /> <br /> "If it is now recognized that people have multiple identities then the same point can me made in relation to places. Moreover, such multiple identities can either be a source of richness or a source of conflict, or both." (p.5) <br /> <br /> "One of the '''problems''' identified here seems to be a '''persistant identification of place with 'community'''<nowiki/>'. Yet it is a misidentification. p.6 Misplaatste zoektocht naar sociale cohesie. Om dat tegen te gaan werken met het concept care." <br /> <br /> For what is happening is that the geography of social relations is changing. In many cases such relations are increasingly stretched out over space. Amin zegt hierover: <br /> <br /> "It is from that perspective that is it '''possible to envisage an alternative interpretation of place." (p'''.6)<br /> <br /> "There seems to be….a number of ways in which a progressive concept of place might be developed. First of all it is absolutely not static. If places can be conceptualized in terms of the social relations in which they tie together, then it is also the case that these interactions themselves are not motionless things, frozen in time. '''They are processes'''." (p.8) <br /> <br /> "Second, they do not have boundarys….Do not have single unique identities; they are full of internal conflicts……'''none of this denies place nor the importance of the uniqueness of place'''. The specificity of place in continualy reproduced. ….There is the specificity of place which derives from the fact that each place is the focus of '''a distinct mixture of wider and more local social relations'''. There is the fact that this very mixture together in one place may produce effects which would not have happened otherwise... that history itself imagined as a layer upon layer of different sets of linkages, both local and to the wider world. " (p.8)<br /> {{InfKrt Concept<br /> |Context=ZHDSM context<br /> |prefLabel=Doreen Massey<br /> |definition=A Global Sense of Place (1994). From Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.<br /> |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=ZHDSM_Doreen_Massey&diff=47473 ZHDSM Doreen Massey 2017-07-11T14:07:20Z

<p>Petra: Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met ' {{InfKrt Concept |Context=ZHDSM context |prefLabel=Doreen Massey |definition=Geographies of Responsability (2004) |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme }}'</p> <hr /> <div><br /> {{InfKrt Concept<br /> |Context=ZHDSM context<br /> |prefLabel=Doreen Massey<br /> |definition=Geographies of Responsability (2004)<br /> |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=ZHDSM_Doreen_Massey_(1994)_A_Global_Sense_of_Place&diff=47472 ZHDSM Doreen Massey (1994) A Global Sense of Place 2017-07-11T14:03:09Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>=== Quotes ===<br /> "One of the results of this (a new phase of internationalization / speed up / time-space compression) is an '''increasing uncertainty about what we mean by 'places' and how we relate to them'''." (p.1) <br /> <br /> "An (idealized) notion of an era when places were (supposedly) inhabited by coherent and homogeneous communities is set against a look that refers to fragmentation and disruption. According to Massey The counterposition is anyway dubious, of course; 'place' and 'community' have only rarely been coterminous. One of the '''effects''' of such responses is that place itself, the seeking after a sense of place, has come to be seen by some as '''necessarily reactionary'''." (p.1)<br /> <br /> "But is that necessarily so? Can't we rethink out sense of place? Is it not possible for a sense of place to be progressive; not self-closing and defensive, but outward-looking? A sense of place which is adequate to this era?" (p.1)<br /> <br /> "How, in the context of all these socially varied time-space changes do we think about 'places'? "<br /> <br /> Een vraag die hiermee samenhangt is: "'''how then do we think about 'locality'''<nowiki/>'?" (p.4). Zie ook Gibson Graham<br /> <br /> "We need therefore to think through what might be '''an adequately progressive sense of place''', one which would fit in with the current global-local times and the feelings and relations they give rise to, and '''which would be useful in what are, after all, political struggles often inevitably based on place'''. The question is how to hold on to that notion of geographical difference, of uniqueness, even of rootedness if people want that, '''without being reactionary'''." (p.5)<br /> <br /> "If it is now recognized that people have multiple identities then the same point can me made in relation to places. Moreover, such multiple identities can either be a source of richness or a source of conflict, or both." (p.5) <br /> <br /> "One of the '''problems''' identified here seems to be a '''persistant identification of place with 'community'''<nowiki/>'. Yet it is a misidentification. p.6 Misplaatste zoektocht naar sociale cohesie. Om dat tegen te gaan werken met het concept care." <br /> <br /> For what is happening is that the geography of social relations is changing. In many cases such relations are increasingly stretched out over space. Amin zegt hierover: <br /> <br /> "It is from that perspective that is it '''possible to envisage an alternative interpretation of place." (p'''.6)<br /> <br /> "There seems to be….a number of ways in which a progressive concept of place might be developed. First of all it is absolutely not static. If places can be conceptualized in terms of the social relations in which they tie together, then it is also the case that these interactions themselves are not motionless things, frozen in time. '''They are processes'''." (p.8) <br /> <br /> "Second, they do not have boundarys….Do not have single unique identities; they are full of internal conflicts……'''none of this denies place nor the importance of the uniqueness of place'''. The specificity of place in continualy reproduced. ….There is the specificity of place which derives from the fact that each place is the focus of '''a distinct mixture of wider and more local social relations'''. There is the fact that this very mixture together in one place may produce effects which would not have happened otherwise... that history itself imagined as a layer upon layer of different sets of linkages, both local and to the wider world. " (p.8)<br /> {{InfKrt Concept<br /> |Context=ZHDSM context<br /> |prefLabel=Doreen Massey<br /> |definition=A Global Sense of Place (1994). From Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.<br /> |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme<br /> }}<br /> {{Related<br /> |related=ZHDSM Doreen Massey (1994) A Global Sense of Place<br /> |name=Geographies of Responsability (2004)<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=ZHDSM_Doreen_Massey_(1994)_A_Global_Sense_of_Place&diff=47470 ZHDSM Doreen Massey (1994) A Global Sense of Place 2017-07-11T13:47:32Z

<p>Petra: </p> <hr /> <div>=== Quotes ===<br /> "One of the results of this (a new phase of internationalization / speed up / time-space compression) is an '''increasing uncertainty about what we mean by 'places' and how we relate to them'''." (p.1) <br /> <br /> "An (idealized) notion of an era when places were (supposedly) inhabited by coherent and homogeneous communities is set against a look that refers to fragmentation and disruption. According to Massey The counterposition is anyway dubious, of course; 'place' and 'community' have only rarely been coterminous. One of the '''effects''' of such responses is that place itself, the seeking after a sense of place, has come to be seen by some as '''necessarily reactionary'''." (p.1)<br /> <br /> "But is that necessarily so? Can't we rethink out sense of place? Is it not possible for a sense of place to be progressive; not self-closing and defensive, but outward-looking? A sense of place which is adequate to this era?" (p.1)<br /> <br /> "How, in the context of all these socially varied time-space changes do we think about 'places'? "<br /> <br /> Een vraag die hiermee samenhangt is: "'''how then do we think about 'locality'''<nowiki/>'?" (p.4). Zie ook Gibson Graham<br /> <br /> "We need therefore to think through what might be '''an adequately progressive sense of place''', one which would fit in with the current global-local times and the feelings and relations they give rise to, and '''which would be useful in what are, after all, political struggles often inevitably based on place'''. The question is how to hold on to that notion of geographical difference, of uniqueness, even of rootedness if people want that, '''without being reactionary'''." (p.5)<br /> <br /> "If it is now recognized that people have multiple identities then the same point can me made in relation to places. Moreover, such multiple identities can either be a source of richness or a source of conflict, or both." (p.5) <br /> <br /> "One of the '''problems''' identified here seems to be a '''persistant identification of place with 'community'''<nowiki/>'. Yet it is a misidentification. p.6 Misplaatste zoektocht naar sociale cohesie. Om dat tegen te gaan werken met het concept care." <br /> <br /> For what is happening is that the geography of social relations is changing. In many cases such relations are increasingly stretched out over space. Amin zegt hierover: <br /> <br /> "It is from that perspective that is it '''possible to envisage an alternative interpretation of place." (p'''.6)<br /> <br /> "There seems to be….a number of ways in which a progressive concept of place might be developed. First of all it is absolutely not static. If places can be conceptualized in terms of the social relations in which they tie together, then it is also the case that these interactions themselves are not motionless things, frozen in time. '''They are processes'''." (p.8) <br /> <br /> "Second, they do not have boundarys….Do not have single unique identities; they are full of internal conflicts……'''none of this denies place nor the importance of the uniqueness of place'''. The specificity of place in continualy reproduced. ….There is the specificity of place which derives from the fact that each place is the focus of '''a distinct mixture of wider and more local social relations'''. There is the fact that this very mixture together in one place may produce effects which would not have happened otherwise... that history itself imagined as a layer upon layer of different sets of linkages, both local and to the wider world. " (p.8){{InfKrt Concept<br /> |Context=ZHDSM context<br /> |prefLabel=Doreen Massey<br /> |definition=A Global Sense of Place (1994). From Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.<br /> |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=ZHDSM_Doreen_Massey_(1994)_A_Global_Sense_of_Place&diff=47466 ZHDSM Doreen Massey (1994) A Global Sense of Place 2017-07-11T12:53:54Z

<p>Petra: Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met ' {{InfKrt Concept |Context=ZHDSM context |prefLabel=Doreen Massey |definition=A Global Sense of Place (1994). From Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis: University...'</p> <hr /> <div><br /> {{InfKrt Concept<br /> |Context=ZHDSM context<br /> |prefLabel=Doreen Massey<br /> |definition=A Global Sense of Place (1994). From Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.<br /> |inScheme=ZHDSM scheme<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=LC_00776&diff=47443 LC 00776 2017-07-11T09:43:19Z

<p>Petra: Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met '''Op deze pagina beschrijf je de '''resultaten''' en inzichten uit jouw '''project''' of '''onderzoek'''.'' ''NB: deze pagina kun je naar eigen inzicht en voorkeu...'</p> <hr /> <div>''Op deze pagina beschrijf je de '''resultaten''' en inzichten uit jouw '''project''' of '''onderzoek'''.'' <br /> <br /> ''NB: deze pagina kun je naar eigen inzicht en voorkeur (anders) indelen, wijzigen en opmaken.''<br /> <br /> <br /> == Projectresultaten ==<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanleiding en analyse ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Ontwerp en specificatie ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst - inclusief eventuele resultaten uit verdiepend onderzoek''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Resultaten van de realisatie, toepassing en beheer ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Resultaten van de monitoring, toetsing en evaluatie ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> == Onderzoeksresultaten ==<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanleiding, theoretisch kader en onderzoeksvragen ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Onderzoeksopstelling, materialen en methoden ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Resultaten en toepassing ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Conclusies ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanbevelingen en lessons learned ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> {{Light Context<br /> |Supercontext=PR 00146<br /> |Topcontext=PR SSM 00128<br /> |Toppage=Content<br /> |Sequence number=2<br /> |Context type=Situation<br /> |Heading=Case Study 2 - resultaten<br /> |Show referred by=Nee<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=LC_00273&diff=43455 LC 00273 2017-03-20T09:50:33Z

<p>Petra: Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met '''Op deze pagina beschrijf je de '''resultaten''' en inzichten uit jouw '''project''' of '''onderzoek'''.'' ''NB: deze pagina kun je naar eigen inzicht en voorkeu...'</p> <hr /> <div>''Op deze pagina beschrijf je de '''resultaten''' en inzichten uit jouw '''project''' of '''onderzoek'''.'' <br /> <br /> ''NB: deze pagina kun je naar eigen inzicht en voorkeur (anders) indelen, wijzigen en opmaken.''<br /> <br /> <br /> == Projectresultaten ==<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanleiding en analyse ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Ontwerp en specificatie ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst - inclusief eventuele resultaten uit verdiepend onderzoek''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Resultaten van de realisatie, toepassing en beheer ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Resultaten van de monitoring, toetsing en evaluatie ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> == Onderzoeksresultaten ==<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanleiding, theoretisch kader en onderzoeksvragen ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Onderzoeksopstelling, materialen en methoden ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Resultaten en toepassing ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Conclusies ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanbevelingen en lessons learned ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> {{Light Context<br /> |Supercontext=SiR Duurzame gemeentelijke organisatie<br /> |Topcontext=SiR Duurzame gemeentelijke organisatie<br /> |Toppage=Content<br /> |Sequence number=2<br /> |Context type=Situation<br /> |Heading=Route 05: Duurzame gemeentelijke organisatie - resultaten<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=LC_00272&diff=43454 LC 00272 2017-03-20T09:50:25Z

<p>Petra: Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met '''Op deze pagina beschrijf je - als in een logboek - hoe je jouw '''project of onderzoek''' hebt '''aangepakt''' (wat en wanneer je dat met wie hebt gedaan).'' ''N...'</p> <hr /> <div>''Op deze pagina beschrijf je - als in een logboek - hoe je jouw '''project of onderzoek''' hebt '''aangepakt''' (wat en wanneer je dat met wie hebt gedaan).''<br /> <br /> ''NB: deze pagina kun je naar eigen inzicht en voorkeur (anders) indelen, wijzigen en opmaken.''<br /> <br /> <br /> == Projectlogboek ==<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het initiëren en sturen ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het ontwerpen en specificeren ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst - inclusief eventuele resultaten uit verdiepend onderzoek''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het realiseren, toepassen en beheren ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van de monitoring, toetsing en evalueren ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> == Onderzoekslogboek ==<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van de retrospectie, theoretische analyse en het verkrijgen van de onderzoeksvragen ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het opstellen van het onderzoeksplan ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het verzamelen van de resultaten en de toepassing ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het trekken van conclusies ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het destilleren van aanbevelingen en lessons learned ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> {{Light Context<br /> |Supercontext=SiR Duurzame gemeentelijke organisatie<br /> |Topcontext=SiR Duurzame gemeentelijke organisatie<br /> |Toppage=Process<br /> |Sequence number=1<br /> |Context type=Situation<br /> |Heading=Route 05: Duurzame gemeentelijke organisatie - aanpak<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=LC_00271&diff=43453 LC 00271 2017-03-20T09:44:18Z

<p>Petra: Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met '''Op deze pagina beschrijf je de '''resultaten''' en inzichten uit jouw '''project''' of '''onderzoek'''.'' ''NB: deze pagina kun je naar eigen inzicht en voorkeu...'</p> <hr /> <div>''Op deze pagina beschrijf je de '''resultaten''' en inzichten uit jouw '''project''' of '''onderzoek'''.'' <br /> <br /> ''NB: deze pagina kun je naar eigen inzicht en voorkeur (anders) indelen, wijzigen en opmaken.''<br /> <br /> <br /> == Projectresultaten ==<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanleiding en analyse ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Ontwerp en specificatie ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst - inclusief eventuele resultaten uit verdiepend onderzoek''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Resultaten van de realisatie, toepassing en beheer ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Resultaten van de monitoring, toetsing en evaluatie ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> == Onderzoeksresultaten ==<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanleiding, theoretisch kader en onderzoeksvragen ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Onderzoeksopstelling, materialen en methoden ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Resultaten en toepassing ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Conclusies ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanbevelingen en lessons learned ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> {{Light Context<br /> |Supercontext=SiR Duurzame recreatie<br /> |Topcontext=SiR Duurzame recreatie<br /> |Toppage=Content<br /> |Sequence number=2<br /> |Context type=Situation<br /> |Heading=Route 03: Duurzame recreatie<br /> }}</div>

Petra https://gofreshwiki.nl/wiki/index.php?title=LC_00270&diff=43452 LC 00270 2017-03-20T09:44:08Z

<p>Petra: Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met '''Op deze pagina beschrijf je - als in een logboek - hoe je jouw '''project of onderzoek''' hebt '''aangepakt''' (wat en wanneer je dat met wie hebt gedaan).'' ''N...'</p> <hr /> <div>''Op deze pagina beschrijf je - als in een logboek - hoe je jouw '''project of onderzoek''' hebt '''aangepakt''' (wat en wanneer je dat met wie hebt gedaan).''<br /> <br /> ''NB: deze pagina kun je naar eigen inzicht en voorkeur (anders) indelen, wijzigen en opmaken.''<br /> <br /> <br /> == Projectlogboek ==<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het initiëren en sturen ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het ontwerpen en specificeren ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst - inclusief eventuele resultaten uit verdiepend onderzoek''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het realiseren, toepassen en beheren ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van de monitoring, toetsing en evalueren ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> == Onderzoekslogboek ==<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van de retrospectie, theoretische analyse en het verkrijgen van de onderzoeksvragen ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het opstellen van het onderzoeksplan ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het verzamelen van de resultaten en de toepassing ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het trekken van conclusies ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> <br /> <br /> === Aanpak van het destilleren van aanbevelingen en lessons learned ===<br /> ''Hier jouw tekst''<br /> {{Light Context<br /> |Supercontext=SiR Duurzame recreatie<br /> |Topcontext=SiR Duurzame recreatie<br /> |Toppage=Process<br /> |Sequence number=1<br /> |Context type=Situation<br /> |Heading=Route 03: Duurzame recreatie<br /> }}</div>

Petra