GO-FRESH - Gebruikersbijdragen [nl]

LC 00885

2018-08-29T14:30:59Z

Mireille martens:

=== Start project ===
[[Bestand:Town hall.jpg|miniatuur|Visitors at the meeting during the poster presentation.]]
On the first of February 2018, the project started to map different alternative designs based on previous studies and outcomes of new studies. Two researchers of the Building with Nature group of HZ coordinated this research and guided the involved students. The expertise of researchers of water safety and spatial planning, civil engineering and vitality and tourism was added. A stakeholder meeting was organised the 14th of June in the former town hall of Middelburg to share the outcomes of the first six months and to organize discussion about the different alternative designs.
==== Ecosystem services ====
Groups of students compared the alternative designs for ecosystem services ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Infographic ESS schorrepolder versie 4 nederlands ESS.pdf|name=click for infographic|dialog=process-file-dialog}}):
# Sustainable use of abiotic resources ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Abiotic resources.pdf|name=Sinke et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
# Use as a nursery for fish ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Nursery for Fish.pdf|name=Lee et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
# Provision of habitat and foraging area for birds ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Bird Foraging Habitat Schorerpolder.pdf|name=Burger et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
# Enhance the biodiversity of hard structures in the intertidal zone of the area ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Hard substrate biodiversity.pdf|name=Metekohij et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
# Quantification of primary production and carbon dioxide sequestration {{Cite|resource=Bestand:Poster CO2 student 2018.pptx|name=(Mol et al. 2018)|dialog=process-file-dialog}}
# Quantification of the water purification capacity of salt marshes ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Water purification capacity.pdf|name=Correa et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
# Possibilities for aquaculture (Abbenis, 2018)
# Opportunities for experiencing nature and tourism ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Welbeing in delta's.jpg|name=Kruizinga 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
==== Limits and opportunities ====
The possibilities for Schorerpolder are limited because of its location, what is to be found below and above the surface and where it is currently used for. The layer approach was used to define the spatial impact of the area. The most important outcome of the research was the amount of cables and tubes that where present in the area, all of importance to the harbor (Lambregts, 2018).
[[Bestand:4 alternative designs.jpg|miniatuur|Figure 1: Four alternative designs for Schorerpolder.|772x772px]]
==== Designs ====
The four different designs of Schorerpolder, were assessed based on the ecosystem services and expenses on creation and maintenance.
* '''Open connection''': Opening up the polder completely would allow for natural processes that make intertidal areas so unique to shape and form the area. By letting these tides flow through the area unhindered the potential intertidal area is maximized which is beneficial for wading birds but downside is that all dikes would have to be overhauled.
* '''Controlled tide''': This design needs less changes in the primary dike than the previous one and is beneficial as fish nursery (e.g. eel) because of the presence of a gully and denitrification can occur in anaerobic environments. In addition salt marshes can develop more easily and can store CO2.
* '''Separated functions''': This design is expensive as a new dam will be built to separate the harbor from the new intertidal area. Still this leads to opportunities for biodiversity on dams and dikes. The high sedimentation rate will lead to phosphorus burial and options to use the sediment as abiotic resource.
* '''Combined perspectives''': By combining low costs and maximizing ecosystem services, the fourth design was born. In addition this design makes aquaculture possible.
==== Conclusion ====
The interactive meeting showed that the majority of the stakeholders were in favor of designs controlled tide and combined perspectives. Further research needs to be done on CO2 reduction capacity of salt marshes.
{{Light Context
|Supercontext=PR 00190
|Topcontext=PR 00190
|Toppage=Other
|Sequence number=1
|Context type=Situation
|Heading=Orientation phase Schorerpolder
|Summary=Hier volgen de resultaten van de eerste ontwikkelingsfase van het project Schorerpolder.
|Show referred by=Ja
|Referred by text=Hier wordt aan gewerkt of naar verwezen door:
}}

Bestand:Infographic ESS schorrepolder versie 4 nederlands ESS.pdf

2018-08-29T14:30:42Z

Mireille martens:

{{Resource Light config}}
{{Resource Description
|file name=infographic_ESS_schorrepolder_versie 4 nederlands ESS.pdf
|created in page=LC 00885
|title=Infographic
|creator=Martens, M.
|date=2018-08-29
}}

Bestand:Infographic ESS schorrepolder versie 4 nederlands ESS.pdf

2018-08-29T14:30:39Z

Mireille martens:

Bestand:Town hall.jpg

2018-08-29T14:22:49Z

Mireille martens:

Visitors of the meeting during the poster presentations.

LC 00885

2018-08-29T14:05:40Z

Mireille martens:

=== Start project ===
On the first of February 2018, the project started to map different alternative designs based on previous studies and outcomes of new studies. Two researchers of the Building with Nature group of HZ coordinated this research and guided the involved students. The expertise of researchers of water safety and spatial planning, civil engineering and vitality and tourism was added. A stakeholder meeting was organised the 14th of June to share the outcomes of the first six months and to organize discussion about the different alternative designs.
==== Ecosystem services ====
Groups of students compared the alternative designs for ecosystem services:
# Sustainable use of abiotic resources ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Abiotic resources.pdf|name=Sinke et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
# Use as a nursery for fish ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Nursery for Fish.pdf|name=Lee et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
# Provision of habitat and foraging area for birds ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Bird Foraging Habitat Schorerpolder.pdf|name=Burger et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
# Enhance the biodiversity of hard structures in the intertidal zone of the area ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Hard substrate biodiversity.pdf|name=Metekohij et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
# Quantification of primary production and carbon dioxide sequestration {{Cite|resource=Bestand:Poster CO2 student 2018.pptx|name=(Mol et al. 2018)|dialog=process-file-dialog}}
# Quantification of the water purification capacity of salt marshes ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Water purification capacity.pdf|name=Correa et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
# Possibilities for aquaculture (Abbenis, 2018)
# Opportunities for experiencing nature and tourism ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Welbeing in delta's.jpg|name=Kruizinga 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
==== Limits and opportunities ====
The possibilities for Schorerpolder are limited because of its location, what is to be found below and above the surface and where it is currently used for. The layer approach was used to define the spatial impact of the area. The most important outcome of the research was the amount of cables and tubes that where present in the area, all of importance to the harbor (Lambregts, 2018).
[[Bestand:4 alternative designs.jpg|miniatuur|Figure 1: Four alternative designs for Schorerpolder.|772x772px]]
==== Designs ====
The four different designs of Schorerpolder, were assessed based on the ecosystem services and expenses on creation and maintenance.
* '''Open connection''': Opening up the polder completely would allow for natural processes that make intertidal areas so unique to shape and form the area. By letting these tides flow through the area unhindered the potential intertidal area is maximized which is beneficial for wading birds but downside is that all dikes would have to be overhauled.
* '''Controlled tide''': This design needs less changes in the primary dike than the previous one and is beneficial as fish nursery (e.g. eel) because of the presence of a gully and denitrification can occur in anaerobic environments. In addition salt marshes can develop more easily and can store CO2.
* '''Separated functions''': This design is expensive as a new dam will be built to separate the harbor from the new intertidal area. Still this leads to opportunities for biodiversity on dams and dikes. The high sedimentation rate will lead to phosphorus burial and options to use the sediment as abiotic resource.
* '''Combined perspectives''': By combining low costs and maximizing ecosystem services, the fourth design was born. In addition this design makes aquaculture possible.
==== Conclusion ====
The interactive meeting showed that the majority of the stakeholders were in favor of designs controlled tide and combined perspectives. Further research needs to be done on CO2 reduction capacity of salt marshes.
{{Light Context
|Supercontext=PR 00190
|Topcontext=PR 00190
|Toppage=Other
|Sequence number=1
|Context type=Situation
|Heading=Orientation phase Schorerpolder
|Summary=Hier volgen de resultaten van de eerste ontwikkelingsfase van het project Schorerpolder.
|Show referred by=Ja
|Referred by text=Hier wordt aan gewerkt of naar verwezen door:
}}

LC 00885

2018-08-07T10:31:48Z

Mireille martens:

=== Start project ===
On the first of February 2018, the project started to map different alternative designs based on previous studies and outcomes of new studies. Two researchers of the Building with Nature group of HZ coordinated this research and guided the involved students. The expertise of researchers of water safety and spatial planning, civil engineering and vitality and tourism was added. A stakeholder meeting was organised the 14th of June to share the outcomes of the first six months and to organize discussion about the different alternative designs.
==== Ecosystem services ====
Groups of students compared the alternative designs for ecosystem services
1. Sustainable use of abiotic resources ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Abiotic resources.pdf|name=Sinke et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
2. Use as a nursery for fish ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Nursery for Fish.pdf|name=Lee et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
3. Provision of habitat and foraging area for birds ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Bird Foraging Habitat Schorerpolder.pdf|name=Burger et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
4. Enhance the biodiversity of hard structures in the intertidal zone of the area ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Hard substrate biodiversity.pdf|name=Metekohij et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
5. Quantification of primary production and carbon dioxide sequestration {{Cite|resource=Bestand:Poster CO2 student 2018.pptx|name=(Mol et al. 2018)|dialog=process-file-dialog}}
6. Quantification of the water purification capacity of salt marshes ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Water purification capacity.pdf|name=Correa et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
7. Possibilities for aquaculture (Abbenis, 2018)
8. Opportunities for experiencing nature and tourism ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Welbeing in delta's.jpg|name=Kruizinga et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
==== Limits and opportunities ====
The possibilities for Schorerpolder are limited because of its location, what is to be found below and above the surface and where it is currently used for. The layer approach was used to define the spatial impact of the area. The most important outcome of the research was the amount of cables and tubes that where present in the area, all of importance to the harbor (Lambregts, 2018).
[[Bestand:4 alternative designs.jpg|miniatuur|Four alternative designs for Schorerpolder.]]
==== Designs ====
The four different designs of Schorerpolder, were assessed based on the ecosystem services and expenses on creation and maintenance.
Open connection: Opening up the polder completely would allow for natural processes that make intertidal areas so unique to shape and form the area. By letting these tides flow through the area unhindered the potential intertidal area is maximized which is beneficial for wading birds but downside is that all dikes would have to be overhauled.
Controlled tide: This design needs less changes in the primary dike than the previous one and is beneficial as fish nursery (e.g. eel) because of the presence of a gully and denitrification can occur in anaerobic environments. In addition salt marshes can develop more easily and can store CO2.
Separated functions: This design is expensive as a new dam will be build to separate the harbor from the new intertidal area. Still this leads to opportunities for biodiversity on dams and dikes. The high sedimentation rate will lead to phosphorus burial and options to use the sediment as abiotic resource.
Combined perspectives: By combining low costs and maximizing ecosystem services, the fourth design was born. In addition this design makes aquaculture possible.
==== Conclusion ====
The interactive meeting showed that the majority of the stakeholders were in favor of designs controlled tide and combined perspectives. Further research needs to be done on CO2 reduction capacity of salt marshes.
{{Light Context
|Supercontext=PR 00190
|Topcontext=PR 00190
|Toppage=Other
|Sequence number=1
|Context type=Situation
|Heading=Eerste deel oriënteringsfase Schorerpolder
|Summary=Hier volgen de resultaten van de eerste ontwikkelingsfase van het project Schorerpolder.
|Show referred by=Ja
|Referred by text=Hier wordt aan gewerkt of naar verwezen door:
}}

LC 00885

2018-08-06T13:32:08Z

Mireille martens:

=== Start project ===
On the first of February 2018, the project started to map different alternative designs based on previous studies and outcomes of new studies. Two researchers of the Building with Nature group of HZ coordinated this research and guided the involved students. The expertise of researchers of water safety and spatial planning, civil engineering and vitality and tourism was added. A stakeholder meeting was organised the 14th of June to share the outcomes of the first six months and to organize discussion about the different alternative designs.
==== Ecosystem services ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Infographic ESS Schorerpolder 3.JPG|name=artist impression|dialog=process-file-dialog}}) ====
Groups of students compared the alternative designs for ecosystem services
1. Sustainable use of abiotic resources ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Abiotic resources.pdf|name=Sinke et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
2. Use as a nursery for fish ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Nursery for Fish.pdf|name=Lee et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
3. Provision of habitat and foraging area for birds ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Bird Foraging Habitat Schorerpolder.pdf|name=Burger et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
4. Enhance the biodiversity of hard structures in the intertidal zone of the area ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Hard substrate biodiversity.pdf|name=Metekohij et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
5. Quantification of primary production and carbon dioxide sequestration {{Cite|resource=Bestand:Poster CO2 student 2018.pptx|name=(Mol et al. 2018)|dialog=process-file-dialog}}
6. Quantification of the water purification capacity of salt marshes ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Water purification capacity.pdf|name=Correa et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
7. Possibilities for aquaculture (Abbenis, 2018)
8. Opportunities for experiencing nature and tourism ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Welbeing in delta's.jpg|name=Kruizinga et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
==== Limits and opportunities ====
The possibilities for Schorerpolder are limited because of its location, what is to be found below and above the surface and where it is currently used for. The layer approach was used to define the spatial impact of the area. The most important outcome of the research was the amount of cables and tubes that where present in the area, all of importance to the harbor (Lambregts, 2018).
[[Bestand:4 alternative designs.jpg|miniatuur|Four alternative designs for Schorerpolder.]]
==== Designs ====
The four different designs of Schorerpolder, were assessed based on the ecosystem services and expenses on creation and maintenance.
Open connection: Opening up the polder completely would allow for natural processes that make intertidal areas so unique to shape and form the area. By letting these tides flow through the area unhindered the potential intertidal area is maximized which is beneficial for wading birds but downside is that all dikes would have to be overhauled.
Controlled tide: This design needs less changes in the primary dike than the previous one and is beneficial as fish nursery (e.g. eel) because of the presence of a gully and denitrification can occur in anaerobic environments. In addition salt marshes can develop more easily and can store CO2.
Separated functions: This design is expensive as a new dam will be build to separate the harbor from the new intertidal area. Still this leads to opportunities for biodiversity on dams and dikes. The high sedimentation rate will lead to phosphorus burial and options to use the sediment as abiotic resource.
Combined perspectives: By combining low costs and maximizing ecosystem services, the fourth design was born. In addition this design makes aquaculture possible.
==== Conclusion ====
The interactive meeting showed that the majority of the stakeholders were in favor of designs controlled tide and combined perspectives. Further research needs to be done on CO2 reduction capacity of salt marshes.
{{Light Context
|Supercontext=PR 00190
|Topcontext=PR 00190
|Toppage=Other
|Sequence number=1
|Context type=Situation
|Heading=Eerste deel oriënteringsfase Schorerpolder
|Summary=Hier volgen de resultaten van de eerste ontwikkelingsfase van het project Schorerpolder.
|Show referred by=Ja
|Referred by text=Hier wordt aan gewerkt of naar verwezen door:
}}

Bestand:Welbeing in delta's.jpg

2018-08-06T13:31:55Z

Mireille martens:

{{Resource Light config}}
{{Resource Description
|file name=Welbeing in delta's.jpg
|created in page=LC 00885
|title=Wellbeing in delta's
|creator=Peter Kruizinga
|date=2018-06-14
}}

Bestand:Welbeing in delta's.jpg

2018-08-06T13:31:53Z

Mireille martens:

LC 00885

2018-08-06T13:21:15Z

Mireille martens:

=== Start project ===
On the first of February 2018, the project started to map different alternative designs based on previous studies and outcomes of new studies. Two researchers of the Building with Nature group of HZ coordinated this research and guided the involved students. The expertise of researchers of water safety and spatial planning, civil engineering and vitality and tourism was added. A stakeholder meeting was organised the 14th of June to share the outcomes of the first six months and to organize discussion about the different alternative designs.
==== Ecosystem services ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Infographic ESS Schorerpolder 3.JPG|name=artist impression|dialog=process-file-dialog}}) ====
Groups of students compared the alternative designs for ecosystem services
1. Sustainable use of abiotic resources ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Abiotic resources.pdf|name=Sinke et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
2. Use as a nursery for fish ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Nursery for Fish.pdf|name=Lee et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
3. Provision of habitat and foraging area for birds ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Bird Foraging Habitat Schorerpolder.pdf|name=Burger et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
4. Enhance the biodiversity of hard structures in the intertidal zone of the area ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Hard substrate biodiversity.pdf|name=Metekohij et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
5. Quantification of primary production and carbon dioxide sequestration {{Cite|resource=Bestand:Poster CO2 student 2018.pptx|name=(Mol et al. 2018)|dialog=process-file-dialog}}
6. Quantification of the water purification capacity of salt marshes ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Water purification capacity.pdf|name=Correa et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
7. Possibilities for aquaculture (Abbenis, 2018)
==== Limits and opportunities ====
The possibilities for Schorerpolder are limited because of its location, what is to be found below and above the surface and where it is currently used for. The layer approach was used to define the spatial impact of the area. The most important outcome of the research was the amount of cables and tubes that where present in the area, all of importance to the harbor (Lambregts, 2018).
[[Bestand:4 alternative designs.jpg|miniatuur|Four alternative designs for Schorerpolder.]]
==== Designs ====
The four different designs of Schorerpolder, were assessed based on the ecosystem services and expenses on creation and maintenance.
Open connection: Opening up the polder completely would allow for natural processes that make intertidal areas so unique to shape and form the area. By letting these tides flow through the area unhindered the potential intertidal area is maximized which is beneficial for wading birds but downside is that all dikes would have to be overhauled.
Controlled tide: This design needs less changes in the primary dike than the previous one and is beneficial as fish nursery (e.g. eel) because of the presence of a gully and denitrification can occur in anaerobic environments. In addition salt marshes can develop more easily and can store CO2.
Separated functions: This design is expensive as a new dam will be build to separate the harbor from the new intertidal area. Still this leads to opportunities for biodiversity on dams and dikes. The high sedimentation rate will lead to phosphorus burial and options to use the sediment as abiotic resource.
Combined perspectives: By combining low costs and maximizing ecosystem services, the fourth design was born. In addition this design makes aquaculture possible.
==== Conclusion ====
The interactive meeting showed that the majority of the stakeholders were in favor of designs controlled tide and combined perspectives. Further research needs to be done on CO2 reduction capacity of salt marshes.
{{Light Context
|Supercontext=PR 00190
|Topcontext=PR 00190
|Toppage=Other
|Sequence number=1
|Context type=Situation
|Heading=Eerste deel oriënteringsfase Schorerpolder
|Summary=Hier volgen de resultaten van de eerste ontwikkelingsfase van het project Schorerpolder.
|Show referred by=Ja
|Referred by text=Hier wordt aan gewerkt of naar verwezen door:
}}

Bestand:Infographic ESS Schorerpolder 3.JPG

2018-08-06T13:11:43Z

Mireille martens:

{{Resource Light config}}
{{Resource Description
|file name=Infographic_ESS_Schorerpolder 3.JPG
|created in page=LC 00885
|title=Artist impression of ecosystem services in Schorerpolder
|creator=Hilde van Lerberghe
|date=2018-06-06
}}

Bestand:Infographic ESS Schorerpolder 3.JPG

2018-08-06T13:11:40Z

Mireille martens:

LC 00885

2018-08-06T13:07:54Z

Mireille martens:

=== Start project ===
On the first of February 2018, the project started to map different alternative designs based on previous studies and outcomes of new studies. Two researchers of the Building with Nature group of HZ coordinated this research and guided the involved students. The expertise of researchers of water safety and spatial planning, civil engineering and vitality and tourism was added. A stakeholder meeting was organised the 14th of June to share the outcomes of the first six months and to organize discussion about the different alternative designs.
==== Ecosystem services ====
Groups of students compared the alternative designs for ecosystem services
1. Sustainable use of abiotic resources ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Abiotic resources.pdf|name=Sinke et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
2. Use as a nursery for fish ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Nursery for Fish.pdf|name=Lee et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
3. Provision of habitat and foraging area for birds ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Bird Foraging Habitat Schorerpolder.pdf|name=Burger et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
4. Enhance the biodiversity of hard structures in the intertidal zone of the area ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Hard substrate biodiversity.pdf|name=Metekohij et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
5. Quantification of primary production and carbon dioxide sequestration {{Cite|resource=Bestand:Poster CO2 student 2018.pptx|name=(Mol et al. 2018)|dialog=process-file-dialog}}
6. Quantification of the water purification capacity of salt marshes ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Water purification capacity.pdf|name=Correa et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
7. Possibilities for aquaculture (Abbenis, 2018)
==== Limits and opportunities ====
The possibilities for Schorerpolder are limited because of its location, what is to be found below and above the surface and where it is currently used for. The layer approach was used to define the spatial impact of the area. The most important outcome of the research was the amount of cables and tubes that where present in the area, all of importance to the harbor (Lambregts, 2018).
[[Bestand:4 alternative designs.jpg|miniatuur|Four alternative designs for Schorerpolder.]]
==== Designs ====
The four different designs of Schorerpolder, were assessed based on the ecosystem services and expenses on creation and maintenance.
Open connection: Opening up the polder completely would allow for natural processes that make intertidal areas so unique to shape and form the area. By letting these tides flow through the area unhindered the potential intertidal area is maximized which is beneficial for wading birds but downside is that all dikes would have to be overhauled.
Controlled tide: This design needs less changes in the primary dike than the previous one and is beneficial as fish nursery (e.g. eel) because of the presence of a gully and denitrification can occur in anaerobic environments. In addition salt marshes can develop more easily and can store CO2.
Separated functions: This design is expensive as a new dam will be build to separate the harbor from the new intertidal area. Still this leads to opportunities for biodiversity on dams and dikes. The high sedimentation rate will lead to phosphorus burial and options to use the sediment as abiotic resource.
Combined perspectives: By combining low costs and maximizing ecosystem services, the fourth design was born. In addition this design makes aquaculture possible.
==== Conclusion ====
The interactive meeting showed that the majority of the stakeholders were in favor of designs controlled tide and combined perspectives. Further research needs to be done on CO2 reduction capacity of salt marshes.
{{Light Context
|Supercontext=PR 00190
|Topcontext=PR 00190
|Toppage=Other
|Sequence number=1
|Context type=Situation
|Heading=Eerste deel oriënteringsfase Schorerpolder
|Summary=Hier volgen de resultaten van de eerste ontwikkelingsfase van het project Schorerpolder.
|Show referred by=Ja
|Referred by text=Hier wordt aan gewerkt of naar verwezen door:
}}

LC 00885

2018-08-06T12:48:44Z

Mireille martens:

=== Start project ===
On the first of February 2018, the project started to map different alternative designs based on previous studies and outcomes of new studies. Two researchers of the Building with Nature group of HZ coordinated this research and guided the involved students. The expertise of researchers of water safety and spatial planning, civil engineering and vitality and tourism was added. A stakeholder meeting was organised the 14th of June to share the outcomes of the first six months and to organize discussion about the different alternative designs.
==== Ecosystem services ====
Groups of students compared the alternative designs for ecosystem services
1. Sustainable use of abiotic resources ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Abiotic resources.pdf|name=Sinke et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
2. Use as a nursery for fish ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Nursery for Fish.pdf|name=Lee et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
3. Provision of habitat and foraging area for birds ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Bird Foraging Habitat Schorerpolder.pdf|name=Burger et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
4. Enhance the biodiversity of hard structures in the intertidal zone of the area ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Hard substrate biodiversity.pdf|name=Metekohij et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
5. Quantification of primary production and carbon dioxide sequestration {{Cite|resource=Bestand:Poster CO2 student 2018.pptx|name=(Mol et al. 2018)|dialog=process-file-dialog}}
6. Quantification of the water purification capacity of salt marshes ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Water purification capacity.pdf|name=Correa et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
7. Possibilities for aquaculture (Abbenis, 2018)
==== Limits and opportunities ====
The possibilities for Schorerpolder are limited because of its location, what is to be found below and above the surface and where it is currently used for. The layer approach was used to define the spatial impact of the area. The most important outcome of the research was the amount of cables and tubes that where present in the area, all of importance to the harbor (Lambregts, 2018).
[[Bestand:4 alternative designs.jpg|miniatuur|Four alternative designs for Schorerpolder.]]
==== Designs ====
The four different designs of Schorerpolder, were assessed based on the ecosystem services and expenses on creation and maintenance.
Open connection: Opening up the polder completely would allow for natural processes that make intertidal areas so unique to shape and form the area. By letting these tides flow through the area unhindered the potential intertidal area is maximized which is beneficial for wading birds but downside is that all dikes would have to be overhauled.
Controlled tide: This design needs less changes in the primary dike than the previous one and is beneficial as fish nursery (e.g. eel) because of the presence of a gully and denitrification can occur in anaerobic environments. In addition salt marshes can develop more easily and can store CO2.
Separated functions: This design is expensive as a new dam will be build to separate the harbor from the new intertidal area. Still this leads to opportunities for biodiversity on dams and dikes. The high sedimentation rate will lead to phosphorus burial and options to use the sediment as abiotic resource.
Combined perspectives: By combining low costs and maximizing ecosystem services, the fourth design was born. In addition this design makes aquaculture possible.
{{Light Context
|Supercontext=PR 00190
|Topcontext=PR 00190
|Toppage=Other
|Sequence number=1
|Context type=Situation
|Heading=Eerste deel oriënteringsfase Schorerpolder
|Summary=Hier volgen de resultaten van de eerste ontwikkelingsfase van het project Schorerpolder.
|Show referred by=Ja
|Referred by text=Hier wordt aan gewerkt of naar verwezen door:
}}

LC 00885

2018-08-06T08:46:05Z

Mireille martens:

=== Start project ===
On the first of February 2018, the project started to map different alternative designs based on previous studies and outcomes of new studies. Two researchers of the Building with Nature group of HZ coordinated this research and guided the involved students. The expertise of researchers of water safety and spatial planning, civil engineering and vitality and tourism was added. A stakeholder meeting was organised the 14th of June to share the outcomes of the first six months and to organize discussion about the different alternative designs.
==== Ecosystem services ====
Groups of students compared the alternative designs for ecosystem services
1. Sustainable use of abiotic resources ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Abiotic resources.pdf|name=Sinke et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
2. Use as a nursery for fish ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Nursery for Fish.pdf|name=Lee et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
3. Provision of habitat and foraging area for birds ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Bird Foraging Habitat Schorerpolder.pdf|name=Burger et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
4. Enhance the biodiversity of hard structures in the intertidal zone of the area ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Hard substrate biodiversity.pdf|name=Metekohij et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
5. Quantification of primary production and carbon dioxide sequestration {{Cite|resource=Bestand:Poster CO2 student 2018.pptx|name=(Mol et al. 2018)|dialog=process-file-dialog}}
6. Quantification of the water purification capacity of salt marshes ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Water purification capacity.pdf|name=Correa et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
7. Possibilities for aquaculture (Abbenis, 2018)
==== Limits and opportunities ====
The possibilities for Schorerpolder are limited because of its location, what is to be found below and above the surface and where it is currently used for. The layer approach was used to define the spatial impact of the area. The most important outcome of the research was the amount of cables and tubes that where present in the area, all of importance to the harbor (Lambregts, 2018).
[[Bestand:4 alternative designs.jpg|miniatuur|Four alternative designs for Schorerpolder.]]
==== Designs ====
The four different designs of Schorerpolder, were assessed based on the ecosystem services and expenses on creation and maintenance.
Open connection: Opening up the polder completely would allow for natural processes that make intertidal areas so unique to shape and form the area. By letting these tides flow through the area unhindered the potential intertidal area is maximized which is beneficial for wading birds but downside is that all dikes would have to be overhauled.
Controlled tide: This design needs less changes in the primary dike than the previous one and is beneficial as fish nursery (e.g. eel) because of the presence of a gully and denitrification can occur in anaerobic environments. In addition salt marshes can develop more easily and can store CO2.
Separated functions:
{{Light Context
|Supercontext=PR 00190
|Topcontext=PR 00190
|Toppage=Other
|Sequence number=1
|Context type=Situation
|Heading=Eerste deel oriënteringsfase Schorerpolder
|Summary=Hier volgen de resultaten van de eerste ontwikkelingsfase van het project Schorerpolder.
|Show referred by=Ja
|Referred by text=Hier wordt aan gewerkt of naar verwezen door:
}}

LC 00885

2018-08-06T08:44:43Z

Mireille martens:

=== Start project ===
On the first of February 2018, the project started to map different alternative designs based on previous studies and outcomes of new studies. Two researchers of the Building with Nature group of HZ coordinated this research and guided the involved students. The expertise of researchers of water safety and spatial planning, civil engineering and vitality and tourism was added. A stakeholder meeting was organised the 14th of June to share the outcomes of the first six months and to organize discussion about the different alternative designs.
==== Ecosystem services ====
Groups of students compared the alternative designs for ecosystem services
1.      Sustainable use of abiotic resources ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Abiotic resources.pdf|name=Sinke et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
2.      Use as a nursery for fish ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Nursery for Fish.pdf|name=Lee et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
3.      Provision of habitat and foraging area for birds ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Bird Foraging Habitat Schorerpolder.pdf|name=Burger et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
4.      Enhance the biodiversity of hard structures in the intertidal zone of the area ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Hard substrate biodiversity.pdf|name=Metekohij et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
5.      Quantification of primary production and carbon dioxide sequestration {{Cite|resource=Bestand:Poster CO2 student 2018.pptx|name=(Mol et al. 2018)|dialog=process-file-dialog}}
6. Quantification of the water purification capacity of salt marshes ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Water purification capacity.pdf|name=Correa et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
7. Possibilities for aquaculture (Abbenis, 2018)
==== Limits and opportunities ====
The possibilities for Schorerpolder are limited because of its location, what is to be found below and above the surface and where it is currently used for. The layer approach was used to define the spatial impact of the area. The most important outcome of the research was the amount of cables and tubes that where present in the area, all of importance to the harbor (Lambregts, 2018).
[[Bestand:4 alternative designs.jpg|miniatuur|Four alternative designs for Schorerpolder.]]
==== Designs ====
The four different designs of Schorerpolder, were assessed based on the ecosystem services and expenses on creation and maintenance.

===== Open connection: Opening up the polder completely would allow for natural processes that make intertidal areas so unique to shape and form the area. By letting these tides flow through the area unhindered the potential intertidal area is maximized which is beneficial for wading birds but downside is that all dikes would have to be overhauled. =====
===== Controlled tide: This design needs less changes in the primary dike than the previous one and is beneficial as fish nursery (e.g. eel) because of the presence of a gully and denitrification can occur in anaerobic environments. In addition salt marshes can develop more easily and can store CO2. Separated functions: =====
{{Light Context
|Supercontext=PR 00190
|Topcontext=PR 00190
|Toppage=Other
|Sequence number=1
|Context type=Situation
|Heading=Eerste deel oriënteringsfase Schorerpolder
|Summary=Hier volgen de resultaten van de eerste ontwikkelingsfase van het project Schorerpolder.
|Show referred by=Ja
|Referred by text=Hier wordt aan gewerkt of naar verwezen door:
}}

LC 00885

2018-08-06T08:43:52Z

Mireille martens:

=== Start project ===
On the first of February 2018, the project started to map different alternative designs based on previous studies and outcomes of new studies. Two researchers of the Building with Nature group of HZ coordinated this research and guided the involved students. The expertise of researchers of water safety and spatial planning, civil engineering and vitality and tourism was added. A stakeholder meeting was organised the 14th of June to share the outcomes of the first six months and to organize discussion about the different alternative designs.
==== Ecosystem services ====
Groups of students compared the alternative designs for ecosystem services
1.      Sustainable use of abiotic resources ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Abiotic resources.pdf|name=Sinke et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
2.      Use as a nursery for fish ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Nursery for Fish.pdf|name=Lee et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
3.      Provision of habitat and foraging area for birds ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Bird Foraging Habitat Schorerpolder.pdf|name=Burger et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
4.      Enhance the biodiversity of hard structures in the intertidal zone of the area ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Hard substrate biodiversity.pdf|name=Metekohij et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
5.      Quantification of primary production and carbon dioxide sequestration {{Cite|resource=Bestand:Poster CO2 student 2018.pptx|name=(Mol et al. 2018)|dialog=process-file-dialog}}
6. Quantification of the water purification capacity of salt marshes ({{Cite|resource=Bestand:Water purification capacity.pdf|name=Correa et al. 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}})
7. Possibilities for aquaculture (Abbenis, 2018)
==== Limits and opportunities ====
The possibilities for Schorerpolder are limited because of its location, what is to be found below and above the surface and where it is currently used for. The layer approach was used to define the spatial impact of the area. The most important outcome of the research was the amount of cables and tubes that where present in the area, all of importance to the harbor (Lambregts, 2018).
[[Bestand:4 alternative designs.jpg|miniatuur|Four alternative designs for Schorerpolder.]]
==== Designs ====
The four different designs of Schorerpolder, were assessed based on the ecosystem services and expenses on creation and maintenance.
Open connection: Opening up the polder completely would allow for natural processes that make intertidal areas so unique to shape and form the area. By letting these tides flow through the area unhindered the potential intertidal area is maximized which is beneficial for wading birds but downside is that all dikes would have to be overhauled.
Controlled tide: This design needs less changes in the primary dike than the previous one and is beneficial as fish nursery (e.g. eel) because of the presence of a gully and denitrification can occur in anaerobic environments. In addition salt marshes can develop more easily and can store CO2.
Separated functions:

{{Light Context
|Supercontext=PR 00190
|Topcontext=PR 00190
|Toppage=Other
|Sequence number=1
|Context type=Situation
|Heading=Eerste deel oriënteringsfase Schorerpolder
|Summary=Hier volgen de resultaten van de eerste ontwikkelingsfase van het project Schorerpolder.
|Show referred by=Ja
|Referred by text=Hier wordt aan gewerkt of naar verwezen door:
}}

Bestand:4 alternative designs.jpg

2018-08-06T08:29:38Z

Mireille martens:

Four alternative designs for Schorerpolder

Bestand:4 alternatives.jpg

2018-08-06T08:21:14Z

Mireille martens:

Four alternative designs for Schorerpolder

LC 00885

2018-08-06T06:58:21Z

Mireille martens:

Bestand:Hard substrate biodiversity.pdf

2018-08-06T06:41:09Z

Mireille martens:

{{Resource Light config}}
{{Resource Description
|file name=Hard substrate biodiversity.pdf
|created in page=LC 00885
|title=Biodiversity on hard substrate
|creator=Tamarindo Metekohij, Elleke de Koeijer, Han Cao, Jochem Rozinga
|date=2018-06-14
|organization=HZ
}}

Bestand:Hard substrate biodiversity.pdf

2018-08-06T06:41:05Z

Mireille martens:

Bestand:Bird Foraging Habitat Schorerpolder.pdf

2018-08-06T06:36:48Z

Mireille martens:

{{Resource Light config}}
{{Resource Description
|file name=Bird Foraging Habitat Schorerpolder.pdf
|created in page=LC 00885
|title=Bird foraging habitat
|creator=Jan Burger, Hassan Al-bahri, Lorenzo Franzoni, David Gooren, Jort Rootlieb
|date=2018-06-14
|organization=HZ
|subject=dry fall period, birds
}}

Bestand:Bird Foraging Habitat Schorerpolder.pdf

2018-08-06T06:36:45Z

Mireille martens:

Bestand:Nursery for Fish.pdf

2018-08-06T06:31:39Z

Mireille martens:

{{Resource Light config}}
{{Resource Description
|file name=Nursery for Fish.pdf
|created in page=LC 00885
|title=Nursery for Fish_Eel
|creator=June Lee, Lies Hamelink
|date=2018-06-14
|organization=HZ
|subject=Eel,
}}

Bestand:Nursery for Fish.pdf

2018-08-06T06:31:36Z

Mireille martens:

Bestand:Abiotic resources.pdf

2018-08-06T06:28:57Z

Mireille martens:

{{Resource Light config}}
{{Resource Description
|file name=Abiotic resources.pdf
|created in page=LC 00885
|title=Abiotic resource_sediment
|creator=Melanie Sinke, Alexander Noordegraaf, Htun Thiri Naing, Yifei Song
|date=2018-06-14
|organization=HZ
|subject=clay, sediment,
}}

Bestand:Abiotic resources.pdf

2018-08-06T06:28:54Z

Mireille martens:

Bestand:Water purification capacity.pdf

2018-08-06T06:24:57Z

Mireille martens:

{{Resource Light config}}
{{Resource Description
|file name=Water purification capacity.pdf
|created in page=LC 00885
|title=Water purification capacity_Schorerpolder
|creator=Ximena Correa, Morales Pamela, Lorenzo Somai, Melle den Toonder, Leonardo Gemelli
|date=2018-06-14
|organization=HZ
|subject=water purification, phosphor, nitrogen, nutrients
}}

Bestand:Water purification capacity.pdf

2018-08-06T06:24:53Z

Mireille martens:

LC 00885

2018-06-21T12:32:25Z

Mireille martens:

=== Start project ===
Ik eb {{Cite|resource=Bestand:Poster CO2 student 2018.pptx|name=(Mol et al. 2018)|dialog=process-file-dialog}}
{{Light Context
|Supercontext=PR 00190
|Topcontext=PR 00190
|Toppage=Other
|Sequence number=1
|Context type=Situation
|Heading=Eerste deel oriënteringsfase Schorerpolder
|Summary=Hier volgen de resultaten van de eerste ontwikkelingsfase van het project Schorerpolder.
|Show referred by=Ja
|Referred by text=Hier wordt aan gewerkt of naar verwezen door:
}}

Bestand:Poster CO2 student 2018.pptx

2018-06-21T12:30:53Z

Mireille martens:

{{Resource Light config}}
{{Resource Description
|file name=Poster CO2_student 2018.pptx
|created in page=LC 00885
|title=Poster CO2 emissie_studenten 2018
|creator=Mol Yoni, Carelse Pjotr, Tigli Maddalena
|date=2018-06-14
|organization=HZ
|subject=CO2, Intergetijdegebied, Emissiecompensatie
}}

Bestand:Poster CO2 student 2018.pptx

2018-06-21T12:30:50Z

Mireille martens:

LC 00885

2018-06-21T12:20:16Z

Mireille martens: Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met ' {{Light Context |Supercontext=PR 00190 |Topcontext=PR 00190 |Toppage=Other |Sequence number=1 |Context type=Situation |Heading=Eerste deel oriënteringsfase Schore...'

{{Light Context
|Supercontext=PR 00190
|Topcontext=PR 00190
|Toppage=Other
|Sequence number=1
|Context type=Situation
|Heading=Eerste deel oriënteringsfase Schorerpolder
|Summary=Hier volgen de resultaten van de eerste ontwikkelingsfase van het project Schorerpolder.
|Show referred by=Ja
|Referred by text=Hier wordt aan gewerkt of naar verwezen door:
}}

Gebruiker:Mireille martens

2018-06-21T12:05:57Z

Mireille martens:

{{Contributor config}}
{{Contributor
|Name=mireille martens
|Organization=Building with Nature
|Email=mireille.martens@hz.nl
}}
{{CNTR Project
|Project=PR 00190
|CNTR Role=Project leader, Projectleider
}}